• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Planning essentials case update: what changes can I make to my listed building?

A recent decision[1] by the Planning Inspectorate is a stark reminder to listed building owners of the costly ramifications of ignoring planning rules for listed buildings. In 2010, the owner of a Grade II listed three-storey terraced house built in Westminster in 1729 had an application for listed building consent for a sub-basement refused by the Council, and then rejected at appeal. The owner nevertheless went ahead with unauthorised changes – including a new basement level complete with a cinema, gymnasium and sauna. 

Westminster City Council subsequently served an enforcement notice on the owner which was then upheld by a Planning Inspector at appeal last month. The homeowner must now completely and permanently infill the unauthorised basement, remove unauthorised alterations and pay the Council’s costs.  The Inspector acknowledged that the restoration works would likely mean that the homeowner would need to vacate the property for some time and obtain separate authorisations for the infilling – so a very costly and time-consuming endeavour awaits.   

The Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas Act 1990 sets out that you need listed building consent for any works of demolition of a listed building or for the alteration or extension or a listed building in any manner that would affect its character as a building of special architectural or historic interest.

This means that not all works to a listed building will require listed building consent. If your property is listed and you want to carry out any internal or external works, you must (i) identify the building’s special architectural or historic interest and then (ii) consider whether the proposed works will impact that special interest. If so, listed building consent is required.  

A good starting place for a homeowner is to consider how Historic England describes the property by viewing the Historic England List (see here) and by reviewing Historic England’s guidance notes (see here) setting out what types of work may or may not require listed building consent. However, homeowners should note that the List is not always up to date and that listings are not definitive as to what constitutes special character.

Carrying out unauthorised works to a listed building is a criminal offence. A homeowner could be liable to an unlimited fine or even a term of imprisonment of up to two years. On top of a criminal conviction, the local planning authority – as seen in the recent appeal – can require you to reverse all the changes and restore the listed building to its original state. This can be an expensive exercise. 

A local planning authority can take enforcement action against unauthorised changes to a listed building at any time – there is no limitation period. Therefore, homeowners should take extra care when making any alterations, whether internal or external, to a listed building. It’s also worth remembering that planning permission may be required on top of listed building consent.

If you are planning to sell your listed property and you have made changes without obtaining the necessary listed building consent, your buyer may want the position regularised before they purchase (so that they do not find themselves in a situation where they are required to reinstate the works). This could delay or frustrate the sale.  

Therefore, before undertaking any work to a listed building homeowners should engage proactively with officers at their local planning authority as to what may be acceptable, and consider instructing a heritage consultant or such other expert for specialist input. 

 

[1] Appeal Ref: APP/X5990/F/23/3319608

it is an alteration to the listed building affecting its character and hence listed building consent is required

Our thinking

  • Hannah Catt writes for Tax Adviser on the implications of the newly introduced high value council tax surcharge in the UK

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

  • UK Living Sector 2026: Regulatory pressures, new trading platforms and more accessible public markets

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

  • The Standard quotes William Marriott on the impact of the newly introduced 'mansion tax' in the UK

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Amenity Space in UK Office Buildings: Why It Matters and What Tenants Need to Consider

    Lynsey Inglis

    Insights

  • UK Hotels Sector 2026: Renovations, AI and Experience‑Led Stays

    James Broadhurst

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows Real Estate team with the appointment of UK and Italian market expert Chiara Del Frate

    Robin Grove MIoL

    News

  • Property Wire quotes Josh Risso-Gill on the 'deep resourcing challenges' faced by many local planning authorities amidst significant delays

    Josh Risso-Gill

    In the Press

  • Can a late Payment Notice be treated as a Pay Less Notice: Vision Construct v Gypcraft?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • David Lloyd Leisure Completes Sale and Leaseback of New Herne Bay Club with Support from Charles Russell Speechlys

    Mark White

    News

  • What Changes in Switzerland on 1 Jan 2026: Debt Registers, Defects, Credit, and Remote Testimony

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

  • Saudi Arabia’s 2025 Law on Expropriation of Real Estate for Public Interest and Temporary Taking of Property: Key Takeaways on the New Legal Framework

    Etidal Alwazani

    Insights

  • Bella Preece awarded first prize in the Property Litigation Association's Alan Langleben Memorial Blog Competition 2025

    Bella Preece

    News

  • Georgina Muskett writes for Property Week on the conundrum of green leasing

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Top 5 Changes under the new Renters’ Rights Act 2025

    Lauren Fraser

    Podcasts

  • Ministry of Sound Limited v. The British Foreign Wharf Company Limited (and ors): Balancing terms of a renewal lease with redevelopment potential

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • UAE CCL Reforms: Introducing Multi-Class Shares, Drag / Tag Rights, Deadlock Solutions and Governance Continuity

    Mo Nawash

    Quick Reads

  • Property Week quotes Andrew Ross on the case of Romal Capital v Peel Holdings

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

  • Building Safety Lookahead: 2026 will see the reform of the BSR, introduction of the Building Safety Levy and more

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • Collateral warranties: Liability and equivalent rights and defences clauses

    Jane Burrows

    Insights

  • UK Autumn Budget: Five minute guide for residential property owners

    Simon Green

    Quick Reads

Back to top