Changes to UK Trade Mark Law – what you need to know…
Changes to the UK Trade Mark Act are coming on the 14 January 2019, to implement the 2015 Trade Marks Directive. The main aim of the changes is to modernise existing legislation, to streamline and harmonise registration procedure and to help in the fight against counterfeit goods.
Registrations / Portfolio Management
The definition of what a trade mark is has changed. Where previously trade marks had to be capable of graphic (visual) representation, now they can be represented in any manner which enables determination ‘of the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded’. This will facilitate a more flexible system that allows marks to be represented on the register in any appropriate form, using generally available technology.
This will have particular impact on the filing of ‘non-traditional’ trade marks, for example MP3 and MP4 files will now be accepted, meaning that sound or motion marks should be easier to file. Though it is important to bear in mind that such applications will still have to fulfil the qualifying criteria for a trade mark to be registered (for example, that they are an indication of origin).
It should also be noted that the list of signs that cannot be registered is expanding. Currently, there is an ‘absolute prohibition’ on the registration of signs which consist exclusively of shapes if the shape results from the nature of the goods, or is necessary to achieve a technical result, or gives substantial value to the goods. This prohibition now applies not only to the shape, but to any characteristic of marks – with potentially wide ranging consequences for other non-traditional marks, such as colours.
If a registered trade mark appears in a dictionary or an encyclopaedia (as a generic term), there is provision to force the publisher to clarify that it is a registered trade mark, if they do not do so, an application can be made to a court to force compliance.
Under the new legislation, use of a trade mark as a company name is now specifically listed as an infringing act, and companies can no longer rely on the fact that they are using their own name as a defence to trade mark infringement proceedings (whether in accordance with honest practices or not).
This applies regardless of when use of the company name started, so technically you could be using a name that is allowed currently, but on the 14 January 2019 you will become an infringer. It is important to review your company name to check there is no conflict, and it is more important than ever that business expanding into the UK conduct the necessary searches to ensure their company name will not infringe third party rights.
Continuing the battle against counterfeit goods, trade mark owners can now bring infringement proceedings in relation to preparatory acts, where there is a merely a risk that packaging labels, tags, security or authenticity features bearing a trade mark will be used in relation to infringing goods or services. This gives brand owners greater scope to enforce their rights.
Trade mark owners also have a right to prevent counterfeit goods entering the UK, even if they are not released for free circulation in the UK. Under the new law, it is not necessary to prove that the goods will be put on the market in the UK, it is for the person shipping the goods to show that the trade mark proprietor has no right to stop them being sold in the country of destination.
Comparative advertising is now specifically included as an infringing act, if it is contrary to the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008.
Under the new legislation, non-exclusive licensees can only bring action for infringement with the permission of the brand owner. Exclusive licensees may still bring action if the owner refuses to do so, or fails to for a period of two months. This cannot be excluded in the licence agreement.
Where a brand owner does bring infringement proceedings, all licensees who have suffered loss (whether exclusive or not) can now apply to intervene in court proceedings in order to be awarded a share in any damages. This cannot be excluded in the licence agreement.
Brand owners will generally welcome these changes. In particular, the removal of the requirement for a mark to be capable of graphic representation should enable broader brand protection. It will be interesting to see how the changes affect the use and registration of non-traditional marks, such as sound and motion marks.
The changes to the ‘company name’ defence are important and highlight the need for thorough clearance checks before setting up or expanding a business into the UK. This is, however, good news for trade mark owners who previously would have to accept that a competitor can use a similar name, if they are doing so in accordance with honest practices
The sale of counterfeit goods continues to be a major problem for brand owners, and the change to the rules on infringement will increase the arsenal of tools at their disposal to prevent sales.
For more information please contact Peter Byrd on +44 (0)20 7427 6754 , or at email@example.com.
Residential property developer tax: Draft legislation published and technical consultation launched
While a number of important issues have been addressed in the legislation, there is still a lot outstanding.
Strategic Planning for Modern Landed Estates
The second in our series of articles on succession planning for landed estates covering a wide variety of matters.
When can you set off claims against different elements of a project
The Court’s decision raises important drafting considerations for construction contracts involving multiple elements of a project.
Drafting terms and conditions or negotiating a contract? Be wary of "unusual" and "exorbitant" exclusion clauses
When drafting a set of terms and conditions, companies must adhere to the requirements contained in the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977
Stop, collaborate and listen: Top 10 Tips with Collaboration Agreements
Providing you with the top ten tips on collaboration agreements - what should you know?
Preparing your company for sale
We set out here some initial steps to consider in anticipation of a sale.
ESG investment and the challenges for trustees
What challenges does the ESG revolution present for trustees of private family trusts?
The impact of COVID-19 on commercial and residential tenancies
What impact has COVID-19 had on commercial and residential tenancies? Read more here.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises discoverIE on its acquisition of Antenova
discoverIE is a leading international designer, manufacturer and supplier of customised electronics to industry.
Q&A: Separate blocks, common parts and enfranchisement
Miriam Seitler and Lauren Fraser answer queries relating to leaseholders seeking to acquire the freehold.
2020: Influencer, 2021: Creative Director – what could go wrong?
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
The family court’s role in micro managing 'trivial' disputes
The recent decision has dealt with the family court’s role in micro managing “trivial” disputes in relation to children
Taxing horizons and fiscal black holes
A super-massive black hole at the centre of the nation’s finances means that tax reform and rates rises look increasingly likely.
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Acora on acquisition of Westgate IT
Westgate IT specialises in providing IT support to businesses in the South West.
Jason Saiban writes for Food Manufacture on the food industry's climate change challenge
The key challenge will be how the environmental targets are actually met.
Q&A: Wrestling with restrictive covenants
Camilla Lamont (barrister at Landmark Chambers) and Real Estate Disputes Partner Emma Humphreys answer a pair of covenant queries
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Grape Paradise on the acquisition of a fine wine business
Charles Russell Speechlys has advised Grape Paradise on the acquisition of the Sarment Group in the China Mainland territories.
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.
Charlotte Duly writes for Intellectual Property Magazine on the implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision in SkyKick on both bad faith and specification drafting
Trademark law was dominated by SkyKick in 2020 and it was in the spotlight again in 2021 following a Court of Appeal judgment in July.