• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Emoji on trial: Can a thumbs-up waive a rent increase?

min read

In the recent decision of N'Guessan v Bewry [2026] EWCC 9, the County Court at Croydon considered a landlord’s section 8 possession claim based on rent arrears alongside the tenant’s counterclaim for disrepair. 

There was one particular point of interest in this case: whether a ‘thumbs up’ emoji response from the landlord could be taken as meaning that the tenant did not have to pay the increased rent.

In December 2022, the landlord served a notice on the tenant under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988, proposing to increase her rent from £950 to £1,200 per month. The tenant received the notice and did not make any application to the Tribunal to challenge it. She told the landlord she could not afford the increase and continued paying only £950. 

When the tenant messaged the landlord to say that she could not afford the increase, the landlord replied with a "thumbs up" emoji as part of a chain of messages. The tenant argued this amounted to an agreement to write-off the increase. The Court disagreed, finding that the emoji could have meant the landlord noted or understood her view— not that he agreed to forgo the higher rent. Accordingly, it did not amount to an agreement to waive the rent increase and arrears of £9,250 were established. 

Whist the Court in this case held that the “thumbs up” emoji did not amount to an agreement to waive the rent increase, the Court's reasoning turned on the specific facts including that the landlord had also sent messages insisting the tenant was required to pay. In different circumstances, it is possible that an emoji could be construed as acceptance or agreement. 

The key risk is ambiguity. As this case illustrates, a thumbs up emoji is capable of bearing multiple meanings: it might signal agreement, acknowledgment, or simply that the sender has read the message. The important takeaway from this decision is that even informal communications could be found to be binding (even though they were not in this case due to ambiguity of meaning). However, landlords and tenants should ensure they are careful in what they say in informal communications to avoid disputes arising.

“I am not persuaded that a thumbs up emoji, on the facts of this case, can be taken as meaning that the Defendant did not have to pay the increased rent. It could simply mean that he noted her view, or that he understood it. It may be that he agreed that she could not afford to pay the new rent – but that is very different to making the next step to agreeing that the rent would not, therefore, be increased.”

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • 5 things English companies and their investors need to know about human rights-related litigation risks

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • The Increased Expedited Procedure Threshold under the 2026 ICC Rules: What Does It Mean for Mid-Value Construction Disputes in the UAE?

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • A founder's guide to SAFEs: fast-tracking investment for UK technology start-ups

    Grace Hudson

    Insights

    min read
  • Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill: Where are we now?

    Lauren Fraser

    Insights

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • Case No. 9. Can an arbitration clause be extended to a non-signatory party, and what are the relevant factors?

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, as Liquidator of Awal Bank BSC(c) (In Liquidation), welcomes Bahraini Court judgment upholding liquidator’s rejection of US$2.8 billion of claims and confirming debts owing to Awal Bank of US$2.56 billion

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Top 5 things to consider when selling your Financial Services business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • New Corporate Liability for criminal offences committed by Senior Managers: Section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026

    Rachel Warren

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can Contractors Resist Enforcement of an Adjudicator's Decision? Lessons from Kingsmead Homes v Laycock Mechanical Services [2025]

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

    min read
  • Forum Wars or Forum Steering? Global licence determinations, cross border complexities, ADR and the next stage of FRAND Disputes

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • The Fire Safety (Residential Evacuation Plans) (England) Regulations 2025: Implementation Stage

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

    min read
  • New 2026 ICC Rules of Arbitration: what’s changed and what it means

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • Investing in the UK Living Sector? Here’s what the latest regulatory changes mean

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

    min read
  • The Dubai Conflicts of Jurisdiction Tribunal Continues to Define the Boundaries of DIFC and Onshore Dubai Court Jurisdiction in Arbitral Award Recognition and Enforcement

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
Back to top