• insights-banner

    In the Press

People Management quotes Michael Powner on the upcoming Worker Protection Act

The Worker Protection Act is set to take effect from 26 October 2024, requiring employers to take ‘reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment of their employees.

If a tribunal finds a business failed to take steps to protect workers, it will be able to order them to pay a 25 per cent uplift to any award of compensation for sexual harassment.

Michael Powner, Employment Partner, provides comment for People Management on what employers should be doing to prepare for the upcoming legislation.

He says firms have an “anticipatory duty” under the new legislation, and therefore need to act immediately before incidents occur.

Employers should proactively identify situations when their workers may be subject to sexual harassment in the course of employment and implement measures to prevent harassment taking place.

If sexual harassment has taken place, the preventative duty means an employer should take action to stop sexual harassment from happening again. Reasonable preventative steps will vary depending on factors including the employer's size, sector and resources, with larger employers expected to do more.

He added that while there was no guidance on what constituted ‘reasonable steps’, businesses should ensure they are carrying out risk assessments, reviewing contracts policies and procedures, implementing regular training sessions and providing accessible channels for employees to voice concerns.

Read the full piece in People Management here.

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Chandni Pandya contributes to an Estates Gazette Q&A on the modification of restrictive covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    In the Press

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Members of joint ventures cannot unilaterally bring proceedings on behalf of their joint venture unless specifically provided for by contract

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • UAE Guidance to Employers

    Michael Powner

    Quick Reads

  • Understanding risk-based human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Commonhold: Best Supporting Tenure or Leading Role?

    Sarah Bradd

    Quick Reads

  • AI and Consumer Law: Transparency, Fairness and Emerging Regulation

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

Back to top