• insights-banner

    In the Press

LADbible quotes Sarah Jane Boon on the legal binding nature of marriages from Netflix’s 'Love is Blind'

With Love Is Blind nearly back on our screens, the most common question asked is: are the marriages legally binding? 

Netflix's Love is Blind features couples who propose the first time they see each other and marry just a few months later. 

The reality series, which released its newest season today on Netflix, features groups of single men and women who talk to one another from ‘pods’, where they can only hear each others voice and nothing else.

Many watching wonder how legitimate the proposals, and the ensuing marriages are.

Sarah Jane Boon, Family Partner shares her thoughts with LADbible:

In short, the answer is yes. Despite taking place very quickly, the marriages are legally binding, and so there are a number of legal factors that the contestants should be considering before they choose to say I do.

"We’re all hoping that every couple’s marriage works out, but if the relationship breaks down, couples need to have been legally married for at least 12 months before they can get divorced in England and an annulment will only be possible if they have not consummated the marriage. If the couples choose to eventually divorce, they will need to confirm that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. The good news is that the divorce process was simplified in 2022, so couples can now apply for a divorce (any time after the initial 12 months of marriage), without having to “blame” the breakdown of the marriage on one person’s unreasonable behaviour or adultery.

"Another issue to bear in mind is pre-nups. The show does not share information about the participants’ financial circumstances but, if there is a discrepancy or one party has or is due to receive a large inheritance or has business interests they would wish to protect, then they would be well advised to enter into a pre-nuptial agreement. If couples marry on Love is Blind, as the marriages are legally binding, as soon as they are married, they will automatically have financial claims against each other in the event of a divorce, and a pre-nup could help to protect the wealth they had before the marriage as well as any inheritances or business interests.

Read the full piece in LADbible here.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • UK tax considerations for US persons relocating to the UK

    Matthew Radcliffe

    Insights

  • Keeping compliant: Navigating SFO regulations globally

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

  • Valuable assets protection from death, disputes, and divorce

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Insights

  • Q&As: The Evolution of Family Offices

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Insights

  • Parental responsibility = shared care… Or does it?

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

  • Next Gen: Upholding family values

    Elinor Boote

    Insights

  • Navigating Conditions Precedent: a comparative analysis of Contractual Practices in the Middle East and England & Wales

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

  • Relocation: Important factors to consider before moving

    Graeme Kleiner

    Insights

  • The Two Most Feared Foreign Tax Provisions in the One Big, Beautiful Bill: Now Eliminated or Defanged

    Ivan Lu

    Quick Reads

  • Last call for chefs and catering and bar managers

    Owen Chan

    Quick Reads

  • To share or not to share, that is the question. The Supreme Court hands down judgment in ‘big money’ divorce case Standish v Standish and clarifies the position regarding matrimonialisation and the sharing principle

    Miranda Fisher

    Insights

  • The decision in Standish Stands Up for Prenups – Huge boost for prenups as Supreme Court decision underscores asset protection

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Ethan Khurwolah and Simon Heatley write for Thomson Reuters Practical Law on litigation funding and PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Dominic Lawrance on the suitability of a non-dom tiered tax regime (TTR)

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • Bill Gates' Philanthropic Urgency: a catalyst for ESG

    Tabitha Collett

    Quick Reads

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Miranda Fisher on the upcoming Supreme Court Standish v Standish judgment

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys adopts Harvey

    Joe Cohen

    News

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes highly regarded regulatory and investigations litigator Richard Burger in London

    Richard Burger

    News

Back to top