CMA launches campaign against price fixing
In the run up to the pre-Christmas peak shopping months of November and December, the Competitions & Markets Authority (“CMA”) has launched a campaign against online price fixing. The aim of the campaign is primarily to warn online sellers that discussing and agreeing price levels with their competitors is illegal and can result in serious penalties.
This campaign follows the CMA’s recent decision, following an investigation, to fine an online popular poster and frames seller, Trod Ltd, over £160,000 for breaching competition law. Trod Ltd had agreed with another online poster seller, GB Eye Ltd, that they would not undercut each other’s prices for products sold on Amazon, unless another seller was cheaper than both of them. The online sellers used automated price fixing software to effect this arrangement and this amounted to an illegal price fixing cartel. GB Eye Ltd however received immunity from penalties under the CMA’s leniency policy, as they had reported the price fixing arrangement to the CMA in the first instance.
What is price fixing?
The CMA has released guidance to online sellers which can be found on the Government’s website. This guidance includes warnings as to what price fixing includes, which is as follows:
- agreeing with a competitor what price to charge customers;
- agreeing not to undercut a competitor; and
- agreeing not to sell below a minimum price.
It is also worth noting that competition law applies to small businesses as well as large ones. The two online sellers described above were both small businesses with annual turnovers under £16 million.
This campaign goes hand in hand with the CMA raising awareness by other means, including by engaging with online marketplace providers, which are helping to disseminate the CMA’s advice more widely to online sellers, and writing to online companies reminding them of their obligations under competition law.
“Do’s and Don’ts”
Finally, the CMA has released a short form list of bullet points to online sellers, providing guidance on avoiding price fixing:
- do not agree with competitors that you will not undercut each other;
- do not agree with competitors what price you will sell your products for;
- do not discuss pricing strategies with competitors;
- do ensure that yourself and all staff are familiar with competition law; and
- do consider seeking independent legal advice to ensure compliance with competition law.
Consequences of price fixing
Stephen Blake, Senior Director of the CMA’s Cartels and Criminal Group, reminded online sellers that breaching the above guidance could result in serious consequences saying: “Entering into agreements that limit price competition cheats consumers, is illegal and can have serious consequences for the companies and individuals involved….. As we enter the peak shopping months of November and December, sellers should make sure they have read our advice so they don’t get caught out. The consequences for those who don’t can be serious”.
The consequences of colluding on prices may include company fines up to 10% of worldwide group turnover, director disqualification orders and criminal liability, including imprisonment for up to 5 years and unlimited personal fines.
This article was written by Olivia Mackie. For more information, please contact Olivia on +44 (0)20 7427 1040 or olivia.mackie@crsblaw.com, or alternatively Paul Stone on +44 (0)20 7203 5110 or at paul.stone@crsblaw.com
Our thinking
Pei Li Kew
Pei Li Kew writes for Pharmacy Business on the link between pharmacy and IP
Pei Li Kew writes for Pharmacy Business on the link between pharmacy and IP
Jonathan McDonald
Jonathan McDonald provides comment for City AM on the Data Reform Bill announced in the Queen's Speech
Jonathan McDonald provides comment for City AM on the Data Reform Bill announced in the Queen's Speech
Nick White
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Symphony Holdings Limited on the sale of its PONY trade mark portfolio for USD $28 million
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Symphony Holdings Limited on the sale of its PONY trade mark portfolio for USD $28 million.
Simon Ridpath
Simon Ridpath featured in the Lawyer’s Hot 100 list
Simon Ridpath features in The Lawyer’s Hot 100 list
Natalie Batra
Patents and Peppa Pig: What is happening to intellectual property rights in Russia?
Certain Russian individuals and businesses can now use patents, utility models and industrial designs without obtaining prior permission.
Simon Green
International Bar Association quotes Simon Green on the future of the legal sector in Hong Kong
International Bar Association quote Simon Green on the future of Hong Kong's legal sector
Charlotte Duly
Charlotte Duly quoted in Retail Gazette on House of Zana trademark dispute
Charlotte Duly quoted in Retail Gazette on House of Zana trademark dispute
Caroline Greenwell
Nowhere to hide for greenwashing brands
In the UK, regulators are cracking down, with many companies now at risk of financial and other penalties.
Jamie Cartwright
Weighing up the Plastic Packaging Tax
The Plastic Packaging Tax came into force on 1 April 2022.
Jamie Cartwright
Crunching numbers - Mandatory calorie laws come into force
The Calorie Labelling (Out of Home Sector) (England) Regulations 2021 (the Regulations) are now in force.
Jody MacDonald
Liverpool FC’s Hero Club and the current state of play with football NFTs
Liverpool’s Hero Club hit the headlines this week and serves as an interesting reflection of the current state of play.
Rachel Bell
Rachel Bell commented in IT Pro on the implications of the proposed EU’s Digital Markets Act
The proposed EU’s Digital Markets Act is set to require larger messaging platforms to interoperate with their smaller rivals.
Quentin de la Bastide
Constructing a Blue-print for Electronic Execution – New Guidance from the Industry Working Group on the Electronic Execution of Documents
Sonia Kenawy
Claimant ordered to pay security for costs in cryptocurrency dispute and digital assets rejected as form of security
Proceedings that are sure to be watched closely by the cryptocurrency community as well as legal practitioners.
Stewart Hey
Freezing Orders: Policing the Nuclear Option (PT 2)
Looking at the impact these checks and balances have when it comes to drafting and construing the terms of the order.
Stewart Hey
Freezing Orders: Policing the Nuclear Option
This article considered some of the checks and balances that apply when seeking access to one of the law’s most potent weapons.
Mark Hill
UAE Labour Law Update – The five big changes to note…
Federal Decree Law No. 33 of 2021 - The five big changes to note
Andrew Clarke
Charles Russell Speechlys advises Farfetch on its joint venture agreement with Clipper Logistics plc
Farfetch is a leading online luxury retail platform.
Jonathan McDonald
Online safety – 2022 begins with regulatory developments in both the UK and the EU
Last week saw developments within the UK and EU in their attempts to ensure online businesses do more to address illegal online content.