• insights-banner

    In the Press

The Law Society Gazette quotes Miranda Fisher on the upcoming Supreme Court Standish v Standish judgment

The Supreme Court is poised to rule in a case which should clarify the law in relation to the treatment of non-matrimonial property.

The judgment, expected to be handed down at 9.45am on Wednesday 2 July, has been described by family lawyers as a ‘key Supreme Court decision in family law’ which could have ‘significant implications…particularly where large sums or trusts are involved’.

Ahead of the judgment, Miranda Fisher, Family Partner, comments for the Law Society Gazette

This case will be a key Supreme Court decision in family law. We have seen, in line with societal change, the growing importance and regularity of nuptial agreements and more recent family court decisions, that pre marital or non matrimonial wealth will be of the utmost importance in a big money case where the court is looking at sharing arguments. The Court of Appeal has said a narrow approach needs to be taken when considering whether assets, originally in one party’s name become ‘matrimonialised’, and it will be interesting to see if the Supreme Court agrees with this on Wednesday and upholds the £20m reduction in award – heralding a victory and making a clear statement for the wealthier spouse. Notwithstanding the quantum of the reduction in award, given the transfer was made in 2017, only some three years before the divorce was initiated and following tax planning advice, Mrs Standish may have a more difficult argument to run to convince the court otherwise although they may review the quantum of her award.

Read the full piece in the Law Society Gazette here.

Related coverage:

Today's Family Lawyer

Our thinking

  • Sharing the Season – the child-focused approach to Christmas

    Rebecca Arnold

    Quick Reads

  • Was it Panglossian or Painful? A year after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Jamie Cartwright writes for Independent Schools Magazine on how VAT on private school fees is shaping the future of the independent education sector

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • Magnum spins out of Unilever: a clearer investment story but a cool valuation

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Licence to Till: what happens when a ‘Grazing Licence’ is really a tenancy? Accidental tenancies, shams and documents that just don’t do what they say on the tin…

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Georgina Muskett writes for Property Week on the conundrum of green leasing

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • Paramount launches hostile bid for the entirety of Warner Bros

    Grace Hudson

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter: Top 5 Changes under the new Renters’ Rights Act 2025

    Lauren Fraser

    Podcasts

  • DMCCA: What the UK’s new consumer rules now mean for consumer facing businesses

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Transactions at an undervalue: trusts of land

    Roger Elford

    Insights

  • Ministry of Sound Limited v. The British Foreign Wharf Company Limited (and ors): Balancing terms of a renewal lease with redevelopment potential

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises FIRST and its shareholders on sale to Encore

    Mark Howard

    News

  • International Tax Compliance (Amendment) Regulations 2025: What UK trustees need to know

    Elinor Boote

    Quick Reads

  • Helliwell v Entwistle – the (actual) conclusion!

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in HubBox

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Candy Kittens takes a bite as Unilever slims down

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025 – Inheritance Tax (IHT) and charitable gifts

    Richard Honey

    Insights

  • Advocacy: Lessons from The Mandela Brief for International Arbitration Today

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

  • The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on government plans to remove the cap on unfair dismissal claims

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Promises and probate: when is “detriment” worth the family farm and what happens when a promise is only relied on for a defined period?

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

Back to top