• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Dubai chocolate craze and related allergen concerns in the workplace

min read

TikTok and Instagram influencers have contributed to so-called Dubai chocolate going ‘viral’ in the UK. However, the UK food watchdog, the Food Standards Agency, has issued warnings to people, in particular those with allergies, not to buy imported Dubai chocolate if they have any doubts about ingredients because of different labelling standards.  A recent BBC investigation has also found that several TikTok Shops have been selling food products without listing allergen information.

The UK operates high levels of food safety standards and requirements, much of which continues to derive from EU law. There are requirements under law with respect to the overall safety of food products and in relation to labelling; fundamentally creating requirements intent on allowing consumers to make fully informed decisions on the products they purchase.  Packaged products have extensive information requirements including providing the name of the product, manufacturer, place of origin, use by date and ingredients - with a requirement to clearly and fully identify the presence of specific allergens in the product.  The consequences of non-compliance are potentially and understandably severe extending to fines and prison sentences for operators for the more serious of failings.

Workplace safety concerns

The Dubai chocolate viral craze creates complexities for employers.  An employer has the responsibilities and liabilities of a food operator where it provides food products to its employees.  In the context of corporate hospitality for clients, customers and contacts, providing gifts for free does excuse or provide a defence to the need to meet food safety and labelling laws. 

In the workplace, many employers already institute a no-nut policy and undertake risk assessments to account for allergen sensitivities in the workplace.  This is in order to consider duties and requirements under Health and Safety legislation.  Employers will need to consider their own risk assessments and the level of risk around the influx of this product, if at all.  A significant complication with a product such as Dubai chocolate is that the ingredients typically contain both pistachio and tahini, both of which feature within the 14 prescribed allergies under UK allergen law under nuts and sesame.  This may be in addition to any other ingredients that may be present in the product. If an employer operates a nut ban in the workplace, Dubai chocolate would be captured under this prohibition.

“Providing gifts for free does not excuse or provide a defence against the need to comply with food safety and labelling laws.”

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top