• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

min read

Last week, in a landmark judgment from the Abu Dhabi Civil Family Court, the parents in the case were ordered to ‘refrain entirely’ from ‘publishing photographs or personal data of their children on social media, and to delete all existing content relating to the children that harms their best interests’.

This ruling is timely considering the UK Government has today announced a ban on social media accounts for under 16s.

In private children law proceedings, disputes often arise concerning the overall arrangements for children and how they should spend their time - to more niche issues for the family such as: what clubs should the children attend, food and clothing issues and in certain cases, appearances/photos on social media.

There is a growing trend moving away from posting children on social media, but in this case the parents were ordered to ‘refrain from any activity that could harm the girls, endanger their psychological wellbeing or ‘prejudice their future prospects’. Whilst there are laws surrounding the use of social media in the UAE (and indeed the Wadeema law in the UAE, named after a tragic child abuse case, is a specific federal child protection law) this ruling sends a clear statement about ‘sharenting’ – parents sharing photos of their children online and how the court views the children’s privacy.

In this case the mother is a ‘high profile influencer’ but the ruling will have wider implications for all families in the UAE. 

Whilst it has become somewhat normalised to post family photos and photos of children online (think birthday parties, school events and even general life), there is a clear move towards protecting children’s privacy. In this case the court clearly stated the impact it can have – on a child’s wellbeing and indeed their ‘future prospects’.

In the UK, especially with the ban of social media accounts announced this morning, we could see sharenting as a feature of more cases. If one parent is unhappy with the approach of the other parent, they can apply for a specific issue or prohibited steps order concerning this – i.e. an order prohibiting a parent from posting photos online.

It may be that (in appropriate cases) mediation is a better forum for this type of dispute, but in a world where social media is so entwined with our daily lives, parents should be aware of the need to agree an approach to social media to avoid a dispute.

The Abu Dhabi court found that both parents had ‘failed to adhere to proper conduct’ in raising the children (each having posted pictures of them online), and ordered each parent to refrain from any activity that could harm the girls, endanger their psychological wellbeing or ‘prejudice their future prospects’ – including the publication of photographs or personal data on social media.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • 9fin quotes Jamie Rhodes and Tom Smitham on the growing role of private capital in football finance

    Jamie Rhodes

    In the Press

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi writes for We Wealth on when a parent can lose custody of their children

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • The National Security and Investment Act, Five Years On: What the 2025-26 Annual Report Tells Foreign Buyers

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Jersey Trade Mark Reform: What the New Regime Means for You

    Dewdney William Drew

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Telegraph quotes Julia Cox on the growing use of Family Investment Companies for inheritance planning

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

    min read
  • Tessa Bartley comments in Legal Futures about our framework for choosing the right legal AI tools

    Tessa Bartley

    In the Press

    min read
  • Investors’ Chronicle quotes Katie Talbot on the risks and responsibilities of undertaking a trustee position

    Katie Talbot

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in Employee Benefits on minimum wage enforcement changes

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Retail Collection: Reputation management for brand founders

    Claudine Morgan

    Podcasts

  • Charlie Ring and Mike Barrington write for Professional Adviser on how best to prepare for the sale of a financial services business

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • A practical guide to choosing the right AI tools for your law firm: Five Insights that surprised us the most

    Tessa Bartley

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • How US Family Offices are reshaping their portfolios

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Beware the “late invoice” clause: TCC confirms the final date for payment must be fixed to the due date

    William Turner

    Insights

    min read
  • Private equity, venture capital and US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • How US family offices are navigating a turbulent market

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you get a “quickie divorce” in England and Wales?

    Jamie Kennaugh

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Fraudsters in the Inbox: The Limits of Contractual Causation in Logix Aero v Siam Aero

    Natalya Stone

    Insights

    min read
  • Light Bites, expert nuggets for the seasoned developer: bonus episode

    James Souter

    Podcasts

Back to top