• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

BPR: Why the £2.5 million allowance still demands action before April

min read

From April 2026, Business Property Relief (BPR) will change. On 23 December 2025, the government announced that the 100% inheritance tax (IHT) relief allowance for qualifying business assets will be £2.5 million per person from April (up from the £1 million previously announced).

In simple terms, individuals with qualifying business interests will be able to pass on up to £2.5 million (or £5 million with their spouse or civil partner) of such qualifying interests free of IHT. Any qualifying value above that cap will receive only 50% relief - resulting in an effective 20% IHT charge on the excess.

While the increase is a welcome improvement from the initial 2024 Budget proposals, the rules from 6 April 2026 remain more restrictive than the current regime. Not everyone is safe.

Are you safe?

Many owners of mid‑sized trading businesses can breathe a sigh of relief. Provided they have a good, well implemented succession plan, the uplift may keep them fully sheltered from IHT. However, if your personally held qualifying business assets are worth more than £2.5 million, there is still a meaningful liability to plan for to ensure the stability of your business.

Based on statistics published before Christmas, only around one third of estates expected to be claiming BPR alone are now “safe” from IHT on their BPR assets with the benefit of a £2.5 million allowance, as opposed to £1 million. 

Perhaps even more telling is where the government expects to benefit from the changes. HMRC’s published data indicates that in 2022/23, whilst estates with BPR claims valued at over £2.5 million represented only 6% of claims, those claims accounted for roughly 60% of the total value of BPR claimed—with total claims of just shy of £2 billion.

For those exceeding the new allowance, the increase may not feel meaningful. Take an example: if an individual holds shares valued at £10 million, then—ignoring other reliefs or exemptions and assuming a full personal allowance—the original £1 million cap would have produced an IHT charge of about £1.8 million. Under the £2.5 million cap, that liability falls only to £1.5 million. In other words, the larger the holding, the smaller the benefit of the increased allowance. 

Without proper planning, those with sizeable shareholdings continue to face a substantial liquidity issue on death, with the attendant risks of forced sales and loss of control.

What should you be doing now?

Whether or not you are “safe” from IHT on your BPR assets, you should:

  • Review your Will to ensure it banks BPR where appropriate.
  • Review your wider estate plan—particularly your Will, lasting powers of attorney, and any prenuptial agreements—to ensure they remain appropriate and align with business succession plans.
  • Quantify your estimated IHT exposure under the changes and explore mitigation strategies (for example, gifting, restructuring, or revising investment strategies) and funding options. Mitigation strategies should be implemented pre-April.
  • Test the applicability of BPR carefully before implementing any planning strategies.
  • Review your corporate governance documents to ensure alignment with your business and personal succession plans.
  • Take advice and ensure your advisers are joined up in designing and implementing your strategy.

The increased allowance is a positive change, but business owners with shares worth more than £2.5 million are not out of the woods. The effective 20% charge on value above the cap can still be significant and requires sensible planning now.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • US – UK Energy Collaboration

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the shareholders of Pooky Lighting on its acquisition by leading US lighting company Visual Comfort & Co.

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • 5 things English companies and their investors need to know about human rights-related litigation risks

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 4: Inheritance tax and estate planning

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • A founder's guide to SAFEs: fast-tracking investment for UK technology start-ups

    Grace Hudson

    Insights

    min read
  • Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill: Where are we now?

    Lauren Fraser

    Insights

    min read
  • “A Fairer End to Relationships”: First Thoughts on the Government's Landmark Consultation

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Planning roadmap for expats in Switzerland (2026) Part Two

    Sophie Hart

    Insights

    min read
  • Planning roadmap for expats in Switzerland (2026) Part One

    Sophie Hart

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Hutton contributes to Investors' Chronicle exploring the role of trusts in families' financial planning

    Charles Hutton

    In the Press

    min read
  • Alix Taquet and Sarah Bergougnoux write for Décideurs Patrimoine on the taxation of wealth transfers in France

    Alix Taquet

    In the Press

    min read
  • Top 5 things to consider when selling your Financial Services business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Can Contractors Resist Enforcement of an Adjudicator's Decision? Lessons from Kingsmead Homes v Laycock Mechanical Services [2025]

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 3: Navigating trusts, businesses and investment pitfalls

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top