ASA have no time for misleading ads about Amazon Prime
On the 30 October 2019, the Advertising Standards Agency (“ASA”), published its ruling on an Amazon Prime advertising campaign run by Amazon Europe Core Sarl (“Amazon”). The ASA being the body responsible for ensuring non-broadcast advertising complies with the UK Code of non-broadcast Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing (the “CAP Code”).
The ASA considered complaints about an Amazon ad which stated as part of the checkout process “… we’re giving you a 30-day free trial of Amazon Prime! Starting with this order …” The ad appeared during the checkout process throughout May and June 2019 and, in short, presented a number of options for accepting or rejecting the free trial on offer.
The ASA described the ad, as follows: a gold box included text which stated, “Order Now with Prime”. That box was contained within a larger grey box. Text underneath the gold box, but within the grey one, stated, “Continue with FREE One-Day Delivery Pay later”. An option to the left in blue text stated, “Continue and don’t gain Amazon Prime benefits”. Small print at the bottom of the page stated, “By signing up you acknowledge that you have read and agree to the Amazon Prime Terms and Conditions and authorise us to charge your credit card … after your 30-day free trial …”
So far, so unclear? A number of consumers asserted that the presentation of the options as set out above was indeed unclear and challenged whether the ad was misleading.
Defending itself to the ASA, Amazon explained the ad was part of its efforts to improve the signup experience for customers and ensure those customers who joined Amazon Prime did so intentionally and became active members who would make the most of their Amazon Prime benefits. Amazon also provided confidential data which it asserted demonstrated customers were clear on the options provided and, in particular, were clear that the “Continue and don’t gain Amazon Prime benefits” allowed them to continue without signing up to Amazon Prime.
The ASA found the ad breached rules 3.1 and 3.9 of the CAP Code, as follows:
- The presentation of the options was likely to mislead the average consumer about the exact options available. This is contrary to rule 3.1 of the CAP Code which requires “marketing communications must not materially mislead or be likely to do so.”
- The presentation of the options was also likely to mislead the average consumer into signing up for Amazon Prime without being fully aware that after the expiry of the initial 30-day free trial, they would be charged for the membership. This is contrary to rule 3.9 of the CAP Code which requires “marketing communications must state significant limitations and qualifications…”
As part of the ruling Amazon were advised to stop using the ad and to ensure that going forward options relating to signing up to, or electing not to sign up to, Amazon Prime were presented clearly and prominently.
This case highlights that the presentation of an ad is equally as important as the text of the ad itself. It is worth noting that the Amazon ad contained the wording required under the CAP Code (i.e. the qualification re the membership payments becoming due on the expiry of the 30-day free trial) but the confusing presentation of such wording resulted in the ad falling foul of the CAP Code nevertheless.
This article was written by Rachel Bell. For more information, please contact Rachel on +44(0)20 7427 6573 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Stop, collaborate and listen: Top 10 Tips with Collaboration Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips on collaboration agreements - what should you know?
Fiona Edmond and Mark Smith write for Property Week on data centres as an infrastructure asset class
The complexity of operational issues is something those new to the sector may not anticipate and interest is likely to increase.
Preparing your company for sale
We set out here some initial steps to consider in anticipation of a sale.
ESG investment and the challenges for trustees
What challenges does the ESG revolution present for trustees of private family trusts?
The impact of COVID-19 on commercial and residential tenancies
What impact has COVID-19 had on commercial and residential tenancies? Read more here.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises discoverIE on its acquisition of Antenova
discoverIE is a leading international designer, manufacturer and supplier of customised electronics to industry.
Q&A: Separate blocks, common parts and enfranchisement
Miriam Seitler and Lauren Fraser answer queries relating to leaseholders seeking to acquire the freehold.
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
The family court’s role in micro managing 'trivial' disputes
The recent decision has dealt with the family court’s role in micro managing “trivial” disputes in relation to children
Gareth Mills writes for Lexology Getting The Deal Through on technology disputes in Bahrain
The most common disputes occur following perceived or actual failures to deliver required technology services an lack of clarity.
Taxing horizons and fiscal black holes
A super-massive black hole at the centre of the nation’s finances means that tax reform and rates rises look increasingly likely.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Acora on acquisition of Westgate IT
Westgate IT specialises in providing IT support to businesses in the South West.
Jason Saiban writes for Food Manufacture on the food industry's climate change challenge
The key challenge will be how the environmental targets are actually met.
Q&A: Wrestling with restrictive covenants
Camilla Lamont (barrister at Landmark Chambers) and Real Estate Disputes Partner Emma Humphreys answer a pair of covenant queries
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Grape Paradise on the acquisition of a fine wine business
Charles Russell Speechlys has advised Grape Paradise on the acquisition of the Sarment Group in the China Mainland territories.
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.
Collateral Warranties – Are they also a ‘Construction Contract’?
What are collateral warranties and what do they mean for your construction contracts? Read more here.
eCommerce and the Post-Brexit State of Play
Key UK and EU legislation governing how online platforms deal with consumers and their business users.