• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

min read

There are frequent media reports of celebrity children cutting ties with their parents. But is it possible to divorce your parents in England and Wales? The answer is no.

The severing of a legal familial relationship is not part of the framework of English law but the question can sometimes arise in cases where a child has been a victim of abuse – a child might wish to go further than not spending time with their parent and sever a legal relationship.

English law does not however recognise emancipation. Severing the legal relationship with a parent is only possible in circumstances where a child is adopted. Parents otherwise retain legal responsibility for their children, and this is most commonly exercised through what is known as ‘parental responsibility’. It is however possible to be a legal parent and not have parental responsibility (for example an unmarried father who is not named on a child’s birth certificate). 

In English law, parental responsibility is all encompassing and includes all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities and authority which by law a parent of a child has in relation to the child and his property. Parental responsibility can only ever be terminated or restricted in very extreme circumstances. And it can only ever be terminated entirely, save in instances of adoption, for an unmarried father, otherwise it will need to be restricted if the circumstances require. 

A peculiar feature of parental responsibility is that you do not necessarily have to be a parent of the child to acquire it – for example, if an order is made that the child lives with a certain person (for example, a grandparent) they will acquire parental responsibility and if a special guardianship order is made the special guardian will also acquire what is considered ‘super’ parental responsibility as it can be exercise to the exclusion of others with parental responsibility. 

Parental responsibility is different and totally distinct from parental contact (the spending of time with a child) and you can retain parental responsibility even if you have no contact with your child. Any parental contact will always be considered from a standpoint of whether it is in the child’s best interests and will meet their welfare - it is not an automatic ‘right’ of a parent.

The other parent, other holders with parental responsibility, Local Authority and even the child themselves (depending on their age) may apply for protective orders for the benefit of the child, or for limits on one person’s exercise of parental responsibility if they do not exercise it in a way that is in the child’s best interests and/or if the child is a victim of abuse.

This is a very technical area of the law and what the appropriate outcome is in each case is very fact specific. There is a statutory presumption that each child should have parental involvement. This is set out at section 1(2A) of the Children Act 1989 which provides that: “unless the contrary is shown, … involvement of that parent in the life of the child concerned will further the child's welfare”.

This was recently considered by the Ministry of Justice who published a report in October 2025 reviewing how the courts of England and Wales were applying the statutory presumption and the impact on a child’s welfare to the court’s application of that presumption. The report concluded that the evidence: “suggested that system practice and the resulting court decisions could leave children at ongoing risk of harm”. Following this review, the UK Government announced that it will repeal the presumption of parental involvement when Parliamentary time allows. It is not always therefore in a child’s best interests for them to have a relationship with their parents.

“Whilst family justice practitioners generally made every effort to centre child welfare across their practice, the evidence of the Review suggested that system practice and the resulting court decisions could leave children at ongoing risk of harm.”

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain: social audits

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitrating Construction Disputes – Comparing the ICC, LCIA, SIAC and SCCA Rules

    Christopher O'Brien

    Insights

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
  • What last week’s Bank of England decision means for private capital stakeholders

    Philip Withey

    Insights

    min read
  • Corporate Deal Highlights - A spotlight on H1 2026

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

    min read
  • Anna Sowerby writes in City AM about the implications for sponsorship agreements when sporting events are cancelled

    Anna Sowerby

    In the Press

    min read
  • European Supervisory Authorities publish first Joint Report on Major ICT incidents under DORA: Key lessons and practical recommendations for ICT contracting

    Courtney Benard

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys has advised long-standing client Derwent London on its building contract with Multiplex for the development of 50 Baker Street

    Fiona Edmond

    News

    min read
  • Dominic Lawrance comments in MoneyWeek on digital and crypto asset inheritance planning

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top