The legal reality of virtual art sales
Online art sales are being billed as a fastgrowing section of the art market with commentators reporting that the online art market grew by an estimated 24% last year to $3.27 billion, fuelled by strong growth among a number of online art platforms.
But where the sale moves from a traditional auction house to the virtual one there are a number of additional considerations arising under consumer and distance selling laws which online sellers need to be alert to.
The most significant area of legislation impacting this area is The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013. The Regulations apply to all "distance contracts" and "off-premises" contracts with consumers, except for certain specific exemptions (such as gambling, banking or credit services), and so are key for online businesses. They set out the information which must be provided to consumers before a contract for the sale of goods can be said to be binding with the consumer as well as any mandatory cancellation rights.
Under the hammer
The usual principle at auction is that once the hammer falls you are bound to buy the item you bid on and any cancelation rights arising out of consumer law do not apply. However, this is not the case for most online auctions due the fact that there is no possibility for the consumer to attend the sale in person.
The important point to note here is that the cancellation right is not applicable where the sale can be said to fall within the definition of a public auction.
A public auction is defined as a method of sale where:
- goods or services are offered by a trader to consumers through a transparent, competitive bidding procedure run by an auctioneer
- the consumers attend or are given the possibility to attend in person
- the successful bidder is bound to purchase the goods or services.
The difficulty, of course, for online auctions is that by their very nature purchasers will not usually attend the auction in person (unless run as an add-on to a physical auction). This means that the cancellation right would apply.
Stand or deliver - expectations
In those cases where there is no public auction, the buyer must be given a cooling–off period during which they can cancel the sale contract of the lot up to 14 days after they or a person they authorise (other than the carrier) take physical possession of it. The cancellation could be for any reason and there would be no liability incurred for doing so.
There are some welcome exceptions here, for example, the seller has no obligation to refund premium delivery charges if the consumer chose a more than standard delivery method.
A couple of other points to watch out for include the fact that the Regulations also provide a long list of the information that must be provided to the consumer on or before delivery, including details of cancellation rights and returns and a mandatory cancellation form which the consumer may use to cancel the contract.
The mandatory cancellation right clearly presents challenges for auctioneers and is highly disruptive to the traditional business model.
As the online presence from galleries and auctioneers increases this may cause some to consider alternative methods by which they can adapt to the online environment.
This may include the option to 'buy now', a move towards a fixed price strategy, or attempting to circumvent the Regulations by allowing purchasers to theoretically attend an auction space in person. This could perhaps be achieved with some form of 'live-streaming', but how this will play out in practice is yet to be seen.
This article was written by Christina Fleming, Associate.
For more information, please contact Christina on +44 (0)20 7427 1022 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
2020: Influencer, 2021: Creative Director – what could go wrong?
Coded messages for landlords and tenants
“What does the code of practice mean for landlords and tenants? Read more here”
Jason Saiban writes for Food Manufacture on the food industry's climate change challenge
The key challenge will be how the environmental targets are actually met.
Grab the tail by the horns - Why is tail spend so critical in today’s outsourced portfolio?
It’s usually invisible, but in all likelihood, you’ve got tail spend.
Olivia Crane writes for The Grocer on the importance of robust data protection policies for checkout-less stores
The ‘personal data footprint’ created by this type of service and technology isn’t something that should be overlooked.
Consumers’ unwitting assumptions: A [wh]iskey business in brand competition
Olivia and Anna look at the Liverpool Gin Distillery Ltd v Sazerac Brands LLC case and the question of 'indirect confusion'
Mark Hill writes for In-House Community Magazine on solutions templating, a new priority for in-house legal teams
Removing the burden from legal teams, contract managers and administrators.
Olivia Crane quoted by SoGlos on the increasing issue of cyber fraud being faced by businesses in Gloucestershire
Cyber fraud has cost Gloucestershire businesses around £369,800 in the last 13 months.
Tattoos, athletes and image rights
Campaigns featuring athletes often include visible tattoos and a number of recent legal cases demonstrate the issues that may arise.
Blue Sky Linking
Daniel looks at Sky's recent success in obtaining interim protection from infringement of their broadcast rights
Charles Russell Speechlys advises on the sale of No.1 Lounges Ltd to SwissportALD
SwissportALD will run nine No.1 Lounge properties at the UK’s London Heathrow, London Gatwick, and Birmingham airports.
Don’t Gamble on Bingo Ads, Warns ASA
The ASA has issued a reminder to advertisers that bingo adverts will be treated as gambling ads for the purpose of standards regulation.
Recording Phone Calls: Don’t take Consent for Granted
What if an interviewee who is being called and interviewed “live” does not actually know he/she is on live television?
Continuing Progress in the Sphere of Inclusive and Non-Discriminatory Advertising
The latest developments from the ASA, CAP and BCAP relating to the advertising regulators’ attempts to tackle discrimination in advertising.
eCommerce and the Post-Brexit State of Play
Key UK and EU legislation governing how online platforms deal with consumers and their business users.
Michael Powner and Laurence Whymark write for The Caterer on the implications of the new tipping laws on the hospitality industry
Operators will soon have to pass on tips to staff without deductions.
UK and EU launch two-pronged attack into whether Facebook is abusing a dominant market position
The CMA and the European Commission have said that they intend to work together closely as their respective investigations develop.
Jason Saiban and Caroline Swain among contributors to the ICLG Guide on Digital Business Laws and Regulations in the UK
An overview of the laws and regulations for digital businesses operating in the UK.
Draft Online Safety Bill: Regulating the online world
On 12 May 2021, the UK government published the draft Online Safety Bill...
Anna Sowerby writes for The Fashion Law on the new collaborative approach being taken by luxury brands and online platforms to fight fakes
Online platforms are now under pressure to be more proactive in their approach to tackling the ever-escalating issue of counterfeit goods.