• insights-banner

    In the Press

Construction News and Facilities Management Now quote William Turner, Elizabeth Hughes, and Alexander Hemmings on new Construction Industry Scheme rules for supply chain fraud

New Construction Industry Scheme (CIS) rules have come into effect which mean that contractors must be more vigilant about fraud happening in their supply chains. The recent changes to the CIS, which governs tax deductions from payments by contractors to subcontractors, are aimed at streamlining CIS administration and preventing fraud facilitated through CIS payments. 

The new parameters mean that any company found to have known or which should have known it was involved in fraudulent transactions will instantly lose its gross payment status (GPS) with HMRC for at least five years. Directors could also face personal penalties.

This scheme intends to reduce the risk of fraud, and the non-payment of tax. If tax fraud is uncovered in a supply chain, HMRC can make the business liable for any lost tax, including National Insurance and PAYE, which has been evaded by unscrupulous subcontractors.

Elizabeth Hughes, Counsel in our Corporate Tax team, William Turner, Associate, and Alexander Hemmings, Paralegal, both in our Construction, Engineering and Projects team, are quoted in Construction News and Facilities Management Now:  

Not knowing about a subcontractor’s fraudulent tax activities is no defence. To protect their position, contractors and subcontractors should conduct comprehensive due diligence on their counterparties.

Read the full articles in Construction News and Facilities Management Now, and find our team's full insights on the topic here.

Our thinking

  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Choosing the Right PISCES Platform for Private Company Liquidity

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

  • Q&A: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • Grid Connections, Environmental Assessment and the DCO Process – What is the effect of the Raeshaw Farms judgement?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Eddie Richards and Sadie Pitman write for Logistics Business on the UK's readiness for an electric vehicle revolution

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

  • Q&A: Boundary Issues

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Remedy and Leverage: Addressing Human Rights Risks in Corporate Supply Chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2026

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • How is the UK Construction Industry Impacted by Modern Slavery?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Application for modification of restrictive covenant fails on “worst case” scenario

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • IFLR interviews Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson on our role advising the first PISCES share sale

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    In the Press

  • Social risks in the supply chain – from due diligence to resilience: Corporate human rights due diligence – a snapshot of the law in EU/UK

    Kerry Stares

    Podcasts

  • Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

    Willemijn Paul

    Quick Reads

  • The 1975 Act 50 Years On: Looking Back and Looking Forward

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • Growing investor focus on human rights and social sustainability

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • What assets can a Family Investment Company (FIC) hold?

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

Back to top