Friday Night’s Alright For Football (But Monday Isn’t…)
The Spanish football season kicked off on the evening of Friday 16th August with a surprise 1-0 victory for Athletic Bilbao over Barcelona. However, the fixture nearly didn’t go ahead as planned on the Friday evening and was only confirmed a week before the curtain-raising weekend by an ‘interim’ ruling of a judge in a Madrid commercial court.
The uncertainty has been caused by a dispute, the latest in a long-running administrative war, between LaLiga (the Spanish league body) and RFEF (the Spanish FA) regarding who has the competence to select the days on which fixtures take place in the top two Spanish divisions. This article examines the root of the dispute, the decision handed down by the judge and the implications for clubs and broadcasters domestically and internationally.
The schedule for the opening weekends in the top two Spanish divisions was first ‘announced’ by LaLiga and included (for the top division) the Bilbao-Barcelona fixture on Friday evening and two fixtures scheduled for the Monday evening. On 26th July, the RFEF ‘overruled’ this and stated that all fixtures on the opening three weekends of the season would take place on Saturdays or Sundays, unilaterally adjusting the schedule accordingly. After an unsuccessful mediation attempt, LaLiga referred the matter to the Spanish courts, seeking an order that RFEF should “cease to carry out any actions that prevent LaLiga from complying with its obligations with the [TV] operators” and therefore to respect LaLiga’s scheduling of matches on Fridays and Mondays.
LaLiga argued that it holds an exclusive right to organise the first and second divisions of Spanish football competition, including “how to develop the competition as well as to exploit the audiovisual rights”. LaLiga submitted that Royal Decree 5/2015 (a key piece of legislation allowing the centralised sale of media rights by LaLiga) gives LaLiga exclusive competence to set dates and times of fixtures, to sit alongside its competence to market the media rights.
Furthermore, LaLiga stated that “holding matches on Mondays and Fridays is transcendental to the exploitation of the media content”. One of LaLiga’s witnesses, the president of Mediapro (who act as LaLiga’s agent in the international marketing of the TV rights), pointed to the example of the Arab market for Friday nights, stating “Playing on a Friday puts us in the Arab market, as Friday is the weekend there. It’s not a coincidence that the Premier League has started to do that now.” This emphasises the competition between major football leagues to further their brand in international markets, and the importance of scheduling to the value of a league’s product.
The RFEF argued that, according to its Statutes (at inter alia Articles 29 and 32) the process for setting the calendar requires final approval from the RFEF following a request from La Liga. A key part of this dispute centred on the principle of co-ordination between LaLiga and RFEF. The previous “Co-ordination Agreement” between LaLiga and RFEF (which ran for a 5-year period from 11 August 2014) contained, at Annex 2, an authorisation to “hold matches in [the top two divisions] on the Friday before and/or the Monday after each official game-week”. The RFEF pointed to the fact that in the new Agreement, concluded in July 2019, did not contain this general authorisation so LaLiga could not simply go ahead and schedule matches on those days.
The RFEF has consistently pointed to dwindling Monday attendances and serious fan discontent as reasons to resist scheduling fixtures on that day. It is not uncommon for fixtures in Spain to kick off at 9.30pm local time on Mondays to accommodate factors such as prime-time television slots and the heat, so it is easy to see why fans may not make lengthy journeys to these games. These arguments highlight the ever-increasing tug of war between the interests of the rights distributors and the interests of football fans wishing to watch their team play live.
The judge issued a 32-page ‘decision’ (in Spanish only) on 9 August. He ruled (at paragraph 20) that in principle, the model for arranging matchdays outside of the official days of Saturday and Sunday should be that of co-ordination, and that the Royal Decree 5/2015 had not changed this. However, the judge stated that the RFEF, in negotiations for the most recent co-ordination agreement, might have carried out a “disloyal practice” in not granting the same authorisation for Monday and Friday fixtures as it had previously given in Annex 2 of the 2014 agreement. The judge considered that the RFEF’s primary opposition has been to Monday fixtures and that it would be prepared to negotiate regarding Friday fixtures. He therefore arrived at what has been described as a “Solomonic” interim order that, for the first 3 weeks of the season, matches may be scheduled for Fridays, but not for Mondays. Scheduling on Fridays is subject to LaLiga paying the RFEF €15million as an “estimation of the damages that the RFEF may suffer for the temporary interference.”
These interim measures will need to be revisited for the remainder of the season once each party’s position has been argued more fully. However, the possible implications for clubs and broadcasters are wide. Between 60%-90% of income for Spanish clubs is derived from television rights money, and it is estimated that as a result of matches not being able to take place on Mondays, the sum payable under LaLiga’s TV deals may be up to €300million less in total annually than what had been initially negotiated with broadcasters. This matter will rumble on and will no doubt continue to be framed as the RFEF attempting to protect the fans’ interests, locked in battle with LaLiga who wish to make their product as appealing as possible to broadcasters worldwide.
For more information please contact Jonathan Hyman on +44 (0)20 7438 2201 or at Jonathan.Hyman@crsblaw.com.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Stop, collaborate and listen: Top 10 Tips with Collaboration Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips on collaboration agreements - what should you know?
"The WinnerS Take It All"
In a sports setting, it is most unusual to see so many winners arising out of a decision by a rights holder to share rights.
Fiona Edmond and Mark Smith write for Property Week on data centres as an infrastructure asset class
The complexity of operational issues is something those new to the sector may not anticipate and interest is likely to increase.
Preparing your company for sale
We set out here some initial steps to consider in anticipation of a sale.
ESG investment and the challenges for trustees
What challenges does the ESG revolution present for trustees of private family trusts?
The impact of COVID-19 on commercial and residential tenancies
What impact has COVID-19 had on commercial and residential tenancies? Read more here.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises discoverIE on its acquisition of Antenova
discoverIE is a leading international designer, manufacturer and supplier of customised electronics to industry.
Q&A: Separate blocks, common parts and enfranchisement
Miriam Seitler and Lauren Fraser answer queries relating to leaseholders seeking to acquire the freehold.
2020: Influencer, 2021: Creative Director – what could go wrong?
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
The family court’s role in micro managing 'trivial' disputes
The recent decision has dealt with the family court’s role in micro managing “trivial” disputes in relation to children
Gareth Mills writes for Lexology Getting The Deal Through on technology disputes in Bahrain
The most common disputes occur following perceived or actual failures to deliver required technology services an lack of clarity.
Taxing horizons and fiscal black holes
A super-massive black hole at the centre of the nation’s finances means that tax reform and rates rises look increasingly likely.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Acora on acquisition of Westgate IT
Westgate IT specialises in providing IT support to businesses in the South West.
Jason Saiban writes for Food Manufacture on the food industry's climate change challenge
The key challenge will be how the environmental targets are actually met.
Q&A: Wrestling with restrictive covenants
Camilla Lamont (barrister at Landmark Chambers) and Real Estate Disputes Partner Emma Humphreys answer a pair of covenant queries
Keep Your Enemies Close – Multi-Club Ownership in UEFA Competition
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.