• insights-banner

    In the Press

The Law Society Gazette quotes Mary Bagnall on Aldi’s infringement of Thatchers’ trademark

min read

Thatchers Cider has won its trademark infringement appeal against supermarket Aldi after the supermarket introduced a cheaper version of the popular drink.

In 2020, Thatchers launched its Thatchers Cloudy Lemon Cider, branded with images of lemons and lemon leaves. Two years later, Aldi brought out a Taurus Cloudy Cider Lemon drink also branded with images of lemons and lemon leaves.

Thatchers brought legal action but their case was dismissed by the High Court. This week, however, the Somerset producer won at the Court of Appeal.

Mary Bagnall, Partner and Head of Intellectual Property, says:

"It is clear that copycat products can gain a competitive advantage by replicating the appearance of already popular and iconic brands and Aldi is no stranger to the consequences of launching lookalike products having been successfully sued by Marks & Spencer over lookalike glitter light up gin bottles.  In that case M&S relied on registered designs rather than registered trade marks.

"Trade mark law provides “extended protection” for well-known trade marks where a third party adopts a similar mark in order to take advantage of the brand’s  marketing and advertising efforts, even if the consumer is not deceived about the origin of the product. 

"Consumers are accustomed to seeing own label versions of popular products, and that is all part of healthy competition and consumer choice, but this welcome decision should act as a warning to discount supermarkets, who are looking to launch competing products to established brands, that they cannot expect to adopt lookalike packaging which rides on the coattails of other companies’ marketing and advertising efforts, without significant repercussions.  

"The Court of Appeal found that it was clear that Aldi intended the packaging of its product to remind consumers of the Thatchers trade mark in order to convey to consumers that the Aldi product was like Thatchers only cheaper.  That took advantage of the reputation of Thatchers trade mark and that advantage was unfair because it enabled Aldi to profit from Thatchers investment in developing and promoting its own product, rather than Aldi competing purely on quality and price and/or its own promotional efforts.

"This Judgment is a welcome endorsement of the use of registered trade marks to protect against unfair competition from discounters.  Brand owners should, however, take advantage of the variety of intellectual property rights available to protect the appearance of their key brands." 

Read the full piece in the Law Society Gazette here.

Related coverage

New Law Journal, Talking Retail, FMCG CEO Magazine, Food Manufacture

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Next Gen Drinks Reception

    Events

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to Spear's on cross-border divorce and succession in Italy

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • General boundaries rule succeeds in boundary dispute between neighbours

    Emma Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys obtains Hadkinson order in relation to proceedings to return a child to his father

    Vanessa Duff

    News

    min read
  • How do the King’s Speech Bills Answer the New Energy Reality?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Options for Retail, Hospitality and Leisure Tenants in Dubai: Re-Negotiating Lease Obligations in Unprecedented Times

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • ‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ Research & Information Services Team wins BIALL Lexis Nexis Award for Excellence 2026

    Jas Breslin

    News

    min read
  • ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’…But It Might Lose You Money: Conduct in the No-Fault Divorce Era

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Darren Bailey comments in City AM about mandatory release clauses and the future of football transfers

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • US – UK Energy Collaboration

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the shareholders of Pooky Lighting on its acquisition by leading US lighting company Visual Comfort & Co.

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • Welfare always prevails? The implications of A & B v C & D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam) for UK domestic and overseas surrogacy

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • Spear's features William Longrigg's views on potential reforms to the UK family court and the reintroduction of Calderbank offers

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Affidavits in International Litigation - Lessons for Trust Companies from a Recent Geneva Judgment

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top