• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

New Corporate Liability for criminal offences committed by Senior Managers: Section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026

min read

Section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 comes into force on 29 June 2026. This new provision significantly extends a corporate’s potential criminal liability because where a senior manager commits any criminal offence under UK law, whilst “acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority”, the corporate will also commit the offence and can be convicted and sentenced accordingly.   

The provision only applies to the actions of a “senior manager” however. This is a person who is:

  1. an individual who either plays a significant role in managing or organising the business, or a substantial part of it, or

  2. an individual who plays a significant role in making decisions about the managing or organising the business, or a substantial part of it. 

Corporates should be wary of assuming that the offence will only apply to someone with the title of "manager" or "senior manager".  The term “senior manager” is also not restricted to statutory directors and senior officers.  Whether someone falls within the definition will depend on their role within the organisation and the tasks they perform. 

The phrase "acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority” is designed to capture an individual's actions where they are of a type that the individual was authorised to undertake, or which would be expected to be undertaken. The example given in the explanatory note is where the Chief Financial Officer commits fraud by making false statements about a company’s financial position. 

The offence does not apply in certain circumstances if the offence is committed overseas or where, if the conduct was attributable to the company, there would be no offence.  But otherwise there is no statutory defence. 

This new provision represents a further step towards placing responsibility on corporates for the criminal actions of their officers and senior staff. It extends - and replaces - similar existing provisions relating solely to corporate crime currently found in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023.  It also widens the “identification doctrine” where a corporate can be found guilty of an offence if it is carried out by a person with the “directing mind and will” of the organisation. 

What steps should corporates be taking now?   

Unlike the failure to prevent fraud offence which came into force on 1 September 2025, corporates will not be able to rely on a "reasonable procedures" defence.  This means that prior to 29 June 2026, corporates should carry out a risk assessment to establish which individuals fall within the "senior manager" definition and consider whether there are sufficient safeguards in place to protect the business against the possibility of them committing a crime whilst acting in the actual or perceived scope of their authority.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • The Increased Expedited Procedure Threshold under the 2026 ICC Rules: What Does It Mean for Mid-Value Construction Disputes in the UAE?

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • Case No. 9. Can an arbitration clause be extended to a non-signatory party, and what are the relevant factors?

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, as Liquidator of Awal Bank BSC(c) (In Liquidation), welcomes Bahraini Court judgment upholding liquidator’s rejection of US$2.8 billion of claims and confirming debts owing to Awal Bank of US$2.56 billion

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Forum Wars or Forum Steering? Global licence determinations, cross border complexities, ADR and the next stage of FRAND Disputes

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • New 2026 ICC Rules of Arbitration: what’s changed and what it means

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Dubai Conflicts of Jurisdiction Tribunal Continues to Define the Boundaries of DIFC and Onshore Dubai Court Jurisdiction in Arbitral Award Recognition and Enforcement

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Disputes Over Donuts: Spotlight on the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026

    Thomas R. Snider

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys moves offices in Milan following consistent growth of Italian practice

    Michael Lingens

    News

    min read
  • After You Leave: Navigating Non-Competes and Non-Solicitation Under Swiss Law

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Emoji on trial: Can a thumbs-up waive a rent increase?

    Harriet Durn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Benoît Pasquier comments in Law UK on Switzerland as a leading centre for sports disputes

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Access to privileged company documents: shareholder rule abolished

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Limitation and unfair prejudice petitions: the legend of Zedra

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
Back to top