• insights-banner

    In the Press

The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on government plans to remove the cap on unfair dismissal claims

min read

Businesses could now face unlimited compensation for unfair dismissal claims following Labour's U-turn on ‘day one’ rights last week. The UK government agreed in November to drop its pledge of ‘day one’ rights in exchange for rights over six months, an amendment proposed by the Lords.

It has now been reported that Ministers also want to U-turn on the £118,000 compensation limit for unfair dismissal. Currently, workers can be awarded either their annual salary or up to £118,233, whichever is lower but reportedly, according to some government sources, most awards are far below the cap.

Commenting on the proposed changed, Dan Pollard, Partner in our Employment team, explains in The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail:

"Today’s development is frankly bonkers. One of the sensible features of the current scheme is the ability to “buy out” most unfair dismissal claims for £118,223 (or 12 months’ pay if lower). With the cap removed, employers will have no choice but to embark upon an extremely time-consuming and bureaucratic process.

"What could this mean in practice? One example is poorly performing bosses being able to hold employers to ransom. Unless introduced overnight it has the potential to create a bloodbath as employers seek to exit underperforming senior staff ahead of time. Today’s change would undoubtedly make the UK a significantly less attractive place to base staff within Europe.

"In general, given that the measure favours higher paid workers, it is not clear why either the unions or employers would think this a good idea. It may be that the government is “rolling the pitch” ahead of a significant hike to the current £118K limit.

Emily Chalkley, Partner in our Employment team, explains however that there may be one silver lining. She comments:

With the removal of the cap on unfair dismissal claims employees may be less inclined to bring spurious discrimination and whistleblowing claims to get round the statutory compensation cap.

Read Dan's comments in The Times (subscription required), City AM and the Daily Mail.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Caveat Venditor?: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Sale and Purchase Agreements

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Easy come, easy go? A new consideration for temporary non-residents

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

    min read
  • Restraint and Confiscation Orders in England and Wales

    Jana Billington

    Insights

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building magazine about the process of remediation for residential buildings with unsafe cladding

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Owen and Lydia Kember write in Family Law Journal on the intersection of trust law and surrogacy

    Hannah Owen

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake and Mike Barrington write in Finextra about regulatory themes every FCA-authorised fintech leader should be watching

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    In the Press

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Darren Bailey writes in City AM about what European football could learn from the US sports law landscape

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys recognised in Spear’s Legal Indices 2026

    News

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath features in the latest episode of the Non-Billable podcast

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

    min read
  • Private equity (PE): How Founders and Management Teams can protect themselves - it’s a marriage of convenience so make sure your pre-nup is watertight…

    Nadim Meer

    Insights

    min read
  • From Pilot to Nationwide Protection: New Powers to Protect Victims of Domestic Abuse

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

Back to top