• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The Two Most Feared Foreign Tax Provisions in the One Big, Beautiful Bill: Now Eliminated or Defanged

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act or the OBBBA is a major piece of US tax reform legislation. The OBBBA aimed to overhaul several aspects of the Internal Revenue Code, with a focus on extending the expiring tax provisions enacted by Trump under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017. 

The OBBBA originated in the House of Representatives with two proposed provisions nicknamed the “Revenge Tax” under Proposed Section 899 and the “Remittance Transfer Excise Tax” under Proposed Section 4475.  

The Revenge Tax introduced a new US surtax aimed at companies and investors from countries that impose taxes deemed unfair to American businesses. From the time this bill was proposed until the G7 meeting, it was the most-discussed topic in the tax community. We've never witnessed such a surge of LinkedIn posts focused on this particular section. 

The Remittance Transfer Excise Tax created a transaction-based excise tax imposed on outbound money transfers from the US. Anyone who transfers money from the US to another country must pay the excise tax, initially set at 5%, regardless of their legal status in the US. This applies to foreign workers on an H-1B visa, tourists making international transfers, and green card holders. 

On June 16, 2025, the Senate Finance Committee unveiled draft text containing tax provisions that amend the House's version of the OBBBA.  

Subsequently, on July 1, 2025, the Senate introduced further amendments to the OBBBA, creating the version that will be presented to Trump for his signature on July 4 (Independence Day). We are betting that Trump will opt for a dramatic backdrop, complete with fireworks, when he signs the OBBBA. 

Under the soon-to-be-signed version of the OBBBA, the Revenge Tax has been completely eliminated, and the Remittance Transfer Excise Tax has been defanged. The excise tax rate has been lowered to 1% (from the initial 5%) and now only applies to remittance transfers where the sender uses cash, a money order, a cashier's check, or any other similar physical instrument to make the transfer. 

Based on this progress and understanding, I have asked the Senate and House to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill. This understanding with our G7 partners provides greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond. I thank Senator Crapo and Chairman Smith for their leadership that made this day possible.

Our thinking

  • When the Jellicle Ball Ends: Navigating Pet Ownership on Divorce

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural tenancies: back to basics

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • eprivateclient quotes Oliver Little on how tax clarity can help the UK regain confidence among global wealth holders

    Oliver Little

    In the Press

  • Mary Perham and Tristan Tydings write for IFA Magazine on business property relief changes

    Mary Perham

    In the Press

  • Hotel Management Agreements: avoiding common causes of dispute

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Lump sum tax regime: higher annual flat tax and grandfathering provision

    Nicola Saccardo

    Quick Reads

  • 2025: Year in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies Explained: How Control Shapes Succession Planning

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Hubbis features Jeffrey Lee on the rise of the multi‑hub family office landscape

    Jeffrey Lee

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Extension of Schedule A1 Inheritance Tax “look‑through” to UK agricultural property

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Miranda Fisher on the rise in arbitration for divorces in England and Wales

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Erell Bauduin comments in VOGUE Business on how leading companies approach succession strategy

    Erell Bauduin

    In the Press

  • Succession Planning in Family Investment Companies: What Should Families Consider?

    Mary Perham

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies: family values, succession and wealth stewardship

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Through the looking glass - transparency in the family courts (reprised).

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Marcus Yorke-Long comments in Spears on the mediation of family wealth disputes

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • CGT and Excluded Settlors: Reimbursement Risks for Trustees Post April 2025

    Alice Martin

    Insights

  • H2 2025 – Corporate Deal Highlights

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

  • Ahmad Anani and Jihane Rizk write for The Legal Industry Reviews: Qatar Edition on private wealth structures under the QFC regime.

    Ahmad Anani

    In the Press

  • Peter Smith writes for TL4 Middle East Magazine on the rise of arbitration in private wealth disputes

    Peter Smith

    In the Press

Back to top