• insights-banner

    In the Press

Claudine Morgan and Hannah Gornall write for Influence Magazine on whether you can be sued for a social media post

Claudine Morgan, Partner, and Hannah Gornall, Associate, in the Reputation Management team write an article for Influence Magazine on whether you can be sued for can be sued for a social media post.

In the last decade, the explosion of digital media has had a colossal impact on reputation management and the legal framework that governs it. Defamation cases have historically only included claims against mainstream publishers and journalists, however, in today’s hyper-connected world, defamation is now a risk for anyone with a social media account. When we post, repost or publish content, we can unwittingly find ourselves on the receiving end of a defamation claim, whether intentional or not. For PR and comms professionals, this presents both challenges and opportunities.

The rise of social media platforms such as Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and others has added new dimensions to this legal issue. We can broadcast content to widespread audiences instantaneously and without censorship. The prolific use of social media on mobile phones also means that digital content can be published in a matter of seconds, often with little thought involved. While social media users can transmit their views and opinions to the world at large, most are unaware of the potential legal ramifications. Emotion fuelled keyboard rampage, can have significantly damaging and expensive legal consequences.

Read the full article in Influence Magazine here.

Our thinking

  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: In conversation with Wendy Edwards and Karen Ellis

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

  • Choosing the Right PISCES Platform for Private Company Liquidity

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

  • Q&A: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • Grid Connections, Environmental Assessment and the DCO Process – What is the effect of the Raeshaw Farms judgement?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Construction News and Facilities Management Now quote William Turner, Elizabeth Hughes, and Alexander Hemmings on new Construction Industry Scheme rules for supply chain fraud

    Elizabeth Hughes

    In the Press

  • Eddie Richards and Sadie Pitman write for Logistics Business on the UK's readiness for an electric vehicle revolution

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

  • Q&A: Boundary Issues

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Remedy and Leverage: Addressing Human Rights Risks in Corporate Supply Chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2026

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • How is the UK Construction Industry Impacted by Modern Slavery?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Application for modification of restrictive covenant fails on “worst case” scenario

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • IFLR interviews Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson on our role advising the first PISCES share sale

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    In the Press

  • Social risks in the supply chain – from due diligence to resilience: Corporate human rights due diligence – a snapshot of the law in EU/UK

    Kerry Stares

    Podcasts

  • Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

    Willemijn Paul

    Quick Reads

  • The 1975 Act 50 Years On: Looking Back and Looking Forward

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • Growing investor focus on human rights and social sustainability

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

Back to top