• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The Dubai Court of Cassation provides clarity on the recovery of legal fees in a recent judgment

min read

The Dubai Court of Cassation has recently issued a notable judgment (No. 503/2025) that appears, at first glance, to depart from the established approach of the UAE onshore courts towards the recovery of legal fees. Traditionally, successful litigants before the UAE local courts are awarded only modest, fixed amounts for legal representation often in the range of AED 1,000 to AED 2,000 per stage regardless of the actual costs incurred. In this case, however, the Court of Cassation signaled a willingness to award the full amount of proven legal fees, which in this instance totaled approximately AED 150,000.

The dispute arose from a commercial loan agreement under which the borrower defaulted on repayment. The lender commenced proceedings before the UAE courts, seeking recovery of the outstanding principal, contractual interest, and legal costs, relying on a contractual clause requiring the borrower to bear all legal fees in the event of default.

The Court of First Instance and Court of Appeal found in favour of the lender on the debt principal owed and interest but awarded only a nominal sum for legal fees. The lender appealed, arguing that the contractual provision entitled it to full reimbursement. The Court of Appeal rejected this, holding that the fees agreed between a party and its own lawyer do not bind the opposing party (i.e., the borrower in this case).

On further appeal, the Court of Cassation disagreed. It upheld the validity of the contractual clause in the loan agreement which entitled the lender to recover legal fees from the borrower in the event of default, provided such fees were proven and attributable to the proceedings. It held that where a party seeks recovery of legal fees, it must present clear and persuasive evidence of the actual costs incurred and demonstrate that these were directly related to the proceedings. In the absence of such proof, the court will continue its practice of awarding modest, fixed sums. However, where the evidence is compelling, the UAE courts may grant full recovery.

The Court of Cassation remitted the case to the Court of Appeal (as the court of substance) for reconsideration before a different bench. The expectation is that the Court of Appeal will follow the Court of Cassation’s ruling and award the lender’s legal fees in full — unless it finds grounds, based on overlooked material facts, to maintain its earlier stance.

This judgment reaffirms that full recovery of legal fees in UAE onshore litigation remains the exception rather than the rule. Parties wishing to maximise their prospects should:

  • Include express contractual provisions on recovery of legal fees; and
  • Maintain comprehensive documentary evidence — including invoices and proof of payment — linking the fees directly to the dispute.

We will continue to monitor this matter and provide updates on further developments

Our thinking

  • Virtual Currency Regulation: United Arab Emirates

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

    min read
  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • France Modernises Its Arbitration Law: What Does Decree No. 2026-741 Change?

    Simon Le Wita

    Insights

    min read
  • Disclosing Settlement Agreements in Due Diligence: Navigating Confidentiality and Risk

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

    min read
  • Cryptocurrency crime in Switzerland

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

    min read
  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to just and equitable winding up

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust Orders: A Practical Guide to Obtaining Information and Tracing Assets

    Martha Lazanakis

    Insights

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write in the Law Society Gazette about the new corporate liability for criminal offences committed by senior managers

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Caveat Venditor?: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Sale and Purchase Agreements

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Restraint and Confiscation Orders in England and Wales

    Jana Billington

    Insights

    min read
  • Henry Winter and Jeffrey Lee write in Hubbis about arbitration and cross-border family wealth in Asia

    Henry Winter

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens Middle East Corporate practice with appointment of Philip O’Riordan

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Qatar’s New Preliminary Registration Framework: A Transformative Step for the Off-Plan Market

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Fowl Play: Lessons from Lux Films Ltd v Fowler & Anor [2026] EWHC 963 (KB)

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Genuine Belief Is Not Enough: Supreme Court Confirms Section 172 Demands Good Faith in Conduct, Not Just Thought

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
Back to top