• insights-banner

    In the Press

eprivateclient quotes Sophia Leeder on London’s appeal as a ‘divorce capital’

min read

London has long been branded a 'divorce capital' for the volume of high-value cases passing through its courts, however potential sweeping reforms and wider changes to divorce processes could impact London’s appeal.

How these changes will impact the appeal of London as a forum for high-value divorce cases depends on the factors of why individuals might favour a given jurisdiction.

Sophia Leeder, Senior Associate, comments for eprivateclient:

In international cases where more than one country has jurisdiction to deal with a divorce and its financial consequences, this has led to ‘forum shopping’ where lawyers in London and other jurisdictions are consulted by individuals who wish to see where might be most advantageous for their divorce and financial settlement.

Sophia explains that the reasons why London is favoured in this context include the equal division of matrimonial assets which can favour the financially weaker party, potentially higher maintenance payments for the less wealthy spouse and generous child maintenance payments.

She also explained that the reputation of English courts comes into play, with rules that are thought to be clear providing quicker outcomes on financial matters due to legal and procedural efficiency.

Another appeal of the English legal system is the scope for the interpretation of legislation to change over time as the body of case law evolves.

Sophia adds:

"The discretion provided by the Act has allowed judges to adapt with the times and changing societal norms, for example with a judicial move away from the ‘joint lives’ maintenance orders (where spousal maintenance is paid on an ongoing basis to a former spouse for so long as they both remain living) which were common ten to twenty years ago.

 "However, the fact that the Act has required reinterpretation and new application by judges without any input from Parliament is seen as a reason in itself why the Act needs to be reviewed.”

Read the full piece in eprivateclient here

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Caveat Venditor?: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Sale and Purchase Agreements

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Easy come, easy go? A new consideration for temporary non-residents

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

    min read
  • Swiss Mutual Tax Assistance

    Frédéric Ney

    Insights

    min read
  • Restraint and Confiscation Orders in England and Wales

    Jana Billington

    Insights

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building magazine about the process of remediation for residential buildings with unsafe cladding

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Henry Winter and Jeffrey Lee write in Hubbis about arbitration and cross-border family wealth in Asia

    Henry Winter

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Owen and Lydia Kember write in Family Law Journal on the intersection of trust law and surrogacy

    Hannah Owen

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake and Mike Barrington write in Finextra about regulatory themes every FCA-authorised fintech leader should be watching

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    In the Press

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Darren Bailey writes in City AM about what European football could learn from the US sports law landscape

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys recognised in Spear’s Legal Indices 2026

    News

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath features in the latest episode of the Non-Billable podcast

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

    min read
  • Private equity (PE): How Founders and Management Teams can protect themselves - it’s a marriage of convenience so make sure your pre-nup is watertight…

    Nadim Meer

    Insights

    min read
  • From Pilot to Nationwide Protection: New Powers to Protect Victims of Domestic Abuse

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
Back to top