• insights-banner

    In the Press

The Law Society Gazette quotes Mary Bagnall on Aldi’s infringement of Thatchers’ trademark

Thatchers Cider has won its trademark infringement appeal against supermarket Aldi after the supermarket introduced a cheaper version of the popular drink.

In 2020, Thatchers launched its Thatchers Cloudy Lemon Cider, branded with images of lemons and lemon leaves. Two years later, Aldi brought out a Taurus Cloudy Cider Lemon drink also branded with images of lemons and lemon leaves.

Thatchers brought legal action but their case was dismissed by the High Court. This week, however, the Somerset producer won at the Court of Appeal.

Mary Bagnall, Partner and Head of Intellectual Property, says:

"It is clear that copycat products can gain a competitive advantage by replicating the appearance of already popular and iconic brands and Aldi is no stranger to the consequences of launching lookalike products having been successfully sued by Marks & Spencer over lookalike glitter light up gin bottles.  In that case M&S relied on registered designs rather than registered trade marks.

"Trade mark law provides “extended protection” for well-known trade marks where a third party adopts a similar mark in order to take advantage of the brand’s  marketing and advertising efforts, even if the consumer is not deceived about the origin of the product. 

"Consumers are accustomed to seeing own label versions of popular products, and that is all part of healthy competition and consumer choice, but this welcome decision should act as a warning to discount supermarkets, who are looking to launch competing products to established brands, that they cannot expect to adopt lookalike packaging which rides on the coattails of other companies’ marketing and advertising efforts, without significant repercussions.  

"The Court of Appeal found that it was clear that Aldi intended the packaging of its product to remind consumers of the Thatchers trade mark in order to convey to consumers that the Aldi product was like Thatchers only cheaper.  That took advantage of the reputation of Thatchers trade mark and that advantage was unfair because it enabled Aldi to profit from Thatchers investment in developing and promoting its own product, rather than Aldi competing purely on quality and price and/or its own promotional efforts.

"This Judgment is a welcome endorsement of the use of registered trade marks to protect against unfair competition from discounters.  Brand owners should, however, take advantage of the variety of intellectual property rights available to protect the appearance of their key brands." 

Read the full piece in the Law Society Gazette here.

Related coverage

New Law Journal, Talking Retail, FMCG CEO Magazine, Food Manufacture

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • FT Adviser reports on our Gen Z survey and quotes William Marriott and Sally Ashford on the financial behaviours of this cohort

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Building Liability Orders: New Guidance from the Courts

    Melanie Hardingham

    Insights

  • Arbitrating shareholders’ disputes

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • The Wealth Net profiles Sarah Rowley, Head of Charities and Philanthropy

    Sarah Rowley

    In the Press

  • William Marriott and Sophie Clark write for EG Magazine on structuring the bank of mum and dad and family trusts

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Modernising Business Tenancies: Should the redevelopment ground be altered?

    Andrew Ross

    Insights

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • BBC Radio 5 Live and The Telegraph interview Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Georgina Muskett on the future implications of a high-profile court judgment relating to a £32.5m moth-infested mansion

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Claire Fallows on the government's new Planning and Infrastructure Bill

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • PBC Today quotes Mark White on Manchester United's plans to build a new football stadium worth £2 billion

    Mark White

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

Back to top