• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Renters’ Rights and Build to Rent: Top 5 key changes operators and investors need to know about

The Renter’s Rights Bill is the largest legislative change to the private rented sector for over 35 years. On 27 October 2025, the Bill received Royal Assent. The main outstanding question is when the Act will be implemented and the Government has suggested that it wants there to be a smooth transition to implementation with time for the various stakeholders to prepare. 

The Act will mean that it is no longer possible to let residential properties on a fixed term Assured Shorthold Tenancy (“AST”).  After the Commencement Date, all existing ASTs will be converted to monthly assured periodic tenancies and new tenancies granted after that date will also be assured periodic tenancies. This means that there will no longer be any certainty of how long a tenant is planning to stay at a property. In the Build to Rent sector where occupancy levels are used to calculate the viability of investment opportunities/return, this may lead to greater financial uncertainty.

Operators and investors of Build to Rent accommodation should be aware of the top 5 key changes in the Act:

  1. More arrears are required before an order for possession can be sought

    Under the current regime, one of the grounds enables a landlord to serve a Section 8 Notice if both at the date of service of the notice and the date of the hearing at least two months’ rent arrears are outstanding. If that ground is made out, the Court must make a possession order. Under the Act, the mandatory ground for arrears will require at least three months’ rent to be outstanding both at the date of service of the Section 8 Notice and the date of the possession hearing. For the Build to Rent sector this will mean that stakeholders must bear a further period of arrears before being able to take action to seek possession of the property. Whilst this may not be significant for one property, over a whole portfolio, this is likely to be a substantial burden for build to rent landlords.

  2. Reliance on statutory process to increase rent;

    Currently, many landlords agree rent increases with their tenants when one fixed-term tenancy ends and upon negotiating a new fixed-term tenancy. However, under the new regime, landlords will need to serve a statutory notice to increase the rent (no more than once per year). The tenant can challenge the rent increase by application to the FTT (before the increased rent becomes payable). The FTT will then determine the rent under the statutory mechanism which is either the open-market rent if lower than the proposed rent or the proposed rent.  Any rent increase then takes effect after the FTT decision. However, the Secretary of State has the power to make regulations to change the effective date of the rent increase. This provision was added to the Act to allay fears of there being no downside to tenants challenging any rent increase in order to delay the date when payment of the increased rent would be due (even in cases where the landlord was successful in increasing the rent). The other important point which will be relevant to popular Build to Rent locations is that a tenant can challenge the rent within the first 6 months of the tenancy or conversion to an assured tenancy by implementation of the Bill. This could be used to bring down rents if they are not reflective of the local open market which means the Build to Rent provider will lose the advantage of the block being desirable and the rents reflecting that as it will be the open market rent in the locality which is determinative.

  3. Ban on bidding for rental properties;

    In a significant change to the way in which properties are let. Landlords are not permitted under the Act to invite, encourage or accept an offer exceeding the proposed advertised rent for a property. To prepare for this change, landlords and agents of build to rent properties will want to retain evidence of property adverts and offers of proposed rent which they receive for properties which can be produced in response to a local authority’s request to demonstrate compliance with these provisions, once they come into force.

  4. Right for a tenant to request consent for a pet; and

    The Act contains provisions enabling a tenant to request consent to keep a pet at the property. A landlord cannot unreasonably withhold their consent to the tenant’s request.  There is a process which must be followed, with 28 days for the landlord to respond either granting or refusing consent, from the date of the tenant’s request.  When the Bill was originally drafted it contained provision for a landlord to require a tenant to take out a pet insurance product against damage if the landlord granted consent to a pet. However, this was removed from the Bill and the idea of a pet damage deposit was also rejected. A landlord will only be able to seek the statutory maximum deposit (in most cases of 5 week’s rent) in the usual way which would need to cover both any damage caused by the tenant and by a pet (for which consent was granted). Build to rent operators will be cautious about being left with a shortfall where a request for a pet is made and granted and damage is caused which exceeds the amount of the tenant’s deposit which they hold.

  5. Landlords will need to have an active listing on a new private rented sector database

    Much of the detail surrounding the private rented sector database will be contained in secondary legislation. However, landlords will need an active listing to market or let properties and to obtain an order for possession. The secondary legislation will contain details of how entries are to be made, including the documents to be submitted, the requirements for an active listing on the database and any fees payable by the landlord.  This will be an additional administrative and financial burden for landlords and their agents. 

The big question is when will the Act be implemented. Those in the build to rent sector will be keeping eager eyes out for further announcements from the Government.

We are tracking developments on our Essential Residential Hub and our timeline: Evolution of the private rented sector. Please do not hesitate to contact Lauren Fraser, Laura Bushaway or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact if you have any queries.

Completing the Bill’s final stage today is obviously only the beginning; once the Bill becomes law, we need to implement its provisions. In doing so, we will balance the need to act quickly, so that tenants can soon benefit from the new rights and protections introduced by the Bill, with ensuring that the sector has sufficient time to adjust and prepare for a significant change in regulation. The Government understand the need for certainty, and we will set out our implementation plans as soon as possible.

Our thinking

  • What role can construction lawyers play in helping UK construction sector clients achieve greater success and how?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • What are the trends in the purpose built student accommodation market in the UK over the last 12 months and how will they change in the next 12 months

    Mark White

    Insights

  • Maile v Maile – Assurances and Detriment Under the Microscope in Family Farm Claims

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Renters’ Rights and Student Accommodation: What is the latest as the Act obtains Royal Assent?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • Essential Residential: What is the latest on Renters’ Rights and Leasehold Reform?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • Service Charge miniseries: The Future of Commercial and Residential Service Charges

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • Building Safety in Wales

    Anna Frost

    Insights

  • Service Charge miniseries: Variation of Residential Leases

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • Service Charge miniseries: Commercial Service Charges

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • Michael O'Connor and Richard Flenley write for Construction Law on lessons from two Building Safety Act (BSA) cases in the Court of Appeal

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Upper Tribunal considers its jurisdiction to modify or discharge an easement

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Samuel Lear

    Events

  • Q&A: Agreeing electronically

    Laura Bushaway

    Insights

  • The final stages of the Renters’ Rights Bill

    Bella Preece

    Quick Reads

  • Lauren Fraser and Laura Bushaway write for Estates Gazette on the Decent Homes Standard

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

  • Joe Edwards and Adam Smith-Roberts write for EG on a recent professional negligence decision in the Court of Appeal (Bratt v Jones)

    Joe Edwards

    In the Press

  • Investors' Chronicle quotes Hannah Catt and Lauren Fraser on what to consider when buying a flat

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

  • Renters Rights Bill: Key Information for Rural Landowners

    Alastair Morrison

    Insights

  • Joe Edwards and Adam Smith-Roberts write for the Law Society Gazette on an important professional negligence decision in the Court of Appeal

    Joe Edwards

    In the Press

Back to top