• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Available in other languages:

Landmark rulings from the Italian Revenue Agency on income tax exemption on gains from Italian shares held in trust

min read

On 28 May 2025, the Italian Revenue Agency issued Tax Rulings No. 144 and No. 145 that the Firm obtained for one of its clients. 

Both rulings concern a trust governed by English law (“Trust”) settled by an individual resident in Italy for the benefit of his wife and descendants. 

Tax Ruling No. 145 rules that the Trust shall be characterised as an autonomous taxable person not disregarded vis-à-vis the settlor. The Italian Revenue acknowledged that, in light of both the Trust Deed and the features of the trustee (a Maltese company providing trust services under a licence issued by the Malta Financial Services Authority), the trustee had full discretionary powers in the management of the Trust assets without the settlor being in a position to interfere in such management. 

Tax Ruling No. 144 is even more interesting as it is the first time that the Revenue Agency rules on the specific subject.

Through the ruling application, it was represented that the settlor intended to settle into the Trust his “non-substantial” shareholding in a company resident in Italy; after the settlement, the Trust might realize a capital gain from the sale of such shareholding (it should be recalled that usually the settlement of a shareholding into a trust does not trigger a taxable event over the latent gain and the tax basis upon the settlor is rolled over to the trustee). The question posed to the tax authorities was whether such capital gain could benefit from the exemption regime provided by Article 5(5) of Legislative Decree No. 461 of 1997. 

The Italian Revenue, after having pointed out that the exemption regime applies to capital gains deriving from the sale of “non-substantial” shareholdings realized by persons who qualify as resident for income tax purposes in a jurisdiction listed in a Government’s white-list of jurisdictions which exchange information with Italy, confirmed the possibility for the Trust to benefit from the exemption. Upon the settlement of the Trust, the trustee made an option under Maltese tax law for the Trust to be subject to Maltese corporation tax as if it were a company resident in Malta which is a country included in the white-list. Hence, the Trust had to be considered as a person resident in Malta for income tax purposes, regardless of the fact that the capital gain could benefit from the Maltese participation exemption regime envisaged for the transfer of corporate shareholdings.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building magazine about the process of remediation for residential buildings with unsafe cladding

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Henry Winter and Jeffrey Lee write in Hubbis about arbitration and cross-border family wealth in Asia

    Henry Winter

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Owen and Lydia Kember write in Family Law Journal on the intersection of trust law and surrogacy

    Hannah Owen

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake and Mike Barrington write in Finextra about regulatory themes every FCA-authorised fintech leader should be watching

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    In the Press

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Darren Bailey writes in City AM about what European football could learn from the US sports law landscape

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys recognised in Spear’s Legal Indices 2026

    News

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath features in the latest episode of the Non-Billable podcast

    Simon Ridpath

    In the Press

    min read
  • Private equity (PE): How Founders and Management Teams can protect themselves - it’s a marriage of convenience so make sure your pre-nup is watertight…

    Nadim Meer

    Insights

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi writes in We Wealth about the treatment of joint bank accounts on inheritance

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
Back to top