• insights-banner

    In the Press

eprivateclient quotes Sophia Leeder on London’s appeal as a ‘divorce capital’

London has long been branded a 'divorce capital' for the volume of high-value cases passing through its courts, however potential sweeping reforms and wider changes to divorce processes could impact London’s appeal.

How these changes will impact the appeal of London as a forum for high-value divorce cases depends on the factors of why individuals might favour a given jurisdiction.

Sophia Leeder, Senior Associate, comments for eprivateclient:

In international cases where more than one country has jurisdiction to deal with a divorce and its financial consequences, this has led to ‘forum shopping’ where lawyers in London and other jurisdictions are consulted by individuals who wish to see where might be most advantageous for their divorce and financial settlement.

Sophia explains that the reasons why London is favoured in this context include the equal division of matrimonial assets which can favour the financially weaker party, potentially higher maintenance payments for the less wealthy spouse and generous child maintenance payments.

She also explained that the reputation of English courts comes into play, with rules that are thought to be clear providing quicker outcomes on financial matters due to legal and procedural efficiency.

Another appeal of the English legal system is the scope for the interpretation of legislation to change over time as the body of case law evolves.

Sophia adds:

"The discretion provided by the Act has allowed judges to adapt with the times and changing societal norms, for example with a judicial move away from the ‘joint lives’ maintenance orders (where spousal maintenance is paid on an ongoing basis to a former spouse for so long as they both remain living) which were common ten to twenty years ago.

 "However, the fact that the Act has required reinterpretation and new application by judges without any input from Parliament is seen as a reason in itself why the Act needs to be reviewed.”

Read the full piece in eprivateclient here

Our thinking

  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Choosing the Right PISCES Platform for Private Company Liquidity

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

  • Q&A: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

  • Grid Connections, Environmental Assessment and the DCO Process – What is the effect of the Raeshaw Farms judgement?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Construction News and Facilities Management Now quote William Turner, Elizabeth Hughes, and Alexander Hemmings on new Construction Industry Scheme rules for supply chain fraud

    Elizabeth Hughes

    In the Press

  • Eddie Richards and Sadie Pitman write for Logistics Business on the UK's readiness for an electric vehicle revolution

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

  • Q&A: Boundary Issues

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Remedy and Leverage: Addressing Human Rights Risks in Corporate Supply Chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2026

    Bart Peerless

    News

  • How is the UK Construction Industry Impacted by Modern Slavery?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Application for modification of restrictive covenant fails on “worst case” scenario

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • IFLR interviews Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson on our role advising the first PISCES share sale

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    In the Press

  • Social risks in the supply chain – from due diligence to resilience: Corporate human rights due diligence – a snapshot of the law in EU/UK

    Kerry Stares

    Podcasts

  • Beyond deals: Turning governance into the Family Office’s strategic edge

    Jeremy Arnold

    Quick Reads

  • Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

    Willemijn Paul

    Quick Reads

  • Stéphane de Lassus quoted in Le Monde on tax audits and the role of holding companies in France

    Stéphane de Lassus

    In the Press

  • The 1975 Act 50 Years On: Looking Back and Looking Forward

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

Back to top