• insights-banner

    In the Press

Rachel Warren writes for Solicitors Journal on the new failure prevent fraud offence

The clock is ticking… in three months, the prevention of fraud offence comes into force.

This new offence has been introduced by the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 and becomes effective on 1 September 2025. As from that date, where an associated person commits a fraud intending to benefit an organisation or, in some circumstances, its client, that organisation could be convicted for a failure to prevent the fraud unless it can show it had reasonable preventative procedures in place.

In an article for Solicitors Journal, Rachel Warren, Legal Director, guides us through the examples set out in the government guidance related to the new failure prevent fraud offence. 

The first example sets out a scenario where an investment fund promotes an investment in a sustainable timber business. In fact, the timber does not come from a sustainable source and the environmental credentials have been falsified. The person at the investment fund who put together the brochure for potential investors which contained this information is aware it is untrue. The underlying fraud by the individual will be fraud by false representation. However, the investment fund may also be prosecuted under the new offence if it did not have sufficient procedures in place to prevent the fraud. In fact, it may be prosecuted even if no-one relied on the misrepresentation to invest, because the intent to benefit the investment fund will be sufficient in itself.

Read the full piece in Solicitors Journal here.

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Understanding Vacant Possession: A Key Element in Property Transactions

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Chandni Pandya contributes to an Estates Gazette Q&A on the modification of restrictive covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    In the Press

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Members of joint ventures cannot unilaterally bring adjudication proceedings on behalf of their joint venture

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Understanding risk-based human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Commonhold: Best Supporting Tenure or Leading Role?

    Sarah Bradd

    Quick Reads

  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

  • Navigating Force Majeure, Impossibility and Frustration under UAE Law During the Current Crisis

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

Back to top