Limitation of the force majeure clause
On 3 July 2018, the High Court issued its judgment in the case of Seadrill Ghana Operations Limited v Tullow Ghana Limited. The judge found that the defaulting party could not rely upon “force majeure” to terminate the contract because only one of the two events preventing performance was a force majeure event.
Facts
Tullow Ghana Limited (Tullow) hired a semi-submersible drilling rig from Seadrill Ghana Operations Limited (Seadrill) for operations off the Ghanaian coast. The contract was signed in 2012 with the term due to continue through to June 2018.
Two events led to Tullow being unable to comply with the contract:
- in April 2015, due to a territorial dispute between Ghana and its neighbour, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana imposed a drilling moratorium over parts of the oil fields; and
- in February 2016, a technical problem arose on the drilling rig and, concerned by the fault, the Government of Ghana refused to approve Tullow’s plan to develop and drill one of the oil fields.
The drilling moratorium was defined as a force majeure event in the contract and in March 2016, Tullow notified Seadrill that it would be terminating the contract on this basis.
Seadrill disputed Tullow’s right to terminate using the force majeure provisions and instead claimed that Tullow’s failure to perform the contract was caused by a force majeure event (the moratorium) and a non-force majeure event (the failure to obtain approval). In these circumstances, Seadrill argued Tullow could not rely on force majeure and was instead exercising its right to terminate the contract for convenience, entitling Seadrill to an early termination fee of 60% of the day rate of the rig for the remaining period of the contract, which exceeded US$270 million.
Reliance of the force majeure clause
The judge referred to the case of Intertradex v Lesieur and the wording of the contract itself and stated that when relying on a force majeure clause, a force majeure event must be the sole cause of the failure to perform an obligation. In this case, the judge considered there to be two effective causes that prevented performance: (i) the drilling moratorium and (ii) the fact that Tullow had failed to secure permission from the Government of Ghana. As such, he concluded that the force majeure clause could not be relied upon.
Reasonable endeavours
Although not central to the decision, the court also considered whether the defendant had used its reasonable endeavours to avoid or circumvent the effect of the force majeure, as per the requirements of the contract’s force majeure clause. The judge highlighted the availability of other wells that were not subject to the moratorium; judging that remedial steps existed but had not been taken solely because they were less technically straightforward and/or commercially attractive.
The judge conceded that when exercising its reasonable endeavours to avoid or circumvent the force majeure event, Tullow was entitled to consider its own interests, and in particular, whether there was a business case for drilling at another well. However, Tullow was also bound to consider the interests of Seadrill, which it did not do.
Comment
Although there is case law to assist in the interpretation of force majeure clauses, the fact remains it is a purely contractual concept and thorough drafting can safeguard against unnecessary complications.
This decision also emphasises the need to exercise caution before evoking a force majeure clause. It is not enough to just show that a force majeure event has occurred; the party relying on it must show that the event was the sole cause of the failure to perform its contractual obligations.
Lastly, it is not clear from the judgment where the line is drawn between what are considered to be reasonable endeavours and what are not in relation to force majeure events. Depending on the circumstances, it may be worth defining what is captured by reasonable endeavours at the drafting stage and, for force majeure clauses specifically, expressly including the consideration of the commercial interests of the other party.
This article was written by Lydia Fernandes. For more information please contact Lydia on +44 (0)20 7438 2104 or at lydia.fernandes@crsblaw.com.
Our thinking
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 14 April 2021
This week's competition update.
James Scott
ESG – Searching for substance behind the acronym
ESG is an acronym much used but perhaps less understood.
Caroline Swain
THE. PUB. IS. OPEN. but for how long?
Emma Humphreys
How will the commercial property market exit COVID-19 restrictions?
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 7 April 2021
This week's competition update.
Rahim Hirji
No ticket, no merger: Viagogo and StubHub are one step closer to merging but must satisfy the CMA’s conditions
The £3.2bn acquisition of online ticketing company Stubhub by one of its competitors, Viagogo is one step closer to being finalised.
Paul Henty
Client alert: Construction under competition law spotlight
We outline the three investigations which have either recently concluded or are ongoing together with what this means for businesses.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 31 March 2021
This week's competition update.
Mark Bailey
CIS General Insurance Limited v IBM United Kingdom Limited - An analysis
Slow and chaotic – lessons from a digital transformation disaster in CIS General Insurance Limited v IBM United Kingdom Limited.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 24 March 2021
This week's competition update.
Adrian Mayer
Charles Russell Speechlys, Strategic Partners of the Asoko Insight West Africa's Family-Owned Business Report
The report is the most comprehensive study of Family-Owned Businesses throughout West Africa.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 17 March 2021
This week's competition update.
Anna Sowerby
Can linking to copyright material be restricted? Yes - clarity at last.
The Court of Justice of the European Union held that a copyright owner could indeed restrict linking to material.
Tanya Wilkie
Age Appropriate Design Code - Are You Ready?
The Age Appropriate Design Code aims to help ensure that children’s privacy is protected online.
Kerry Stares
Doing Business Responsibly: Food & Beverage
A return to growth will be a priority post-pandemic for F&B businesses, and doing business responsibly could help you to achieve it
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 10 March 2021
This week's latest competition update.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 3 March 2021
This week's competition update.
Nia John
Ransomware: Proceed with Caution
It has been a busy few weeks for hackers and cybercrime specialists around the world.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 24 February 2021
Our weekly competition update.
Freddie Law
Advertising Standards: An Update
An update on advertising standards.