• insights-banner

    In the Press

Jue Jun Lu writes for LexisNexis Arbitration UK on key reforms under newly revised arbitration law in China

min read

China has introduced a landmark overhaul of its arbitration framework with the release of the 2025 PRC Arbitration Law, marking the first major revision since the legislation was originally enacted.

The reforms, due to take effect on 1 March 2026, aim to modernise arbitral practice and strengthen China’s position as a venue for international dispute resolution.

Following the consultation process in 2021 and various draft proposals in 2024, the 2025 PRC Arbitration Law marks the first major overhaul of the current Arbitration Law since it came into force in 1995. The reforms introduced in the 2025 PRC Arbitration Law form part of a wider effort to enhance the appeal and credibility of international arbitration in China, as it vies for greater involvement in the resolution of cross-border commercial and investment treaty disputes.

Jue Jun Lu, Partner in our Dispute Resolution team with a focus on International Arbitration, writes on the topic for LexisNexis Arbitration UK in a collaborative article with Gustavo Moser and Jennifer Puntis. In the article, the authors look at some of the most significant changes in the 2025 PRC Arbitration Law and assess the key advantages and potential pitfalls of opting for Chinese arbitration as a means of resolving cross-border disputes.

Commenting on he implications of the new law and its reception among arbitration practitioners, the authors write:

The 2025 PRC Arbitration Law has introduced extensive reforms including formally recognising the “seat” of an arbitration, permitting ad hoc arbitrations in free trade zones and for certain disputes, and aligning arbitrator disclosure obligations with international best practice. Additional measures such as allowing arbitrations to be conducted online and shortening timeframes to set aside awards will help improve efficiencies of the arbitral process and enforcement actions in the PRC. These reforms will be well-received by arbitration practitioners and users alike. 

"However, the final package of reform is less extensive than draft amendments previously consulted and the 2025 PRC Arbitration Law represents a significant yet cautious step towards alignment with international best practice. Given this, parties considering arbitration in China should assess the new regime carefully and weigh up the potential pitfalls such as the lack of tribunal-ordered interim relief and the continued role of Chinese courts on the issue of jurisdiction.

Read the full article in LexisNexis Arbitration UK here (subscription required).

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • 9fin quotes Jamie Rhodes and Tom Smitham on the growing role of private capital in football finance

    Jamie Rhodes

    In the Press

    min read
  • The National Security and Investment Act, Five Years On: What the 2025-26 Annual Report Tells Foreign Buyers

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Jersey Trade Mark Reform: What the New Regime Means for You

    Dewdney William Drew

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Telegraph quotes Julia Cox on the growing use of Family Investment Companies for inheritance planning

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

    min read
  • Tessa Bartley comments in Legal Futures about our framework for choosing the right legal AI tools

    Tessa Bartley

    In the Press

    min read
  • Investors’ Chronicle quotes Katie Talbot on the risks and responsibilities of undertaking a trustee position

    Katie Talbot

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in Employee Benefits on minimum wage enforcement changes

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Retail Collection: Reputation management for brand founders

    Claudine Morgan

    Podcasts

  • Charlie Ring and Mike Barrington write for Professional Adviser on how best to prepare for the sale of a financial services business

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Beware the “late invoice” clause: TCC confirms the final date for payment must be fixed to the due date

    William Turner

    Insights

    min read
  • Fraudsters in the Inbox: The Limits of Contractual Causation in Logix Aero v Siam Aero

    Natalya Stone

    Insights

    min read
  • Light Bites, expert nuggets for the seasoned developer: bonus episode

    James Souter

    Podcasts

  • Mace Construct Ltd v Baltic Investment Holdings Ltd: A case highlighting the risk of including tender clarifications and schedules of derogations in building contracts

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

    min read
  • Child Maintenance: Reform, a Key Appeal, and the Elusive Christmas Order

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • High Court interprets repair covenant in Hotel lease and statutory fire safety obligations

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
  • PISCES Platforms Update: Wayve Marks a Milestone as a Fourth Operator Enters the Sandbox

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Building safety update: Progress on future changes, including the recategorisation of certain higher risk building works

    David Savage

    Insights

    min read
  • Drapers quotes Cara Imbrailo on out-of-town retail parks and fashion retailers' need for space

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top