• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The interrelation of family wealth and family offices

min read

The landscape concerning family wealth is evolving and there is projected to be a corresponding ‘rapid expansion’ of family offices in the coming years with a 75% increase in family offices expected by 2030. The estimated wealth of families with family offices currently stands at US$5.5 trillion and is expected to grow to US$9.5 trillion by 2030 – a 189% increase. The Deloitte Private report of September 2024 provides insights into the future of family offices and the evolving landscape and is referenced throughout this article. 

With many wealthy families now choosing to manage their wealth and investments through private offices, wealth structuring and an almost ‘commercial filter’ to personal wealth - this will likely have an impact on the management of wealth in the event of a marriage breakdown, as well as when considering and planning for upcoming nuptials.

We highlight some key points below concerning the interrelation of family offices and family wealth.

Nuptial agreements

Pre and post nuptial agreements are becoming increasingly commonplace and particularly since 2010 when the Supreme Court gave guidance in the case of Radmacher v Granatino that the court should give effect to nuptial agreements which are fair and are freely entered into, they are now accepted and considered as a useful wealth management tool. Generally speaking, it is more common for pre-nuptial agreements to be entered into – a practical discussion regarding finances before entering into marriage, although post nuptial agreements can be equally beneficial.

Some families with significant wealth will insist (or strongly encourage) younger generations to enter into nuptial agreements. Additionally, following the Supreme Court decision in Standish in July 2025 concerning the sharing of matrimonial property, it is considered by many family lawyers that nuptial agreements will continue to have growing importance as clear principles were set out showing how the court will consider matrimonial property (which should be shared between the spouses). Therefore, having a clear agreement as to what is ‘separate’ or non-matrimonial property and will be beneficial to the spouse seeking to protect any family assets.  

As mentioned above, nuptial agreements are particularly important for the more wealthy spouse wishing to protect their assets and those who are bringing significant wealth into the marriage -this could be entrepreneurs who have built up or sold businesses or those who have family wealth (and those with family offices). Whilst the family office, and wealth structuring, adds a layer of complexity and a somewhat commercial filter, all resources and any financial assets from which either party might benefit need to be disclosed during financial proceedings on a divorce. 

The structure of the family office

Given the projected figures and expansion in number of family offices, it will be interesting to see what impact this might have on financial proceedings upon a divorce (even in negotiated settlements). There may be an added level of advisors and management of family (personal) wealth which could add in delay to matters, or, conversely, having the structure of an office can streamline and help in providing clear and concise disclosure. In the recent case of Helliwell v Entwistle, the Court of Appeal overturned a decision to uphold a prenuptial agreement on grounds of deliberate non-disclosure.  Family offices can be invaluable in ensuring financial disclosure requirements are met in financial proceedings on divorce and/or when a prenuptial agreement is entered into.

The fact that wealth is managed via an office and potentially held through various structures, rather than by the individuals involved directly, would also need to be addressed and explained during the disclosure process. If spouses have enjoyed family wealth throughout the marriage, but it is essentially held by the generation preceding (be it the parents of a spouse or the wider family) that too would need to be explained – is it a resource, reflective of a particular lifestyle or an indication of an imminent transfer of wealth? 

There may also be issues concerning privacy and it is likely that family offices will be keen to keep private matters outside of the court arena.

Conclusion

The Deloitte report outlines that: “Family offices’ surge in popularity is driven by a combination of factors, including increased wealth concentration, successful transfers of generational wealth, robust private equity and Mergers & Acquisitions markets, and the pursuit of more customised investment strategies and services”. 

It is these transfers of generational wealth that could be relevant upon a divorce – how should an expected future inheritance or an interest that is managed via a family office be treated (and should or could it be shared particularly in the absence of any nuptial agreement) or how can it be protected?

The report outlines that “in looking ahead, many family offices are staying true to the traditions of past and current generations, while also evolving to meet the needs of future generations,” and the landscape is expected to change rapidly over the next decade.
 

“Family offices’ surge in popularity is driven by a combination of factors, including increased wealth concentration, successful transfers of generational wealth, robust private equity and Mergers & Acquisitions markets, and the pursuit of more customised investment strategies and services”.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • From Pilot to Nationwide Protection: New Powers to Protect Victims of Domestic Abuse

    Hilde Braaten Resseth

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi writes in We Wealth about the treatment of joint bank accounts on inheritance

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys celebrates US team recognition in Best Lawyers in America® 2027

    Karen Yates

    News

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Diversification, safe havens and the pivot to Asia for US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Bloomberg quotes Gaven Cheong on proposed Hong Kong tax exemptions on carried interest

    Gaven Cheong

    In the Press

    min read
  • Pay Up or We'll Tell All: The High Court's Firm Stance on Blackmail in Privacy Cases

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Family Offices want crypto – but who's helping them get there?

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Succession, governance and the next generation in US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Wei Kang comments on China’s new tax rule on offshore trusts in The Straits Times

    In the Press

    min read
  • A New Era of Wealth and Estate Planning for PRC High-Net-Worth Families

    Wei Kang

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top