• insights-banner

    In the Press

Richard Ellis writes for Finextra on when Fintechs do and do not require FCA authorisation

Fintechs can often be reluctant to look into the regulatory status of their business, fearing that, if they do ask the question, they may get the ‘wrong’ answer (i.e. they may be told that they need to be authorised by the FCA).

Richard Ellis, Partner in our Financial Services Regulation & Funds team, warns in an article for Finextra, however, that while this reluctance is perhaps understandable, such an attitude is unwise. And, in many cases, FCA authorisation is in fact not required (dependent on the type of business in question). 

In the article, Richard explains that "the consequences of breaching financial services regulation can be severe. In addition to the costs of bad publicity and business interruption, the potential penalties include significant fines and even imprisonment. The downsides of getting the ‘wrong’ answer may therefore be considerably outweighed by the downsides of not asking at all, and of inadvertently committing a criminal offence as a result."

Richard goes onto provide guidance to Fintech businesses considering this issue:

  • How do you establish whether or not FCA authorisation is required?
  • Does your business model need to be restructured at all to bring it out of scope?
  • Applying for FCA authorisation in manageable steps, and making use of the FCA's  Innovation Hub
  • An explanation of why FCA authorisation is not always required

Read the full article in Finextra here.

Our thinking

  • Alumni Drinks Reception

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Prima Facie

    Events

  • Token2049 week - what's on the horizon?

    Racheal Muldoon

    Quick Reads

  • My “15 Minutes of fame”, Eddie Redmayne and The Theory of Everything...

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • PISCES – HMRC release technical note on the interaction of PISCES on share schemes and incentives

    Tim Edgar

    Insights

  • Computing quotes Gareth Mills on a major antitrust case involving Google

    Gareth Mills

    In the Press

  • Michael O'Connor and Lauren Fraser write for Property Week on the impact of the Building Safety Act on residential property management

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Martyn’s Law receives Royal Assent – what do property owners and occupiers need to do now?

    Ben Butterworth

    Quick Reads

  • From Double Helix to the Courtroom – A Look Down The Microscope into DNA Testing in Family Law

    James Elliott-Hughes

    Insights

  • The path to paradise or the road to ruin? The Pathfinder pilot in Children Act cases

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

  • Can Labour deliver 1.5m new homes?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Setting Standards: The Ciarb Guideline on AI Use in Arbitration

    Dalal Alhouti

    Insights

  • Risky Business: Lessons in clearing up Contractual Confusion in John Sisk and Son Ltd v Capital & Centric (Rose) Ltd

    Murron McKeiver

    Insights

  • TCC decision on validity of payment and payless notices served simultaneously

    Johnathon Grasso

    Insights

  • Investors' Chronicle quotes Natalie Butler on how to pass on your digital assets

    Natalie Butler

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in LOVE CORN

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Startups Magazine quotes Daniel Rosenberg on the use of AI and technology in M&A

    Daniel Rosenberg

    In the Press

  • Relocation to Portugal: The Portuguese Tax Incentive Regime for Scientific Research and Innovation (NHR 2.0)

    Julia Mauricio

    Quick Reads

  • Estates Gazette quotes Lynsey Inglis on trends in life sciences real estate investment

    Lynsey Inglis

    In the Press

  • Global Insight quotes Shirley Fu, Tom Wong and Victoria Younghusband on trends in corporate activity in China

    Shirley Fu

    In the Press

Back to top