• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

min read

In January, we published our lookahead piece on payment practices, summarising recent changes to reporting obligations and flagging the anticipated Government response to its late payments consultation. That response has now arrived. On 24 March 2026, the Department for Business and Trade published "Time to pay up", confirming its intention to legislate as soon as Parliamentary time allows. The Government describes this as the strongest legal framework on late payments in the G7.

The reforms are aimed primarily at protecting SMEs, whose cashflow is disproportionately affected by late payment. The reach of these measures, though, will extend well beyond SMEs, with some applying to all commercial contracts regardless of the size of the parties.

A Hard Cap of 60 Days on Payment Terms

The Government will introduce a 60-day hard cap on payment terms, replacing the current position under which longer terms can be agreed provided they are not "grossly unfair". This forms part of the wider Small Business Plan announced alongside the consultation response.

The cap applies where a larger business is purchasing from a smaller one. It does not apply where both parties are large, where the purchaser is the smaller party, or where goods or services are being imported or exported. The aim of this cap is clear: protect smaller suppliers who lack the bargaining power to resist extended payment terms.

The consultation had initially proposed a further reduction to 45 days after five years. This has been dropped for now but the Government has said they may revisit this option down the line. The 60-day cap is expected to come into effect no earlier than 2027, with a transition period to allow affected businesses to make updates to their payment practices.

Mandatory Interest on Late Payments

Statutory interest at 8% above the Bank of England base rate will become mandatory across all commercial contracts. Unlike the 60-day cap, no exemptions have been stated. The ability for parties to agree an alternative remedy or a lower rate will be removed.

This is a meaningful shift. Under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998, parties can currently contract out of the statutory interest provisions, and many do. This option will no longer be available.

Large companies will also be required to report on the total value of statutory interest they owe and the amount actually paid. A gap between the two could trigger an investigation by the Small Business Commissioner.

A Statutory Deadline for Disputing Invoices

The Government will introduce a time limit for raising disputes over invoices, applicable to all commercial contracts. Businesses that fail to raise a dispute within the window will be required to pay compensation to their supplier. The consultation proposed a 30-day window, though government has not set a specific timeframe in its response.

For construction contracts, a separate mechanism will be developed to align with the existing payment notice framework under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.

A More Powerful Small Business Commissioner

The Small Business Commissioner ("SBC") will receive three new powers: the power to investigate businesses suspected of poor payment practices (including through anonymous sources); the power to adjudicate payment disputes between small and larger businesses outside the courts; and the power to fine persistent late payers. Fines will be linked to unpaid statutory interest liabilities and could reach "tens of millions" for the worst offenders.

Boards or audit committees of large companies with poor payment records will also be required to publish commentary on GOV.UK explaining their performance and setting out the steps being taken to improve it.

Construction: A Proposed Ban on Retentions

The Government intends to ban retention payments under construction contracts, though further consultation on implementation is expected before a final decision is taken. If enacted, this would be a significant change for the sector.

What Businesses Should Be Doing Now

The legislative timetable remains uncertain. The measures will require a combination of primary and secondary legislation, and are unlikely to take effect before 2027. That said, the direction of travel is clear. Businesses and their advisers should be considering the following:

  1. Reviewing standard form contracts and supplier or customer terms for payment periods exceeding 60 days, particularly where the supplier is a smaller business.
  2. Reviewing interest clauses. Any terms that disapply or reduce the statutory interest rate are likely to become unenforceable.
  3. Assessing internal invoice handling processes. The statutory dispute deadline means accounts payable teams will need to identify and raise genuine issues promptly.
  4. For larger companies, preparing for enhanced reporting obligations by ensuring systems are in place to track statutory interest liabilities and actual payments.

We will continue to monitor developments as the legislation progresses. If you have any questions about how these measures may affect your business, please do get in touch.

We intend for these measures to be enacted and enforced together as a powerful set of legal and commercial incentives against late payment.

Our thinking

  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • Practicalities of Property Management Seminar

    Events

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Court Determined Global Licence Determinations (Interim and Final): Cross Border Complexities

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • Jonathan Burt comments in The Telegraph on HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Miranda Fisher and Hannah Owen write in the Daily Mail's This is Money section on whether you can divorce your parents

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

    min read
  • Keir Gordon and Molly Moseley write in City AM about how high-net-worth individuals can rival private equity in sport

    Keir Gordon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys shortlisted in two categories for Legal Business Awards 2026

    Lesley O’Leary

    News

    min read
  • The CMA’s new supply chain guidance on greenwashing claims: what it means for brands, manufacturers, retailers and platforms

    Hemani Sandal

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Dangote Cement and the Emerging Shape of London’s Equity Markets

    Greg Stonefield

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Key factors to understand when investing in a regulated business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Arise Capital Partners on its acquisition of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

    Keir Gordon

    News

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises BioMed Realty on two new lettings at the Babraham B960 Research Campus

    Lynsey Inglis

    News

    min read
Back to top