When is a contract unfair?
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has recently published research which reveals that 54% of businesses surveyed do not fully understand the rules on unfair terms.
Unfair terms in consumer contracts are not generally enforceable. This is an important element of UK consumer law that aims to redress the imbalance between commercial businesses and consumers (who often have no choice but to accept the businesses' terms of sale).
It is important to both businesses and consumers that their terms are 'fair', not least to provide certainty that the contract can be relied upon in the event of a dispute.
According to CMA guidance, a term is unfair 'if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations under the contract to the detriment of the consumer'.
Schedule 2 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 sets out terms which may be regarded as unfair, commonly known as the 'Grey List'. These include terms such as excluding liability for personal injury or death, or imposing disproportionately high penalty fees for breaches of the contract by the consumer.
Some of the findings from the survey include:
- Awareness of the rules around Unfair Contract Terms is relatively low (with 54% of business reporting that they did not know them well or had never heard of them at all).
- Knowledge of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 was even lower (only 15% were familiar with it).
- On average, one in seven businesses reported practising at least five potentially unfair behaviours – the most common being taking deposits or advanced payments and limiting business liability.
- It was not uncommon for businesses to think that the signed contract is final, not realising that there are scenarios in which they would not be able to enforce terms against consumers.
- More than 50% of businesses surveyed have had a dispute in the past over their terms, though only a small number reported having disputes occasionally or often.
- A third of businesses surveyed who admitted to using cancellation charges reported that they had experienced a dispute about the payment of these charges, revealing the potential complications with levying these charges.
The full report is available here for further reading.
The CMA has a detailed, 142 page, document that advises businesses on unfair terms (available here). However, the CMA is concerned that the research indicates that this is not enough.
Therefore the CMA has launched a new campaign, with the aim to better inform businesses of the law in this area.
Paul Latham, Director of Communications at the CMA, said:
"Consumers have a right to be treated fairly – and businesses need to know that they can't rely on their terms and conditions if they're not fair.
We know that the majority of businesses want to do the right thing by their customers, but it's worrying that many businesses are not familiar with the law.
That's why we have launched this campaign to help businesses protect themselves against breaking the law, and against using contracts that they can't enforce."
The CMA has also launched a series of guides on how businesses can check their own terms for 'fairness', including animated videos, at-a-glance guides and online quizzes (available here).
This article was written by Peter Byrd, Trainee Solicitor. For more information, please contact Peter on +44 (0)1483 252 527 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Alternatively, please contact Paul Stone on +44 (0)20 7203 5110 or at email@example.com.
News & Insights
Focus Antitrust - 20 June 2018
The latest in our regular series of competition law updates.
Counterfeit websites will be blocked, but there is a cost!
Peter Byrd considers the impact of the recent Supreme Court decision in the Cartier case, concerning blocking injunctions in the UK.