The segregation of boys and girls in a mixed sex school is found to be discriminatory against both genders
The segregation of boys and girls in a mixed sex school is found to be discriminatory against both genders
We previously reported on the case of HM Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills v The Interim Executive Board of Al-Hijrah School and others (see https://www.charlesrussellspeechlys.com/en/news-and-insights/insights/charities-and-not-for-profit/2016/is-a-policy-of-segregating-boys-and-girls-in-a-mixed-sex-school-inherently-discriminatory/). In that case, the High Court found that the practice of an orthodox Muslim school to completely separate boys and girls from the age of 9 onwards did not constitute sex discrimination against either gender, in the absence of any additional factor or disadvantage. HM Chief Inspector’s appeal against that judgment was heard in July before the Court of Appeal, which has just given its decision on the appeal. It is reported at [2017] EWCA Civ 1426.
The Court of Appeal found that the complete segregation of boys and girls in these circumstances was inherently discriminatory, against both sexes. In this sense, boys and girls were not being treated as “separate but equal”, as the school had argued. Instead, the denial of the right of each gender to mix with the opposite gender was detrimental to both boys and girls, as Ofsted’s findings had been that segregation had an adverse impact on the quality and effectiveness of education given by the school to both girl pupils and boy pupils.
A minority of the Court also found that the practice was particularly discriminatory against girls, as it reinforced “the different spaces – private and public – that men and women must occupy, and their respective stereotyped roles which accord them a differential and unequal status, in accordance with the precepts and practices of certain Muslim communities.” It went on to find that whilst an adult woman may freely choose to adopt such a way of life for herself (in which case others should not criticise her or prevent her from living in that way), schools in Britain are obliged to enable and support girls to make a free and informed choice as to how they wish to live their life as an adult. By segregating boys and girls whilst they are at school, this freedom is undermined. However, the majority of the Court found that there had been no evidence put before it to make a finding that the school’s practice caused greater psychological harm to girl pupils than to boy pupils.
The school in question has pupils from the age of 4, up to the age of 16. Boys and girls are only separated from the age of 9. This case does not directly impact on single sex schools who only educate either girls or boys. However, it is possible that the next legal challenge may be against such schools. Watch this space…
This article was written by Andy Williams. For more information please get in touch with Andy on +44(0) 1483 252612 or via Andy.Williams@crsblaw.com
Our thinking
Charity Training: Digital Transformation in the Charity Sector
We would be delighted if you could join us for the second session in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
Charity Training: Brand Protection
We would be delighted if you could join us for the first in our new series of bite-size webinars for charities.
Rose Carey
The UK’s New Skilled Worker & Intra-Company Visa Routes: a closer look
Taking a closer look at the UK’s new visas to assist UK businesses.
Sarah Farrelly
Pro bono partnership between Charles Russell Speechlys and Social Business Trust
Our partnership with Social Business Trust (SBT) is going from strength to strength.
Sara Wilson
Sleep-in workers not entitled to NMW for entire shift
A unanimous ruling by The Supreme Court in the Royal Mencap v Tomlinson-Blake and another case.
Amelia Goodwin
Amelia Goodwin quoted by People Management, Home Care Insight and Care Home Management on the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling in Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake
The court found that care providers do not have to pay the minimum wage to staff for time that they are asleep but on call during shifts.
Michael Powner
Michael Powner quoted by People Management on the implications of Uber's decision to pay drivers minimum wage
Uber’s rollout of living wage will put further pressure on other gig economy firms to follow suit.
Rose Carey
Rose Carey, Kelvin Tanner and Kate Gamester write for Compliance & Risk on navigating the UK's new immigration system
The article highlights the compliance pitfalls and how organisations can adapt to avoid them.
Rose Carey
The UK’s post-Brexit rules for skilled workers – Key implications for the construction industry
As a result of the new Points Based Immigration System , UK companies in the construction sector will not be able to sponsor labourers.
Trevor Bettany
How to manage redundancies: employee rights on redundancy
What rights do employees have when a redundancy exercise is carried out?
Michael Powner
Michael Powner quoted by Personnel Today on the implications of the Uber Supreme Court ruling on the gig economy
While the case is fact specific, the decision is likely to be a very persuasive authority for tribunals ruling on others in the gig economy.
Michael Powner
Michael Powner quoted by Bloomberg, PA Media and People Management on the Supreme Court's ruling on the employment status of Uber drivers
The Supreme Court unanimously found that Uber drivers are workers under UK law.
Nick Hurley
Nick Hurley quoted by the Daily Mirror on 'no jab, no job' policies
'No jab, no job' may seem clear and concise, but mandatory policies requiring the Covid-19 vaccine are far from straightforward.
Trevor Bettany
How to manage redundancies: practical steps
What are the practical considerations when carrying out a redundancy exercise?
Elliot Michaelson
EMI share options, Covid-19, and Brexit – where are we now?
What are the new measures to employers operating EMI schemes that have been affected by the pandemic?
Clare Davis
How to manage redundancies: initial planning
What should employers consider when preparing for a redundancy situation?
Rose Carey
Post-Brexit Implications for UK/EU Business Travel
How companies need to monitor the activities of their employees on business trips in a post-Brexit world.
Trevor Bettany
Trevor Bettany quoted by People Management on the use of 'fire and rehire' tactics
Trevor Bettany considers questions around the legalities of ‘fire and rehire’ tactics.
Anisha Vyas
Anisha Vyas writes for City AM on the legal issues around mandatory vaccination policies
Nick Hurley
Nick Hurley quoted by SmallBusiness.co.uk on the legal issues around implementing mandatory vaccination policies
As the Covid-19 vaccine rollout continues, Nick Hurley considers whether employers can make it mandatory for staff to get the jab.