• insights-banner

    In the Press

International Employment Lawyer quotes Michael Powner on the upcoming NDA law change

min read

Confidentiality clauses or NDAs can legitimately be used by employers to protect their confidential information (intellectual property and trade secrets for example) both during and after employment. These provisions are generally included in employment contracts but also in settlement agreements on termination.  New confidentiality terms may be introduced to prevent disclosure of the settlement's existence, circumstances surrounding the termination of employment or any derogatory comments about the parties. Properly drafted, these clauses benefit both sides: employees can move forward with a financial package and without fear of reputational harm, while employers can ensure that sensitive termination details remain undisclosed, preventing reputational damage and setting unwanted precedents. Confidentiality is often a crucial factor in settlement negotiations, with both parties potentially unwilling to settle without it.

However, the #MeToo movement brought to light widespread inappropriate use of NDAs which sought to prevent victims of sexual misconduct reporting complaints about acts which in many cases constituted criminal offences. Various government consultations and regulatory bodies have since weighed in on the issue with the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA) publishing a warning notice in 2018 (updated in 2024) reminding solicitors of their obligations when advising on the use of NDAs and providing guidance on what would constitute inappropriate or improper use of NDAs.

Set to enter force later this year, section 17 of the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024 aims to prevent the reported misuse of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of crime. 

While an employee can already break an NDA to contact law enforcement agencies, from 1 October 2025 businesses in England and Wales will no longer be able to restrict a victim – or someone who reasonably believes they are one – from speaking to relevant regulators, healthcare professionals, legal advisers, or victim support services

Michael Powner, Employment Partner, comments on the change for International Employment Lawyer:

The direction of travel in this regard has been clear for some time. Employers have been under a duty to take reasonable steps to proactively prevent sexual harassment in their organisations since October last year. The government’s flagship Employment Rights Bill will further strengthen this duty by requiring employers to take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment, including third-party harassment on any unlawful basis.

"This will involve fostering an environment where victims feel safe and supported in coming forward, ensuring that their disclosures are handled appropriately and respectfully. This law will now ensure that where employers get this wrong, they will face sanctions in the employment tribunals and will not simply be able to pay employees out and hide behind an NDA and thereby permit criminal behaviour to perpetuate.

Read the full piece in International Employment Lawyer here (subscription required).

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath features in the latest episode of the Non-Billable podcast

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

    min read
  • Private equity (PE): How Founders and Management Teams can protect themselves - it’s a marriage of convenience so make sure your pre-nup is watertight…

    Nadim Meer

    Insights

    min read
  • From Pilot to Nationwide Protection: New Powers to Protect Victims of Domestic Abuse

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Court of Appeal case highlights the importance of properly drafted repayment provisions

    Francesca Charlton

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
Back to top