• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The UK Supreme Court to consider whether adoption orders can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds

min read

The UK Supreme Court will sit today (Wednesday 4 February) to hear the case of X and Y (Children: Adoption Order: Setting Aside) UKSC/2025/0039.

The issue central to this case is whether an adoption order can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds. The Court of Appeal considered this point in November 2024 and concluded that it could not.

The Court of Appeal held that: “Adoption orders are transformative, have a peculiar finality and are intended to be irreversible, lasting throughout life, as if the child had been born to the adopter. That high degree of permanence, from which the benefits to the child of long-term security and stability should flow, is the unique feature that marks adoption out from all other orders made for children; it is, at its core, what adoption is all about. We agree with the SoS that it would gravely damage the lifelong commitment of adopters to their adoptive children if there were a possibility of the finality of the adoption order being challenged on welfare grounds.” The Court of Appeal also commented that “in cases that do not involve adoption, there is no legal mechanism by which natural parents or children can extinguish the parental bond between them, however much they may wish to do so.” An adoption order is to act in the same way.

The facts of this particular case are very sad. The case involves two children, X and Y.

In August 2012, X and Y were placed for adoption with AM. Prior to which they had spent time in foster care, but had significant contact with their birth mother, BM. X and Y did not settle with AM, and they continued to spend large periods of time with BM, including a period when BM came to live with X, Y and AM to enable BM to escape an abusive relationship.

The children left AM’s home in August 2021, subsequently moving to live with BM. In May 2022, X then moved to live with her birth father, having been introduced to him. The local authority issued care proceedings in February 2023.

In April 2023, AM made an application for the adoption orders to be revoked. It is that application that is the subject of consideration and appeal.

Both X and Y are now understood to be living with BM. The children’s position at first instance appeared to be that they supported the application for them to be ‘unadopted’.

We wait to see whether the Supreme Court will uphold the Court of Appeal’s decision.

Does a court have jurisdiction to set aside a valid adoption order other than by way of appeal?

Our thinking

  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Court Determined Global Licence Determinations (Interim and Final): Cross Border Complexities

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Arise Capital Partners on its acquisition of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

    Keir Gordon

    News

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises BioMed Realty on two new lettings at the Babraham B960 Research Campus

    Lynsey Inglis

    News

    min read
  • Upward only rent review ban becomes law

    Sarah Keens

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Under Oath – Not Under Attack: A practical guide on how to give evidence in the Family Court

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Renters’ Rights Act 2025: Ready, set, go!

    Lauren Fraser

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Access to privileged company documents: shareholder rule abolished

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Limitation and unfair prejudice petitions: the legend of Zedra

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Five Fast Facts: Top 5 things to consider when preparing to sell a Financial Services business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Data Centre Arbitration in the Middle East: Navigating Disputes Amid Security Challenges

    Gareth Mills

    Insights

    min read
  • Tamasin Perkins comments in Today's Family Lawyer on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top