• insights-banner

    In the Press

International Employment Lawyer quotes Michael Powner on the upcoming NDA law change

Confidentiality clauses or NDAs can legitimately be used by employers to protect their confidential information (intellectual property and trade secrets for example) both during and after employment. These provisions are generally included in employment contracts but also in settlement agreements on termination.  New confidentiality terms may be introduced to prevent disclosure of the settlement's existence, circumstances surrounding the termination of employment or any derogatory comments about the parties. Properly drafted, these clauses benefit both sides: employees can move forward with a financial package and without fear of reputational harm, while employers can ensure that sensitive termination details remain undisclosed, preventing reputational damage and setting unwanted precedents. Confidentiality is often a crucial factor in settlement negotiations, with both parties potentially unwilling to settle without it.

However, the #MeToo movement brought to light widespread inappropriate use of NDAs which sought to prevent victims of sexual misconduct reporting complaints about acts which in many cases constituted criminal offences. Various government consultations and regulatory bodies have since weighed in on the issue with the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA) publishing a warning notice in 2018 (updated in 2024) reminding solicitors of their obligations when advising on the use of NDAs and providing guidance on what would constitute inappropriate or improper use of NDAs.

Set to enter force later this year, section 17 of the Victims and Prisoners Act 2024 aims to prevent the reported misuse of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of crime. 

While an employee can already break an NDA to contact law enforcement agencies, from 1 October 2025 businesses in England and Wales will no longer be able to restrict a victim – or someone who reasonably believes they are one – from speaking to relevant regulators, healthcare professionals, legal advisers, or victim support services

Michael Powner, Employment Partner, comments on the change for International Employment Lawyer:

The direction of travel in this regard has been clear for some time. Employers have been under a duty to take reasonable steps to proactively prevent sexual harassment in their organisations since October last year. The government’s flagship Employment Rights Bill will further strengthen this duty by requiring employers to take all reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment, including third-party harassment on any unlawful basis.

"This will involve fostering an environment where victims feel safe and supported in coming forward, ensuring that their disclosures are handled appropriately and respectfully. This law will now ensure that where employers get this wrong, they will face sanctions in the employment tribunals and will not simply be able to pay employees out and hide behind an NDA and thereby permit criminal behaviour to perpetuate.

Read the full piece in International Employment Lawyer here (subscription required).

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for IFA Magazine on risks arising from the intersection of family wealth and commercial lending

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: how to prepare for Martyn’s Law

    Ben Butterworth

    Podcasts

  • Iwan Thomas explores Nestlé’s ice cream exit in Food Manufacture

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises TPE on first PISCES share sale: Unlocking Liquidity in Oxford Science Enterprises

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    News

  • The Financial Times quotes Kelvin Tanner on increasing application rates for British citizenship

    Kelvin Tanner

    In the Press

  • Why the UK Remains Attractive to US Wealth Owners

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Big Changes to Packaging Waste Rules in UK and EU Supply Chains

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

Back to top