• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The UK Supreme Court to consider whether adoption orders can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds

min read

The UK Supreme Court will sit today (Wednesday 4 February) to hear the case of X and Y (Children: Adoption Order: Setting Aside) UKSC/2025/0039.

The issue central to this case is whether an adoption order can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds. The Court of Appeal considered this point in November 2024 and concluded that it could not.

The Court of Appeal held that: “Adoption orders are transformative, have a peculiar finality and are intended to be irreversible, lasting throughout life, as if the child had been born to the adopter. That high degree of permanence, from which the benefits to the child of long-term security and stability should flow, is the unique feature that marks adoption out from all other orders made for children; it is, at its core, what adoption is all about. We agree with the SoS that it would gravely damage the lifelong commitment of adopters to their adoptive children if there were a possibility of the finality of the adoption order being challenged on welfare grounds.” The Court of Appeal also commented that “in cases that do not involve adoption, there is no legal mechanism by which natural parents or children can extinguish the parental bond between them, however much they may wish to do so.” An adoption order is to act in the same way.

The facts of this particular case are very sad. The case involves two children, X and Y.

In August 2012, X and Y were placed for adoption with AM. Prior to which they had spent time in foster care, but had significant contact with their birth mother, BM. X and Y did not settle with AM, and they continued to spend large periods of time with BM, including a period when BM came to live with X, Y and AM to enable BM to escape an abusive relationship.

The children left AM’s home in August 2021, subsequently moving to live with BM. In May 2022, X then moved to live with her birth father, having been introduced to him. The local authority issued care proceedings in February 2023.

In April 2023, AM made an application for the adoption orders to be revoked. It is that application that is the subject of consideration and appeal.

Both X and Y are now understood to be living with BM. The children’s position at first instance appeared to be that they supported the application for them to be ‘unadopted’.

We wait to see whether the Supreme Court will uphold the Court of Appeal’s decision.

Does a court have jurisdiction to set aside a valid adoption order other than by way of appeal?

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • 9fin quotes Jamie Rhodes and Tom Smitham on the growing role of private capital in football finance

    Jamie Rhodes

    In the Press

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi writes for We Wealth on when a parent can lose custody of their children

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • The National Security and Investment Act, Five Years On: What the 2025-26 Annual Report Tells Foreign Buyers

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Jersey Trade Mark Reform: What the New Regime Means for You

    Dewdney William Drew

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Telegraph quotes Julia Cox on the growing use of Family Investment Companies for inheritance planning

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

    min read
  • Tessa Bartley comments in Legal Futures about our framework for choosing the right legal AI tools

    Tessa Bartley

    In the Press

    min read
  • Investors’ Chronicle quotes Katie Talbot on the risks and responsibilities of undertaking a trustee position

    Katie Talbot

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in Employee Benefits on minimum wage enforcement changes

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Retail Collection: Reputation management for brand founders

    Claudine Morgan

    Podcasts

  • Charlie Ring and Mike Barrington write for Professional Adviser on how best to prepare for the sale of a financial services business

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Beware the “late invoice” clause: TCC confirms the final date for payment must be fixed to the due date

    William Turner

    Insights

    min read
  • Can you get a “quickie divorce” in England and Wales?

    Jamie Kennaugh

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Fraudsters in the Inbox: The Limits of Contractual Causation in Logix Aero v Siam Aero

    Natalya Stone

    Insights

    min read
  • Light Bites, expert nuggets for the seasoned developer: bonus episode

    James Souter

    Podcasts

  • Mace Construct Ltd v Baltic Investment Holdings Ltd: A case highlighting the risk of including tender clarifications and schedules of derogations in building contracts

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

    min read
  • Swiss executors dealing with UK assets – what do I do? Part one

    Sophie Hart

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Child Maintenance: Reform, a Key Appeal, and the Elusive Christmas Order

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • High Court interprets repair covenant in Hotel lease and statutory fire safety obligations

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
Back to top