• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Renters’ Rights and Build to Rent: Top 5 key changes operators and investors need to know about

min read

The Renter’s Rights Bill is the largest legislative change to the private rented sector for over 35 years. On 27 October 2025, the Bill received Royal Assent. The main outstanding question is when the Act will be implemented and the Government has suggested that it wants there to be a smooth transition to implementation with time for the various stakeholders to prepare.

The Act will mean that it is no longer possible to let residential properties on a fixed term Assured Shorthold Tenancy (“AST”).  After the Commencement Date, all existing ASTs will be converted to monthly assured periodic tenancies and new tenancies granted after that date will also be assured periodic tenancies. This means that there will no longer be any certainty of how long a tenant is planning to stay at a property. In the Build to Rent sector where occupancy levels are used to calculate the viability of investment opportunities/return, this may lead to greater financial uncertainty. 

Operators and investors of Build to Rent accommodation should be aware of the top 5 key changes in the Act:

  1. More arrears are required before an order for possession can be sought
    Under the current regime, one of the grounds enables a landlord to serve a Section 8 Notice if both at the date of service of the notice and the date of the hearing at least two months’ rent arrears are outstanding. If that ground is made out, the Court must make a possession order. Under the Act, the mandatory ground for arrears will require at least three months’ rent to be outstanding both at the date of service of the Section 8 Notice and the date of the possession hearing. For the Build to Rent sector this will mean that stakeholders must bear a further period of arrears before being able to take action to seek possession of the property. Whilst this may not be significant for one property, over a whole portfolio, this is likely to be a substantial burden for build to rent landlords.
  2. Reliance on statutory process to increase rent;
    Currently, many landlords agree rent increases with their tenants when one fixed-term tenancy ends and upon negotiating a new fixed-term tenancy. However, under the new regime, landlords will need to serve a statutory notice to increase the rent (no more than once per year). The tenant can challenge the rent increase by application to the FTT (before the increased rent becomes payable). The FTT will then determine the rent under the statutory mechanism which is either the open-market rent if lower than the proposed rent or the proposed rent.  Any rent increase then takes effect after the FTT decision. However, the Secretary of State has the power to make regulations to change the effective date of the rent increase. This provision was added to the Act to allay fears of there being no downside to tenants challenging any rent increase in order to delay the date when payment of the increased rent would be due (even in cases where the landlord was successful in increasing the rent). The other important point which will be relevant to popular Build to Rent locations is that a tenant can challenge the rent within the first 6 months of the tenancy or conversion to an assured tenancy by implementation of the Bill. This could be used to bring down rents if they are not reflective of the local open market which means the Build to Rent provider will lose the advantage of the block being desirable and the rents reflecting that as it will be the open market rent in the locality which is determinative.
  3. Ban on bidding for rental properties;
    In a significant change to the way in which properties are let. Landlords are not permitted under the Act to invite, encourage or accept an offer exceeding the proposed advertised rent for a property. To prepare for this change, landlords and agents of build to rent properties will want to retain evidence of property adverts and offers of proposed rent which they receive for properties which can be produced in response to a local authority’s request to demonstrate compliance with these provisions, once they come into force.
  4. Right for a tenant to request consent for a pet; and
    The Act contains provisions enabling a tenant to request consent to keep a pet at the property. A landlord cannot unreasonably withhold their consent to the tenant’s request.  There is a process which must be followed, with 28 days for the landlord to respond either granting or refusing consent, from the date of the tenant’s request.  When the Bill was originally drafted it contained provision for a landlord to require a tenant to take out a pet insurance product against damage if the landlord granted consent to a pet. However, this was removed from the Bill and the idea of a pet damage deposit was also rejected. A landlord will only be able to seek the statutory maximum deposit (in most cases of 5 week’s rent) in the usual way which would need to cover both any damage caused by the tenant and by a pet (for which consent was granted). Build to rent operators will be cautious about being left with a shortfall where a request for a pet is made and granted and damage is caused which exceeds the amount of the tenant’s deposit which they hold.
  5. Landlords will need to have an active listing on a new private rented sector database
    Much of the detail surrounding the private rented sector database will be contained in secondary legislation. However, landlords will need an active listing to market or let properties and to obtain an order for possession. The secondary legislation will contain details of how entries are to be made, including the documents to be submitted, the requirements for an active listing on the database and any fees payable by the landlord.  This will be an additional administrative and financial burden for landlords and their agents.

We are tracking developments on our Essential Residential Hub and our timeline: Evolution of the private rented sector. Please do not hesitate to contact Lauren Fraser, Laura Bushaway or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact if you have any queries.

Completing the Bill’s final stage today is obviously only the beginning; once the Bill becomes law, we need to implement its provisions. In doing so, we will balance the need to act quickly, so that tenants can soon benefit from the new rights and protections introduced by the Bill, with ensuring that the sector has sufficient time to adjust and prepare for a significant change in regulation. The Government understand the need for certainty, and we will set out our implementation plans as soon as possible.

Our thinking

  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Qatar’s New Preliminary Registration Framework: A Transformative Step for the Off-Plan Market

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

    min read
  • Summer 2026 Update: Where are we are on the Government’s roadmap to Commonhold?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024: New consultations on valuation and legal costs of enfranchisement and lease extension claims

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Leasehold Reform; Government responds to consultation on service charge regulation

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Trivial Matter: What Todd v Marsh Tells Us About Informal Boundary Agreements

    Bella Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • Upper Tribunal finds that a Wholesale Infrastructure Provider did not hold Code rights

    Joshua Hardy

    Insights

    min read
  • Competing Land Uses and the Relationship Between Nuisance and Negligence: Key Lessons from Thomas v Nicholas [2026] EWCA Civ 847

    Laura Bushaway

    Insights

    min read
  • Application for modification of a restrictive covenant where the land had been gifted in a will for a specific use

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • Andrew Ross contributes to a legal Q&A in Estates Gazette on nuisance claims

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs, Conduct & Counter-Offers – Key Takeaways from the Bankside rights of light costs decision

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • High Court interprets repair covenant in Hotel lease and statutory fire safety obligations

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
  • Building safety update: Progress on future changes, including the recategorisation of certain higher risk building works

    David Savage

    Insights

    min read
  • Georgina Muskett contributes to PropLaw on the Landlord and Tenant Act and opposing lease renewal on the ground of redevelopment

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in PropLaw on reforms to property ownership in the UK through commonhold tenure

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • Estates Gazette Q&A: Redevelopment break clauses

    Matt Cordwent

    Insights

    min read
  • Questions on rights of light

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • Solving renters’ rights conundrums

    Laura Bushaway

    Insights

    min read
Back to top