• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Planning essentials case update: what changes can I make to my listed building?

min read

A recent decision[1] by the Planning Inspectorate is a stark reminder to listed building owners of the costly ramifications of ignoring planning rules for listed buildings. In 2010, the owner of a Grade II listed three-storey terraced house built in Westminster in 1729 had an application for listed building consent for a sub-basement refused by the Council, and then rejected at appeal. The owner nevertheless went ahead with unauthorised changes – including a new basement level complete with a cinema, gymnasium and sauna. 

Westminster City Council subsequently served an enforcement notice on the owner which was then upheld by a Planning Inspector at appeal last month. The homeowner must now completely and permanently infill the unauthorised basement, remove unauthorised alterations and pay the Council’s costs.  The Inspector acknowledged that the restoration works would likely mean that the homeowner would need to vacate the property for some time and obtain separate authorisations for the infilling – so a very costly and time-consuming endeavour awaits.   

The Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas Act 1990 sets out that you need listed building consent for any works of demolition of a listed building or for the alteration or extension or a listed building in any manner that would affect its character as a building of special architectural or historic interest.

This means that not all works to a listed building will require listed building consent. If your property is listed and you want to carry out any internal or external works, you must (i) identify the building’s special architectural or historic interest and then (ii) consider whether the proposed works will impact that special interest. If so, listed building consent is required.  

A good starting place for a homeowner is to consider how Historic England describes the property by viewing the Historic England List (see here) and by reviewing Historic England’s guidance notes (see here) setting out what types of work may or may not require listed building consent. However, homeowners should note that the List is not always up to date and that listings are not definitive as to what constitutes special character.

Carrying out unauthorised works to a listed building is a criminal offence. A homeowner could be liable to an unlimited fine or even a term of imprisonment of up to two years. On top of a criminal conviction, the local planning authority – as seen in the recent appeal – can require you to reverse all the changes and restore the listed building to its original state. This can be an expensive exercise. 

A local planning authority can take enforcement action against unauthorised changes to a listed building at any time – there is no limitation period. Therefore, homeowners should take extra care when making any alterations, whether internal or external, to a listed building. It’s also worth remembering that planning permission may be required on top of listed building consent.

If you are planning to sell your listed property and you have made changes without obtaining the necessary listed building consent, your buyer may want the position regularised before they purchase (so that they do not find themselves in a situation where they are required to reinstate the works). This could delay or frustrate the sale.  

Therefore, before undertaking any work to a listed building homeowners should engage proactively with officers at their local planning authority as to what may be acceptable, and consider instructing a heritage consultant or such other expert for specialist input. 

 

[1] Appeal Ref: APP/X5990/F/23/3319608

it is an alteration to the listed building affecting its character and hence listed building consent is required

Our thinking

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • Qatar’s New Preliminary Registration Framework: A Transformative Step for the Off-Plan Market

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

    min read
  • Infrastructure Projects - Take care when accessing land under statutory powers

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Rebecca Morjaria and Steven Carey write in Building about liability for defective construction products

    Rebecca Morjaria

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitrating Construction Disputes – Comparing the ICC, LCIA, SIAC and SCCA Rules

    Christopher O'Brien

    Insights

    min read
  • Phillip Colasanto authors article in Tax Notes Federal on strengthening procedural protections for third parties in IRS collections

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys has advised long-standing client Derwent London on its building contract with Multiplex for the development of 50 Baker Street

    Fiona Edmond

    News

    min read
  • Building quotes Francis Ho on the implications of Building Liability Orders for contractors

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • No Trivial Matter: What Todd v Marsh Tells Us About Informal Boundary Agreements

    Bella Preece

    Insights

    min read
Back to top