• insights-banner

    In the Press

The Financial Times quotes Sally Ashford on predatory marriage and claims against wills

In a recent case that has brought attention to the UK's legal framework surrounding inheritance and mental capacity, Jill Langley had to fight in court for her inheritance after her father, Robert Harrington, passed away and left his entire £1 million fortune to his new wife, Guixiang Qin, who was 39 years his junior. Harrington had married Qin, his carer, a year before his death, and had rewritten his will two months prior to his passing, leaving nothing to his daughter, the beneficiary of his previous will.

The court ruled in Langley's favour, finding that Qin had exerted undue influence over Harrington, who was deemed vulnerable and lacking the capacity to make a will. Despite this, Qin still received a significant portion of the estate due to the rules of intestacy, which apply when someone dies without a valid will, favouring the surviving spouse.

Langley's case highlights the complexities and potential vulnerabilities in the current legal system, particularly for the elderly. 

Sally Ashford, Partner and Head of UK Private Client, comments for the Financial Times on the challenges posed by the pandemic in ensuring that wills were made without undue influence.

She says:

Covid placed a huge obstacle to ensuring that a testator had capacity and was not being influenced to make a will. It is likely that we will see many more claims against wills which were made during the [pandemic] period.

The Law Commission is considering reforms to address these issues, with proposals expected to be published that may include changes to the automatic revocation of wills by marriage. However, any reforms are unlikely to be retrospective, meaning that disputes from the Covid era would still be resolved under the current laws.

Read the full piece in the Financial Times here (subscription required). 

Our thinking

  • What You Need to Know About International Family Law

    William Longrigg

    Events

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Rivals: Filming Locations and Considerations for Landed Estates

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • Beyond Dry January: The Rise of the Low and Non-Alcoholic Beverage Sector

    Iwan Thomas

    Insights

  • New food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts Hard Conversations and Smart Conflict®, a Women in Leadership event

    Sarah Wigington

    News

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Sangna Chauhan on the impact of the abolition of UK non-dom status on her workload

    Sangna Chauhan

    In the Press

  • Up in the AI: Gen AI & looking forwards, and backwards

    Joe Cohen

    Podcasts

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Growth Partners on its lead investment as part of a $4.3 million funding round for finance-focused legal AI specialist, Semeris

    David Coates

    News

  • Building Safety: What’s in store for 2025?

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Claire Fallows on planning law reform

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Budget 2024 and its impact on IHT and estates

    Harriet Betteridge

    Podcasts

  • Joe Cohen features in The Lawyer’s ‘Hot 100’ list for 2024-25

    Joe Cohen

    News

  • Appointment of company directors – who can do it and how?

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • A Digital Pound: The Bank of England January 2025 Update

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

Back to top