• insights-banner

    In the Press

World Intellectual Property Review quotes Dewdney William Drew on the Getty Images vs Stability AI decision

According to World Intellectual Property Review, the long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment landed with more of an anti-climactic thud than a bang last week.

After three years of litigation and weeks of hearings, many hoped the 205-page ruling would go some way towards answering the pressing question: does using protected content to train an artificial intelligence (AI) model amount to infringement?

It didn’t, leaving many to speculate that the time is ripe for the government to step in and provide guidance.

But the decision does offer a silver lining for rights owners, providing strategic pointers for those mulling legal action over the use of their trademarks in generative AI outputs.

Dewdney Drew, Head of Brand Protection, shares his thoughts with World Intellectual Property Review

Getty’s narrow trade mark infringement win over Stability AI is a disruptive proof-of-concept that may complicate AI model development.

"The case is somewhat unusual because the watermarking of digital images with trade marks is not universal.  It may be said that Getty themselves pioneered and popularised this strategy and so perhaps they were always in an almost unique position to adopt this line of attack.  Much of the attention in the IP versus AI debate has focussed on copyright, rather than trade marks.  It would however seem that the inclusion of a trade mark ‘spanner’ into the AI ‘works’ can cause it to jam in infringing ways.

"Given that the infringement findings are historic and extremely limited in scope, it remains to be seen what damages, if any, can be recovered but the positive finding establishes a new risk factor that AI developers will now need to take into account in training their models.

Read the full piece in World Intellectual Property Review here

Our thinking

  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Choosing the Right PISCES Platform for Private Company Liquidity

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

  • Q&A: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • RICS Property Journal features Chandni Pandya and Georgina Muskett on service charges for live/work units

    Chandni Pandya

    In the Press

  • Grid Connections, Environmental Assessment and the DCO Process – What is the effect of the Raeshaw Farms judgement?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Construction News and Facilities Management Now quote William Turner, Elizabeth Hughes, and Alexander Hemmings on new Construction Industry Scheme rules for supply chain fraud

    Elizabeth Hughes

    In the Press

  • Eddie Richards and Sadie Pitman write for Logistics Business on the UK's readiness for an electric vehicle revolution

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

  • Q&A: Boundary Issues

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Remedy and Leverage: Addressing Human Rights Risks in Corporate Supply Chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2026

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • How is the UK Construction Industry Impacted by Modern Slavery?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Application for modification of restrictive covenant fails on “worst case” scenario

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • IFLR interviews Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson on our role advising the first PISCES share sale

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    In the Press

  • Social risks in the supply chain – from due diligence to resilience: Corporate human rights due diligence – a snapshot of the law in EU/UK

    Kerry Stares

    Podcasts

  • Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

    Willemijn Paul

    Quick Reads

  • The 1975 Act 50 Years On: Looking Back and Looking Forward

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

Back to top