• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Breaking up is never easy – or is it? Why Gen Z are swiping right on divorce

min read

I have (somewhat terrifyingly) learnt that, in my late twenties, I am apparently a “senior most” member of Gen Z – which, according to a recent New York Times article, means I am “old enough to have gotten married, but also old enough to regret it”. As my generation enters its divorce era, it’s clear that the decision to end a marriage no longer has the same stigma attached to it as it did for Baby Boomers, Gen X and Millennials. Rather than being viewed as some sort of shameful, personal failure, Gen Z are choosing to view divorce as something which can empower you. The rising popularity of “divorce cakes” and “divorce rings” (refashioned engagement rings, as worn by Emily Ratajkowski) are emblematic of Gen Z’s tendency to celebrate the new chapter in life that divorce brings, rather than mourning the end of the relationship. As the NYT article notes, “in 2025, splits often feel less like scandals and more like rebrands.”

There is a strong sense for Gen Z that if a relationship isn’t serving you, rather than ‘sticking it out’ because you made a vow, you should leave. But how easy is it to actually just walk away from a marriage? 

Gen Z notoriously want everything now, and it’s no different when it comes to their divorces. Growing up with social media means this is a generation used to instant gratification – but, unfortunately, posting a picture of your new “divorce ring” online is quite different from actually getting legally divorced. In England and Wales, it takes at least 7 months to get divorced because there is a mandatory waiting period of 20 weeks between making the initial application and being able to progress to the next stage (called the Conditional Order) – after that, you still have to wait another 6 weeks and 1 day before you can finalise the divorce. In many cases, getting “divorced” takes significantly longer than this because the parties also need to sort out the financial arrangements (whether through negotiations or a Court process, the latter of which almost always extends the process even further). 

Nevertheless, hope remains for Gen Z and its desire to prioritise what the NYT article calls “fast, efficient divorces”. There are a number of reasons why a Gen Z divorce might be ‘easier’, both emotionally and financially, than for generations past: 

  • With “emotional well-being” being increasingly cited as the reason for the breakdown in a marriage – rather than infidelity, as is more commonly the case for older couples – both parties in a Gen Z relationship are more easily able to view the divorce as a transition in their relationship, for which neither of them are to blame. The introduction of “no fault” divorce in England and Wales in 2022 has no doubt also helped in reframing people’s views. A more amicable separation bodes well for parties being able to reach an agreement about their finances, rather than having protracted and acrimonious negotiations or Court proceedings. 
     
  • There will often be less assets (and/or less valuable assets) to be split and, consequently, it may be more straightforward for the parties to reach a composite agreement about their finances outside of a Court process. As the NYT article notes, whilst there may be more student debt and complex digital currencies to contend with, divorcing young also inevitably means there will be fewer matrimonial assets to divide. 
     
  • With an increasing number of Gen Z adults choosing to have pets instead of children, it’s likely that matters won’t be complicated by having to deal with the needs of minor children (which, in England and Wales, is always the paramount consideration for the Court) or indeed arrangements for contact with the children. If there are no children, it is also more likely that both parties will have continued working throughout the marriage and so it might be appropriate for there to be a ‘clean break’, without the need for one party to pay spousal maintenance to the other in order to help them adjust to financial independence (which is much more likely to happen after a long marriage of multiple decades, especially where one of the parties has given up work to be a stay-at-home parent).  

Just because divorce might be easier for Gen Z, that doesn’t mean they take it less seriously (which is often the assumption of older generations). The NYT article suggests that, even if Gen Z no longer feel ashamed of their divorces, they still understand that it’s a “huge, huge deal to go through”. It may just be that my generation feel more prepared to end a marriage because they don’t want to stick it out in a relationship which no longer makes them, or the other person, happy – and perhaps that’s no bad thing. 

Related reading

Gen Z Report

The senior-most members of Gen Z are in their late 20s: old enough to have gotten married, but also old enough to regret it.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Next Gen Drinks Reception

    Events

    min read
  • Welfare always prevails? The implications of A & B v C & D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam) for UK domestic and overseas surrogacy

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • Spear's features William Longrigg's views on potential reforms to the UK family court and the reintroduction of Calderbank offers

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • 5 things English companies and their investors need to know about human rights-related litigation risks

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • A founder's guide to SAFEs: fast-tracking investment for UK technology start-ups

    Grace Hudson

    Insights

    min read
  • Practicalities of Property Management Seminar

    Events

    min read
  • Darren Bailey sits on the judging panel for City AM's Football Power List

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill: Where are we now?

    Lauren Fraser

    Insights

    min read
  • “A Fairer End to Relationships”: First Thoughts on the Government's Landmark Consultation

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • Charles Hutton contributes to Investors' Chronicle exploring the role of trusts in families' financial planning

    Charles Hutton

    In the Press

    min read
  • Robert Lundie Smith writes for WIPR on how enforced arbitration could fix a 'dysfunctional' global FRAND system

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top