• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

New Corporate Liability for criminal offences committed by Senior Managers: Section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026

min read

Section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 comes into force on 29 June 2026. This new provision significantly extends a corporate’s potential criminal liability because where a senior manager commits any criminal offence under UK law, whilst “acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority”, the corporate will also commit the offence and can be convicted and sentenced accordingly.   

The provision only applies to the actions of a “senior manager” however. This is a person who is:

  1. an individual who either plays a significant role in managing or organising the business, or a substantial part of it, or

  2. an individual who plays a significant role in making decisions about the managing or organising the business, or a substantial part of it. 

Corporates should be wary of assuming that the offence will only apply to someone with the title of "manager" or "senior manager".  The term “senior manager” is also not restricted to statutory directors and senior officers.  Whether someone falls within the definition will depend on their role within the organisation and the tasks they perform. 

The phrase "acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority” is designed to capture an individual's actions where they are of a type that the individual was authorised to undertake, or which would be expected to be undertaken. The example given in the explanatory note is where the Chief Financial Officer commits fraud by making false statements about a company’s financial position. 

The offence does not apply in certain circumstances if the offence is committed overseas or where, if the conduct was attributable to the company, there would be no offence.  But otherwise there is no statutory defence. 

This new provision represents a further step towards placing responsibility on corporates for the criminal actions of their officers and senior staff. It extends - and replaces - similar existing provisions relating solely to corporate crime currently found in the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023.  It also widens the “identification doctrine” where a corporate can be found guilty of an offence if it is carried out by a person with the “directing mind and will” of the organisation. 

What steps should corporates be taking now?   

Unlike the failure to prevent fraud offence which came into force on 1 September 2025, corporates will not be able to rely on a "reasonable procedures" defence.  This means that prior to 29 June 2026, corporates should carry out a risk assessment to establish which individuals fall within the "senior manager" definition and consider whether there are sufficient safeguards in place to protect the business against the possibility of them committing a crime whilst acting in the actual or perceived scope of their authority.

Our thinking

  • Should You Even Bother? Making the Case for Bringing a Case

    Caroline Greenwell

    Events

    min read
  • LCIA Publishes 2025 Case Statistics – What They Show

    Katy Ackroyd

    Insights

    min read
  • That’s what no one said: DIFC Court annuls award based on unpleaded findings

    Aishwarya Nair

    Insights

    min read
  • International confidence grows in Saudi Arabia as an arbitral seat

    Peter Smith

    Insights

    min read
  • Virtual Currency Regulation: United Arab Emirates

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

    min read
  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • France Modernises Its Arbitration Law: What Does Decree No. 2026-741 Change?

    Simon Le Wita

    Insights

    min read
  • Disclosing Settlement Agreements in Due Diligence: Navigating Confidentiality and Risk

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

    min read
  • Cryptocurrency crime in Switzerland

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

    min read
  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to just and equitable winding up

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust Orders: A Practical Guide to Obtaining Information and Tracing Assets

    Martha Lazanakis

    Insights

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write in the Law Society Gazette about the new corporate liability for criminal offences committed by senior managers

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Caveat Venditor?: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Sale and Purchase Agreements

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Restraint and Confiscation Orders in England and Wales

    Jana Billington

    Insights

    min read
  • Henry Winter and Jeffrey Lee write in Hubbis about arbitration and cross-border family wealth in Asia

    Henry Winter

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Fowl Play: Lessons from Lux Films Ltd v Fowler & Anor [2026] EWHC 963 (KB)

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Genuine Belief Is Not Enough: Supreme Court Confirms Section 172 Demands Good Faith in Conduct, Not Just Thought

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
Back to top