• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

SFI26: What Agricultural Practitioners Need to Know

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has published further details on the Sustainable Farming Incentive 2026 (SFI26).  The announcement on 24 February 2026 can be found here. The headline is that this is a leaner, more streamlined scheme.  There are two application windows, the first opening in June 2026, so now is the time for farm businesses and their advisers to understand the key changes and plan accordingly.

A Leaner Scheme

SFI26 is intended to be simpler than the SFI24 offer. The number of available actions has been reduced from 102 under SFI24 to 71, with DEFRA removing actions that demonstrated low uptake, poor value for money, or failed to deliver direct environmental outcomes. Among those removed are several planning and assessment actions, including CHRW1, CIPM1 and CMOR1, which had moderate to high uptake, but which did not produce tangible direct environmental benefits so are seen as poor value for money.

The retained actions span 14 themes, covering agroforestry, boundary features, buffer strips, farmland wildlife, moorland management, organic farming, precision agriculture, and soil health. DEFRA has indicated that priority has been given to actions offering strong value for money and contributing to Environmental Improvement Plan targets for water quality and biodiversity.

Eligibility and Application Windows

A notable change concerns eligibility thresholds. Following the recommendations in Baroness Batters' Farming Profitability Review, applicants must now hold at least 3 hectares of agricultural land to qualify for SFI26. This addresses Baroness Batters’ recommendation (recommendation 6) that the “Active Farmer Principle” should be applied to SFI to help ensure that scheme investment is targeted at farming rather than to developers or to landowners more widely. 

The application process will operate across two windows. Window 1 opens in June 2026 and is reserved for small farms (those with up to 50 hectares) and farms without an existing Environmental Land Management revenue agreement. Window 2 follows in September 2026 and will be open to all eligible farms. This phased approach appears designed to manage administrative capacity whilst providing earlier access for smaller enterprises.

Financial Caps and Limitations

SFI26 introduces several new financial and structural constraints that farm businesses must factor into their planning. Each farm business may hold only one SFI26 agreement, and annual payments are capped at ÂŁ100,000 per year. For larger estates or farming enterprises, this cap may necessitate careful prioritisation of actions to maximise environmental and financial outcomes within the permitted ceiling.

The SFI management payment, which previously provided a contribution towards the administrative burden of participation, has been removed entirely. DEFRA’s explanation is that the management payment was always intended to be time-limited payment to support farmers transitioning into the new scheme. 

Rotational actions are now subject to area restrictions, with participants unable to increase the area beyond Year 1 levels. Additionally, enhanced overwinter stubble (AHW7) has been added to the 25% area limit cap, which already covers 10 other actions.

Payment Rate Adjustments

DEFRA has revised payment rates across several actions, with changes flowing in both directions. Upland and moorland actions have seen welcome increases: moorland grazing actions (UPL1–3) have been significantly uplifted, with UPL1 rising from £20 per hectare to £35 per hectare, and shepherding actions (UPL8, UPL10) have also increased substantially. These increases will apply to both existing and new agreements.

Conversely, several popular actions will see reduced rates for new SFI26 agreements. Herbal leys (CSAM3) fall from ÂŁ382 per hectare to ÂŁ224 per hectare, winter bird food (CAHL2) reduces from ÂŁ853 per hectare to ÂŁ648 per hectare, and legume fallow (CNUM3) decreases from ÂŁ593 per hectare to ÂŁ532 per hectare. Existing agreement holders will be protected from these reductions, but those entering new agreements must factor the revised rates into their financial planning.

Improved Accessibility for Tenants

One positive development concerns agreement duration. Actions that previously required a 5-year commitment have been converted to 3-year terms. This change should improve accessibility for tenant farmers operating under shorter FBTs, who may previously have been unable to commit to longer-term obligations. It also provides greater flexibility for landowners and managers whose circumstances may change over the medium term.

A further structural change requires base and supplemental actions to be applied for together within the same agreement, rather than permitting supplemental actions to be added subsequently. Advisers should ensure that clients' applications are comprehensive from the outset.

Practical Considerations

For agricultural practitioners advising farm clients, SFI26 demands a fresh appraisal of environmental scheme participation. The removal of certain actions, revised payment rates, and new eligibility thresholds mean that assumptions based on SFI24 may no longer hold. Particular attention should be paid to the annual cap for larger holdings, the removal of the management payment, and the reduced rates for herbal leys and winter bird food options.

Tenant farmers and their landlords should welcome the move to 3-year commitments, though the requirement to hold at least 3 hectares will exclude some smallholders. The phased application windows provide an opportunity for smaller farms to secure agreements before the scheme opens to larger competitors in September.

As always, early engagement with the Rural Payments Agency guidance and, where appropriate, independent agronomic and legal advice will be essential to ensure that farm businesses optimise their participation in SFI26.

Field Notes is Charles Russell Speechlys’ weekly agricultural law blog, sharing plain-English insight into the legal and policy issues affecting agriculture, agricultural land and rural business life. From hints and tips on avoiding agricultural disputes, pitfalls to keep an eye out when planning for tenancy or family agri-business succession, to the latest agricultural legislative or policy changes and the most interesting farm-related court decisions, Field Notes makes the complex more understandable, always grounded in the realities of life on (and off) the land.

Field Notes comes out every Wednesday.

 

 

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Commonhold: Best Supporting Tenure or Leading Role?

    Sarah Bradd

    Quick Reads

  • AI and Consumer Law: Transparency, Fairness and Emerging Regulation

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

  • Navigating Force Majeure, Impossibility and Frustration under UAE Law During the Current Crisis

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for IFA Magazine on risks arising from the intersection of family wealth and commercial lending

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: how to prepare for Martyn’s Law

    Ben Butterworth

    Podcasts

  • The Brocklesby Principle Bites: Occupation Alone Won't Defeat a Lender's Charge

    Lauren Leney

    Quick Reads

Back to top