2018: a question of governance in sport
The last 12 months have seen a continuation of the explosive growth and commercialisation of the sports sector. As sport and business go increasingly hand-in-hand, controversies over governance and accountability of those running sports organisations are increasing. As such, 2018 is likely to see a marked focus on governance in sport.
Recently, sports governing bodies have begun to analyse their governance structures with a view to modernising them. As the market in which they operate changes, so too does the realisation that often the structures that are in place are not fit for purpose. Furthermore, privately held sports organisations are often run without input from the multitude of stakeholders that may hold an interest.
Regulatory, commercial and public pressures are changing the landscape and leading to reform. This article looks at some of the drivers of change and the likely impact in 2018.
Pressure from sponsors
As sport becomes increasingly commercialised, the sponsors investing their money and reputation in the sector are becoming more demanding of the organisations they partner with. Sponsors demand greater transparency prior to entering into arrangements and may exercise termination rights in event of high profile governance failures.
Recourse to the law
Three recent cases highlight how legal action has been taken in an attempt to remedy purported governance deficiencies in sports organisations:
- In November 2017, a minority shareholder in Blackpool Football Club was successful in bringing an unfair prejudice action and obtaining a court order that required the majority shareholder to buy him out. The case related to the majority shareholder ignoring decision-making structures and declaring dividends that did not benefit the club.
- Swansea footballer Wilfried Bony is engaged in an ongoing legal dispute with two former agents who used to represent him. Bony is alleging that undisclosed commission was paid to the agents. Swansea (who Bony re-joined in August 2017) were originally part of the action, but the claim against Swansea was settled. The case highlights the increasing pressure on clubs in relation to payments made to agents. If Bony is successful in court, further actions of this kind may follow in 2018.
- Cyclist Jess Varnish is involved in an on-going legal battle with British Cycling and UK Sport relating to her treatment whilst on the elite performance program. An independent review, published in June of last year, reported that good governance was lacking in the sport. 2018 is likely to see other sports governing bodies assess their own governance structures in light of this, and other, reports on the topic. However 2018 will likely see further controversy and legal cases in this area.
Code for Sports Governance
In October 2016, UK Sport and Sport England published the “Code for Sports Governance”, which creates binding governance requirements for all sports organisations from elite to grass roots, including performance programs for Olympic sports, that want to receive UK Sport or Sport England funding. For bodies receiving funding over multiple years and in excess of £1m, the requirements included the following (non-exhaustive):
- Maximum periods of tenure for board directors;
- 25% of board members needing to be independent;
- To have non-executive directors; and
- To target and take appropriate action to encourage a minimum of 30% of each gender on boards.
During 2017 many organisations took steps to amend constitutions and processes to become ‘code compliant’ ahead of the soft deadline of October 2017. This process was often fraught and involved curtailing the historic power of membership councils. Table Tennis England saw its funding briefly suspended in July when its members rejected the necessary reform package (a decision which was subsequently reversed). 2018 will see the further implementation of the reforms, with many board members being required to step down due to tenure limits expiring and new independent, non-executive director positions being filled.
Internal standards
Many sports organisations recognise the reputational and commercial risks where governance concerns arise and are proactively reviewing procedures.
For example, the Football Association recently ended its sponsorship arrangement with Ladbrokes due to the perceived conflict of interest with the FA’s role as the enforcer of Rules prohibiting footballers from gambling. Additionally, in December 2017 World Rugby announced it will undertake a review of its process for awarding World Cup tournaments, after its members rejected the recommendation of an independent evaluation in a secret ballot when awarding the 2023 tournament to France.
The increasing frequency of affected persons challenging decisions of sports bodies (typically through internal appeals procedures) is continuing to influence standards in governance. Requirements of transparency and accountability are becoming embedded in updated policies and procedures.
Summary
The numerous regulatory and commercial drivers will ensure that governance continues to be a major focus for the sports sector in the 12 months ahead.
For more information, please contact Richard Davies on +44 (0)20 7427 6732 or at Richard.Davies@crsblaw.com.
Our thinking
Nick White
COVID-19 Certification: Why do the Sport and Retail sectors disagree?
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 7 April 2021
This week's competition update.
Rahim Hirji
No ticket, no merger: Viagogo and StubHub are one step closer to merging but must satisfy the CMA’s conditions
The £3.2bn acquisition of online ticketing company Stubhub by one of its competitors, Viagogo is one step closer to being finalised.
Paul Henty
Client alert: Construction under competition law spotlight
We outline the three investigations which have either recently concluded or are ongoing together with what this means for businesses.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 31 March 2021
This week's competition update.
Mark Bailey
CIS General Insurance Limited v IBM United Kingdom Limited - An analysis
Slow and chaotic – lessons from a digital transformation disaster in CIS General Insurance Limited v IBM United Kingdom Limited.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 24 March 2021
This week's competition update.
Adrian Mayer
Charles Russell Speechlys, Strategic Partners of the Asoko Insight West Africa's Family-Owned Business Report
The report is the most comprehensive study of Family-Owned Businesses throughout West Africa.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 17 March 2021
This week's competition update.
Anna Sowerby
Can linking to copyright material be restricted? Yes - clarity at last.
The Court of Justice of the European Union held that a copyright owner could indeed restrict linking to material.
Tanya Wilkie
Age Appropriate Design Code - Are You Ready?
The Age Appropriate Design Code aims to help ensure that children’s privacy is protected online.
Kerry Stares
Doing Business Responsibly: Food & Beverage
A return to growth will be a priority post-pandemic for F&B businesses, and doing business responsibly could help you to achieve it
Darren Bailey
Darren Bailey quoted by SportsPro on the UK government’s ongoing review of gambling sponsorship
A new code of conduct for betting firms rather than an outright ban on sports sponsorship is the likely way forward.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 10 March 2021
This week's latest competition update.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 3 March 2021
This week's competition update.
Nia John
Ransomware: Proceed with Caution
It has been a busy few weeks for hackers and cybercrime specialists around the world.
Daniel McDonagh
Transfer of Power: Brexit and the Football Transfer Market
Nowhere in football will the effect of Brexit more keenly be felt than in the transfer market.
Paul Stone
Focus Antitrust - 24 February 2021
Our weekly competition update.
Daniel McDonagh
The EPL's Fantasy Nightmare
Freddie Law
Advertising Standards: An Update
An update on advertising standards.