• insights-banner

    In the Press

Tamasin Perkins writes in IFA Magazine about the limits of “challenge-proof” wills

min read

Growing numbers of inheritance disputes are highlighting the limits of testamentary freedom in England and Wales, despite the widespread perception that individuals are free to leave their estate to whomever they choose. Marking the 50th anniversary of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, how has this legislation evolved into one of the most significant checks on succession planning, and how will it continue to reshape expectations around inheritance?

The Act enables spouses, civil partners, cohabitees, children and financial dependants to challenge a will where they believe they have not received reasonable financial provision. Although many individuals take steps to make their wishes “challenge-proof”, such as lifetime gifting, obtaining medical evidence of testamentary capacity, or careful drafting, these measures do not prevent the courts from exercising their discretion under the Act.

The courts will consider a range of factors when assessing a claim, including the financial circumstances of the claimant, the size of the estate and the obligations owed by the deceased. As family structures continue to evolve, in part as families navigate the nuances of the inter-generational wealth transfer, the Act has adapted to recognise a broader range of relationships and dependencies. This has contributed to a rise in claims and contentious probate disputes.

There is no guaranteed way to eliminate the risk of a claim under the 1975 Act. Instead, individuals should recognise that, regardless of how carefully a will is prepared, the courts retain significant powers to intervene where they consider reasonable financial provision has not been made.

Tamasin Perkins, Partner in our Private Wealth Disputes team, writes in IFA Magazine:

There is no guaranteed way to prevent a claim under the 1975 Act. Many people assume that careful drafting, lifetime gifting, a report confirming mental capacity, or a written explanation as to why a family member has been excluded will be enough to insulate an estate from challenge. While these steps may assist in certain circumstances, they are not determinative.

Read the full article in IFA Magazine here.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Succession, governance and the next generation in US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Wei Kang comments on China’s new tax rule on offshore trusts in The Straits Times

    In the Press

    min read
  • A New Era of Wealth and Estate Planning for PRC High-Net-Worth Families

    Wei Kang

    Insights

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain social audits: what they are, their limitations, and why they matter for human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Technology, AI and US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Reaz Jafri quoted in CNBC on EU crackdown on Caribbean "golden passport" programmes

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitrating Construction Disputes – Comparing the ICC, LCIA, SIAC and SCCA Rules

    Christopher O'Brien

    Insights

    min read
Back to top