• insights-banner

    In the Press

City AM quotes Danielle Sharkey on how teams are valued in women's football

Reddit founder Alexis Ohanian has bought a stake in WSL champions Chelsea, the club confirmed earlier this month. Ohanian will have a seat on Chelsea Women's board after reportedly purchasing an 8-10% share (believed to be worth somewhere in the region of £20 million).

According to Aki Mandhar, chief executive of the women's club, the deal is significant. Commenting last week, Manhar says:

This is a landmark day in the history of Chelsea Women and for women's football in Europe and beyond," said Aki Mandhar, chief executive Chelsea Women. This investment is validation of the club's past success but more importantly it is yet another proof point in the market of the persistent growth and potential of women's football.

"There is no greater champion of investing in the future of girls and women's sports than Alexis, and we are incredibly proud to welcome him to the club.

The investment has also raised questions about how to arrive at accurate valuations for women’s football teams. In a new article, City AM asked a number of industry experts for their views on how these clubs can be valued, which is particularly important for events such as acquisitions, disposals and investments. 

City AM spoke to Danielle Sharkey, Senior Associate in our Dispute Resolution team for her views. Danielle explains that the sustained on-field success of Chelsea Women should also be considered in their valuation. She continues:

Driving up that figure is the fact that they are among the most successful teams in the Women’s Super League, having just attained a sixth league title in a row, and the general positive outlook for the growth of women’s sport.

Read the full article in City AM here.

Our thinking

  • Q&A: Signs and rights of way

    Oliver Park

    Insights

  • QICCA Conciliation Rules 2026 - scope, confidentiality and process at a glance

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Conway v Conway: Proprietary Estoppel, Family Promises and the Limits of Informality

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Joe Edwards and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on changes to possession actions

    Joe Edwards

    In the Press

  • Habits to Prevent Burnout in Law

    Rebecca Piper

    Events

  • New statutory guidance on the Modern Slavery Act 2015 for supply chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The UK Supreme Court to consider whether adoption orders can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Extension of Schedule A1 Inheritance Tax “look‑through” to UK agricultural property

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Freezing Orders: how are they enforced around the world? Switzerland perspective

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

  • Freezing Orders: how are they enforced around the world? England and Wales perspective

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Miranda Fisher on the rise in arbitration for divorces in England and Wales

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Family Investment Companies: family values, succession and wealth stewardship

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Through the looking glass - transparency in the family courts (reprised).

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Marcus Yorke-Long comments in Spears on the mediation of family wealth disputes

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • The Results are in: AI on the Front Line of Alcohol Advertising Regulation

    Evie O'Connor

    Quick Reads

  • Technology Sector Lookahead 2026

    Mark Bailey

    Insights

  • Food & Beverage Lookahead 2026

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

  • AI in Advertising: A Regulatory Lookahead for 2026

    Willemijn Paul

    Insights

  • Payment Practices - the latest developments on reporting and late payments

    Willemijn Paul

    Insights

  • The Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023 – practical impact since implementation

    Chiara Muston

    Insights

Back to top