• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Understanding Freezing Orders in Switzerland: Key Requirements and Procedures

In Switzerland, freezing orders serve as a precautionary measure to secure a debtor's assets, ensuring that creditors can safeguard their claims. This article outlines the essential requirements for obtaining a freezing order, the procedure involved, and the enforcement process.

Requirements for Granting a Freezing Order

A court will grant a freezing order if the creditor can credibly demonstrate the following:

  • Existing Claim Against the Debtor

The applicant must prove the existence of a monetary claim against the debtor, showing a likelihood of being a creditor. This can stem from an existing judgment or circumstances like an acknowledgment of debt or contractual obligation. The claim must be immediately established and mature, although exceptions apply if the claim is particularly endangered, such as when the debtor lacks a permanent residence or is at risk of absconding. Claims already secured by a lien are ineligible for a freezing order.

  • Assets of the Debtor Located in Switzerland

The creditor must provide prima facie evidence of assets owned by the debtor, specifying the assets to be frozen and their location. Only assets belonging to the debtor can be secured, and they must be attachable with monetary value, such as physical objects, intellectual property rights, or bank account balances. Exceptionally, assets formally belonging to another legal entity may be frozen if credible evidence of economic unity exists. Assets must be located in Switzerland, with their location determined by physical presence or land register entry for real estate, or the domicile of the creditor or third-party debtor for non-embodied claims.

  • Grounds for Freezing Order

The creditor's claim must be at risk due to the debtor's behavior or external circumstances. Grounds for a freezing order include:

  • No Permanent Residence: The debtor lacks a fixed domicile, posing enforcement challenges.
  • Intent to Evade Obligations: The debtor stashes assets or absconds to evade obligations.
  • In Transit or Attending Markets: Targeting traveling merchants, this applies to claims due on receipt.
  • Foreign Domicile with Swiss Connection: The debtor is abroad, but the claim has a sufficient relation to Switzerland or is based on an enforceable judgment.
  • Certificate of Shortfall: The creditor holds a certificate of loss from unsuccessful debt collection.
  • Enforceable Title: The creditor has an enforceable judgment, arbitral award, or public deed.

Procedure: How to File a Freezing Order

Jurisdiction

The petition for a freezing order is filed with the court at the place where the debt collection proceedings take place (generally the debtor's residence) or where the assets are located. Cantonal law governs the competent court, typically a single judge at first instance. Multiple requests can be bundled at the forum for the debt collection proceedings and assets can be seized throughout Switzerland.

Summary Proceedings

Due to urgency, the procedure is unilateral, with the debtor not notified until after the decision. The court issues the order based on a summary examination of the creditor's submissions, focusing on their plausibility. Only immediately available evidence is admissible.

Advance on Costs

Court fees depend on the amount in dispute, ranging from CHF 70 to CHF 4,000, and are advanced by the applicant. The court may also require advance costs for potential objection proceedings initiated by the debtor.

Enforcement of the Freezing Order

The debt enforcement office executes the freezing order, securing specified assets without prior notification to the debtor. The order has a security function and provisional character, subject to the prohibition of excessive distraint. Certain assets may be exempt or limited in seizure even if they are listed in the freezing order.

Objection, Appeal, and Damages

Affected parties can lodge an objection within ten days of receiving the executed order, allowing for a subsequent hearing. The court decides promptly, and the decision can be appealed. Objections may challenge jurisdiction, competence, grounds, or claim validity. If the freezing order is unjustified, the creditor is liable for resulting damages, with the judge potentially requiring security from the creditor.

Freezing orders are a vital tool for creditors in Switzerland, providing a mechanism to secure assets and protect claims amidst potential risks. Understanding the requirements and procedures ensures effective use of this legal remedy.

Get in Touch

Please get in touch with our Swiss Litigation team in case you have any queries about freezing orders in Switzerland.

Swiss Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act (not available in English)

Our thinking

  • Navigating Force Majeure, Impossibility and Frustration under UAE Law During the Current Crisis

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Strengthens Swiss Tax Capabilities with Appointment of Frédéric Ney in Geneva

    Frédéric Ney

    News

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for IFA Magazine on risks arising from the intersection of family wealth and commercial lending

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • The Brocklesby Principle Bites: Occupation Alone Won't Defeat a Lender's Charge

    Lauren Leney

    Quick Reads

  • Swiss Federal Supreme Court Rules: No Transfer of Holiday Home to Trust Without Authorisation

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Quick Reads

  • Big Changes to Packaging Waste Rules in UK and EU Supply Chains

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

  • Henry Winter and Abdul Azeem Abdul Samad write for DCNN Magazine on arbitrating data centre disputes in Southeast Asia

    Henry Winter

    In the Press

  • Freezing orders: how are they enforced around the world? United Arab Emirates (ADGM and DIFC) perspective

    Peter Smith

    Insights

  • SFI26: What Agricultural Practitioners Need to Know

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • The collapse of Carillion plc and the final FCA fine issued

    Claudine Morgan

    Quick Reads

  • Family Law lookahead – 2026

    Jemimah Fleet

    Insights

  • Farmers Weekly and FarmingUK quote Maddie Dunn on the latest UK farm rent data and associated industry trends

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • AI in arbitration: rules, tools, and risks

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

  • Half Term, Full Cottages: Diversification in Real Time

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Solicitor's "SLAPP" ruling overturned

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

  • Avoid Airport Anxiety: Check your passport can be used for travel to the UK – Rules change significantly on 25 February 2026, especially dual-nationals

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Breaking Board Deadlocks: High Court Webster ruling expands shareholder remedies against uncooperative boards

    Jana Billington

    Insights

  • FT Adviser features Abigail Rushton and Richard Burger on the SFO's refreshed compliance guidance

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

Back to top