• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

RONALDO: A RELATIONSHIP OF TWO HALVES

As of August 2025 Cristiano Ronaldo, 40, the iconic Portuguese footballer, is engaged to Georgina Rodríguez, 31, a Spanish model and influencer. The couple reportedly met in 2016, when Georgina was working as a sales assistant at a Gucci store in Madrid.  Their relationship blossomed quickly, and they began living together shortly thereafter.  They have since become one of the most talked-about celebrity couples.

Ronaldo is currently playing for Al-Nassr in the Saudi Pro League, having made a high-profile move from Manchester United in 2023.  His presence in the league has brought significant attention to football in the region, showcasing his enduring influence on the sport.  Ronaldo's estimated net worth is around £400 million, accumulated through his illustrious football career, endorsements, and business ventures. Georgina Rodríguez has carved out her own successful career in modelling and social media influencing, with an estimated net worth of around £8 million. She has further expanded her public profile with her Netflix show, "I Am Georgina", which offers viewers an intimate look into her life, career, and her relationship with Ronaldo.

Nearly ten years after meeting, Ronaldo and Rodríguez have decided to marry.  The wedding will no doubt be lavish and they will come out for the second half of their relationship legally-married.

Aside from THAT ring, there is much comment in the press (at least from family practitioners) about the importance of nuptial agreements, within which the couple could agree arrangements for the division of finances in the event of a future divorce.  The obvious benefit of doing so would be to provide clarity about their respective financial claims in those unfortunate circumstances.

Typically, nuptial agreements provide for a couple to retain assets they respectively acquired prior to the marriage, subject to provision for needs or other specified financial support.  There is one particular implication of their marriage, which is perhaps less obvious, but which is financially significant.

They are an international couple with connections to various countries, including England.  It is not inconceivable that on a future separation they could be subject to English law if, after marrying, they settled in England.  Without a pre- or postnuptial agreement, the starting point under English law would be for the assets acquired during the marriage to be divided equally.  However, case law provides that a period of ‘seamless’ cohabitation prior to a marriage should not be differentiated from the marriage itself for the purposes of the ‘sharing principle’ when considering a division of the assets.  This is of particular significance, bearing in mind that much of the wealth generated by both Cristiano (via his lucrative earnings in Saudi) and Georgina (as her profile has increased) will likely have been accrued before the marriage, but during their cohabitation.  In this respect, as with many other couples who have been cohabiting for an extended period before tying the knot, it would be prudent to consider whether alternative arrangements for assets of this nature should be specified in a nuptial agreement to avoid an outcome in the future that might be contrary to the couple’s intentions at that time that they entered into a marriage.

Aside from THAT ring, there is much comment in the press (at least from family practitioners) about the importance of nuptial agreements, within which the couple could agree arrangements for the division of finances in the event of a future divorce...

Our thinking

  • Stéphane de Lassus quoted in Décideurs Patrimoine on the importance of structured family dialogue for succession planning

    Stéphane de Lassus

    In the Press

  • Solicitor's "SLAPP" ruling overturned

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

  • Avoid Airport Anxiety: Check your passport can be used for travel to the UK – Rules change significantly on 25 February 2026, especially dual-nationals

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Hilde Braaten Resseth writes for Family Law Journal comparing parental responsibility laws in Norway, England and Wales

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    In the Press

  • Family Law Journal features Jamie Kennaugh, Hanh Nguyen, Francesca Heath-Clarke, Charlotte Posnansky, and Daniel Staunton on the interplay between family and insolvency law

    Hanh Nguyen

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient profiles Suzanne Marriott, Head of Art & Luxury

    Suzanne Marriott

    In the Press

  • Tom Smitham writes for City AM on the growing investor appetite for sports assets

    Tom Smitham

    In the Press

  • The future is looking bright for Hong Kong-ers under the BN(O) route

    Owen Chan

    Quick Reads

  • Beyond the Feed: Protecting Children’s Mental Health in Family Proceedings

    Jessica Dawkins

    Quick Reads

  • When the Jellicle Ball Ends: Navigating Pet Ownership on Divorce

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural tenancies: back to basics

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • eprivateclient quotes Oliver Little on how tax clarity can help the UK regain confidence among global wealth holders

    Oliver Little

    In the Press

  • Mary Perham and Tristan Tydings write for IFA Magazine on business property relief changes

    Mary Perham

    In the Press

  • Lump sum tax regime: higher annual flat tax and grandfathering provision

    Nicola Saccardo

    Quick Reads

  • 2025: Year in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies Explained: How Control Shapes Succession Planning

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Maria Cristiana Felisi writes for WeWealth on international couples and Italian matrimonial property regimes

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

  • Hubbis features Jeffrey Lee on the rise of the multi‑hub family office landscape

    Jeffrey Lee

    In the Press

  • QICCA Conciliation Rules 2026 - scope, confidentiality and process at a glance

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • The UK Supreme Court to consider whether adoption orders can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Quick Reads

Back to top