• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The UK’s immigration white paper – what does it mean for British Nationals (Overseas)?

Last week the UK government published its long-awaited white paper, entitled ‘Restoring control over the immigration system’. 

This wide-ranging policy paper contains some seismic shifts to the UK immigration system. However, whilst the significance of some of these changes shouldn’t be underplayed, no actual law has changed yet and it could still be some time before all these measures take effect. 

One of the most significant changes, and one that is causing UK visa-holders much concern, is the planned increase in the qualifying period for settlement (also know as indefinite leave to remain or permanent residence) from five years to ten. There are plans to introduce a new concept of ‘earned settlement’, whereby visa-holders can reduce their qualifying period on the basis of their contributions to the UK economy and society using a points-based system. The qualifying period for citizenship will apparently be aligned with this but there is no further detail on that yet.

Will the proposed changes to settlement affect BN(O)s?

At present it is extremely unclear exactly which visa routes will be affected by the change to the settlement rules, and whether it will apply to those already in the UK, or only those who enter the relevant visa routes after the change takes effect. 

In the white paper, the government appeared to view the BN(O) route positively, stating on multiple occasions that the UK has, through the introduction of the visa category, rightly played a part in responding to the developments in Hong Kong at the time and allowing British Nationals (Overseas) to come to or stay in the UK. Elsewhere in the white paper, the government also explicitly stated that dependants of British citizens would be exempt from the change, so the qualifying settlement period for them will remain five years. There is no mention of other specific visa types or cohorts of people in the white paper in relation to this. In the UK Parliament last week though, the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper stated that the five-year route would be maintained for those with a dependant or family visa. This suggests that other visa routes which are family-focused, rather than work or study focused, may be included in the exemption. If that is the case, then we would expect the settlement period for BN(O) visa holders to remain five years, as it is a family / humanitarian visa route rather than an economic one. 

There is also case law which states that retrospective changes to the immigration rules may be unlawful, so any attempt by the government to apply the new rule to those already in the affected visa routes could be open to legal challenge. 

When will we know more?

The government has stated that it will publish further details on the new settlement and citizenship policies later this year, after which there will be a public consultation. So we should have greater clarity in due course on what the policy will mean, if anything, for BN(O) visa holders and their families. In the meantime, should you have any questions or concerns regarding these developments, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

The white paper sets out the government's plans to create an immigration system which "promotes growth but is controlled and managed".

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for IFA Magazine on risks arising from the intersection of family wealth and commercial lending

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: how to prepare for Martyn’s Law

    Ben Butterworth

    Podcasts

  • Iwan Thomas explores Nestlé’s ice cream exit in Food Manufacture

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises TPE on first PISCES share sale: Unlocking Liquidity in Oxford Science Enterprises

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    News

  • The Financial Times quotes Kelvin Tanner on increasing application rates for British citizenship

    Kelvin Tanner

    In the Press

  • Why the UK Remains Attractive to US Wealth Owners

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Big Changes to Packaging Waste Rules in UK and EU Supply Chains

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

Back to top