• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Available in other languages:

Landmark rulings from the Italian Revenue Agency on income tax exemption on gains from Italian shares held in trust

min read

On 28 May 2025, the Italian Revenue Agency issued Tax Rulings No. 144 and No. 145 that the Firm obtained for one of its clients. 

Both rulings concern a trust governed by English law (“Trust”) settled by an individual resident in Italy for the benefit of his wife and descendants. 

Tax Ruling No. 145 rules that the Trust shall be characterised as an autonomous taxable person not disregarded vis-à-vis the settlor. The Italian Revenue acknowledged that, in light of both the Trust Deed and the features of the trustee (a Maltese company providing trust services under a licence issued by the Malta Financial Services Authority), the trustee had full discretionary powers in the management of the Trust assets without the settlor being in a position to interfere in such management. 

Tax Ruling No. 144 is even more interesting as it is the first time that the Revenue Agency rules on the specific subject.

Through the ruling application, it was represented that the settlor intended to settle into the Trust his “non-substantial” shareholding in a company resident in Italy; after the settlement, the Trust might realize a capital gain from the sale of such shareholding (it should be recalled that usually the settlement of a shareholding into a trust does not trigger a taxable event over the latent gain and the tax basis upon the settlor is rolled over to the trustee). The question posed to the tax authorities was whether such capital gain could benefit from the exemption regime provided by Article 5(5) of Legislative Decree No. 461 of 1997. 

The Italian Revenue, after having pointed out that the exemption regime applies to capital gains deriving from the sale of “non-substantial” shareholdings realized by persons who qualify as resident for income tax purposes in a jurisdiction listed in a Government’s white-list of jurisdictions which exchange information with Italy, confirmed the possibility for the Trust to benefit from the exemption. Upon the settlement of the Trust, the trustee made an option under Maltese tax law for the Trust to be subject to Maltese corporation tax as if it were a company resident in Malta which is a country included in the white-list. Hence, the Trust had to be considered as a person resident in Malta for income tax purposes, regardless of the fact that the capital gain could benefit from the Maltese participation exemption regime envisaged for the transfer of corporate shareholdings.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Next Gen Drinks Reception

    Events

    min read
  • General boundaries rule succeeds in boundary dispute between neighbours

    Emma Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 5: Healthcare, banking and housing

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Ulisses on €1 million seed round fundraising

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    News

    min read
  • How do the King’s Speech Bills Answer the New Energy Reality?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • ‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys’ Research & Information Services Team wins BIALL Lexis Nexis Award for Excellence 2026

    Jas Breslin

    News

    min read
  • ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’…But It Might Lose You Money: Conduct in the No-Fault Divorce Era

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Darren Bailey comments in City AM about mandatory release clauses and the future of football transfers

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • US – UK Energy Collaboration

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the shareholders of Pooky Lighting on its acquisition by leading US lighting company Visual Comfort & Co.

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • Welfare always prevails? The implications of A & B v C & D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam) for UK domestic and overseas surrogacy

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • Spear's features William Longrigg's views on potential reforms to the UK family court and the reintroduction of Calderbank offers

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
Back to top