• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

We don't need your money, money, money — breaking up with Uncle Sam just got cheaper

min read

On 13 March 2026, the US Department of State published a final rule slashing the fee for renouncing US citizenship by 80% — from $2,350 to $450 — effective 13 April 2026. For US dual citizens and so-called "accidental Americans" who are considering renouncing their US citizenship, the headline is welcome news. But the process of actually leaving the US tax net? That has not changed one bit. 

To understand why the fee cut matters, it helps to know how the fee got so high in the first place. The United States charged nothing at all to renounce citizenship until 2010, when the State Department introduced a $450 fee. Then came FATCA and a resulting surge in expatriations. In response, the fee was increased in 2014 to $2,350 — by far the highest renunciation fee in the world. Then, in 2015, the Department expanded the fee to cover not just formal renunciations but all requests for a Certificate of Loss of Nationality, on the basis that the administrative costs were similar in both cases. That drew sustained criticism and even litigation from groups representing Americans abroad.

The fee reduction is particularly significant for "accidental Americans" — individuals who acquired US citizenship by happenstance, such as being born in the United States to foreign parents who were studying or working there temporarily. Many discover their US status only later in life, at which point they find themselves subject to tax filing and foreign financial account reporting obligations they never knew existed. 

Forget about the price tag, but not the tax bill  

While the reduced fee is welcome, it does nothing to alter the complex US tax regime that applies upon expatriation. The $450 administrative fee is, for most individuals, the smallest part of the equation. Anyone who renounces must file Form 8854 (Initial and Annual Expatriation Statement), and depending on their circumstances, they may be classified as a "covered expatriate" — triggering the so-called "exit tax." Under this regime, the IRS treats all worldwide assets as if sold at fair market value on the day before expatriation. 

An individual becomes a covered expatriate if they meet any one of three tests: an average annual net income tax liability exceeding the inflation-adjusted threshold ($211,000 for 2026); worldwide net worth of $2 million or more on the date of expatriation; or a failure to certify five years of US tax compliance on Form 8854. The consequences extend beyond the expatriation itself: US recipients of gifts or inheritances from a covered expatriate are subject to a transfer tax at a rate of 40%, even decades after the expatriation. 

And even setting the tax bill aside, the renunciation process itself remains rigorous. Applicants must appear before a consular officer, typically twice, and processing times average approximately six months. The real complexity lies in pre-expatriation tax planning, the exit tax analysis, the interaction of US and jurisdictional tax rules, retirement benefits, and cross-border estate and gift tax structuring. The reduced fee is a welcome development, but the fee was never the primary obstacle for most. Breaking up with Uncle Sam just got cheaper, but it is still anything but simple or cheap.

Title reference inspired by Jessie J ft. B.o.B’s “Price Tag” (2011), not the IRS.

Our thinking

  • Under the Spotlight: The Psychology of Witness Performance

    Gavin Margetson

    Events

    min read
  • Wei Kang comments on China’s new tax rule on offshore trusts in The Straits Times

    In the Press

    min read
  • A New Era of Wealth and Estate Planning for PRC High-Net-Worth Families

    Wei Kang

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Private capital, succession planning and cross-border wealth complexity in Asia

    Kevin Lee

    Insights

    min read
  • Reaz Jafri quoted in CNBC on EU crackdown on Caribbean "golden passport" programmes

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
  • Phillip Colasanto authors article in Tax Notes Federal on strengthening procedural protections for third parties in IRS collections

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys reports strong firmwide revenue growth, with 10% increase to £266.5m

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • Kevin Lee featured in Hubbis on private capital, succession planning and cross-border wealth complexity

    In the Press

    min read
  • Home and Dry: How Elborne Kept the Taxman at the Door

    Ethan Khurwolah

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • What Moneybox Tells Us About Price Discovery on PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys celebrates year-on-year recognition in Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2026

    Piers Master

    News

    min read
  • IRS Signals Major Changes to FBAR Compliance and Penalty Relief Programmes

    Michael Steffany

    Insights

    min read
  • Swiss executors dealing with UK assets – what do I do? Part one

    Sophie Hart

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys Opens New York Office and Connecticut Practice

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to TopLegal on the growth of Charles Russell Speechlys’ Italian practice

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Yacine Diallo discusses Luxembourg holding structures on Le Family Office podcast

    Yacine Diallo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Lauralu's management on its sale to Eurazeo

    Stéphane de Lassus

    News

    min read
Back to top