• insights-banner

    In the Press

The Telegraph quotes Charlotte Hill on sale-and-rent-back schemes

min read

What happens when a solution to pay off mortgage debt is too good to be true? The Telegraph has reported on the experience of homeowners who were caught out by a 'manipulative' non-authorised sale-and-rent-back scheme.

In principle, a sale-and-rent-back scheme can allow homeowners who are struggling to afford their mortgage, to sell their property and continue living there as a tenant while looking to buy a smaller home with the proceeds of the sale. Unfortunately, however, some homeowners under threat of repossession have fallen into the trap of unauthorised sale-and-rent-back schemes.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has identified 29 victims of Secure Property Consultants, whose director Rajinder Gill was jailed for two-and-a-half years after a hearing at Southwark Crown Court on March 10. From September 2014 to November 2018, Gill ran an unauthorised sale-and-rent-back scheme, targeting vulnerable homeowners in financial difficulty across Britain. In most cases, he offered to provide loans to his victims for the purpose of paying off their immediate arrears. Many were unaware of the high interest and high fees attached to these loans. 

Other victims agreed to sell their properties to associates of Gill, having been promised that they could remain as tenants once the transaction was completed. Around 10 victims were subsequently evicted. Additionally, the scheme deliberately sold homes for far less than they were worth, leaving many victims with significantly less equity from the sale than expected, and various knock-on financial troubles.

Charlotte Hill, Partner in our Financial Services Regulation and Funds team, comments in the piece on warning signs to look out for, in the event that a homeowner is considering a sale-and-rent-back agreement.

As a rule of thumb, if someone is offering a rapid solution to mortgage distress but is asking you to give up ownership of your home, that is something that should always prompt very careful scrutiny.

"One of the biggest warning signs is when a homeowner is encouraged to sell their property at a substantial discount and rely on promises that they will be able to remain in the property indefinitely. Consumers should check whether the provider is authorised by the FCA to carry out sale-and-rent-back activity and should take independent legal advice before agreeing to any arrangement.

Read the full article in The Telegraph here (subscription required).

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain: social audits

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Technology, AI and US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitrating Construction Disputes – Comparing the ICC, LCIA, SIAC and SCCA Rules

    Christopher O'Brien

    Insights

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
  • What last week’s Bank of England decision means for private capital stakeholders

    Philip Withey

    Insights

    min read
  • Corporate Deal Highlights - A spotlight on H1 2026

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

    min read
  • Anna Sowerby writes in City AM about the implications for sponsorship agreements when sporting events are cancelled

    Anna Sowerby

    In the Press

    min read
  • Phillip Colasanto authors article in Tax Notes Federal on strengthening procedural protections for third parties in IRS collections

    In the Press

    min read
  • European Supervisory Authorities publish first Joint Report on Major ICT incidents under DORA: Key lessons and practical recommendations for ICT contracting

    Courtney Benard

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top