• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

New EU regulations for importing cultural property into the EU – what art collectors need to know

From 28 June 2025, regulations for importing cultural property into the EU are changing. The new regulations will apply to cultural goods being imported into the EU that were originally created or found outside the EU.

The regulations set out three categories of “cultural goods”:

Category A

  • Cultural goods (set out in Part A of the Annex to the Regulation) that were unlawfully exported from the location that they were originally created or found.
  • These goods are prohibited from being imported into the EU.

Category B

  • Cultural goods (set out in Part B of the Annex to the Regulation) that are more than 250 years old (with any value).
  • These goods include objects from archaeological excavations, statues, and icons.
  • An import licence will be necessary to import these goods into the EU. 

Category C

  • Cultural goods (set out in Part C of the Annex to the Regulation) that are more than 200 years old with a value of €18,000 or more.
  • These goods include paintings, prints, sculptures, coins, manuscripts, and books.
  • An import statement must be submitted on a new centralised electronic system accessible by customs authorities in EU Member States. 

To obtain a licence or to submit an import statement, the importer will need to evidence that the goods were lawfully exported from their country of origin (or provide evidence of the absence of such laws at the time of export). Examples of evidence include an export licence, a customs declaration, an affidavit from the vendor/exporter, auction catalogues, etc.).

This requires a high degree of due diligence as the importer will need to be able to establish where and when an object was first created or found and also evidence that it was exported lawfully from its country of origin.

Exceptions

Category B and C cultural goods will be allowed to be imported into the EU without proof of lawful export if:

  1. the country where the object was created or found cannot be reliably determined; or
     
  2. the object was removed from the country where it was created or found before 24 April 1972.  

These exceptions will only apply if the importer can evidence that the object was lawfully exported from the last country it was in (for a period of more than five years). The importer will still need to obtain a licence or provide an import statement. 

Key points for UK art collectors, dealers, and museums

Do the new regulations apply?
 To an EU Member StateTo England, Wales, and ScotlandTo Northern Ireland
Importing Category B or C “cultural goods” originally created or found inside the EU×××
Importing Category B or C “cultural goods” originally created or found outside the EU×

 

  • Cultural goods originally “created or discovered in the customs territory of the Union” are not affected by the new rules.
     
  • Following Brexit, the new EU regulations do not apply to those importing goods into England, Wales and Scotland. Northern Ireland, however, does remain part of the EU customs union.
     
  • Special rules apply to exhibitions and the temporary display of objects at art fairs.
     
  • The existing obligation to declare cultural property to EU customs and pay the relevant import duties will continue to apply in addition to the new regulations.
     
  • While art collectors will be well versed in the importance of provenance and due diligence, records and documentary evidence of lawful export will be a crucial consideration when purchasing cultural goods, especially if export to the EU is likely. 
     
  • By 28 June 2025, Member States will notify the Commission of the penalties applicable to the introduction of cultural goods in breach of the regulations.

Implications for the art market

The introduction of the new regulations is “for the purpose of safeguarding humanity’s cultural heritage and preventing the illicit trade in cultural goods”. 

However, the new regulations have been met with backlash, with critics arguing that:

  • cultural goods will not always have sufficient paperwork to evidence lawful export from their country of origin;
     
  • the burden of proof is too high, and even when the requisite paperwork is available, the process for obtaining a licence or submitting a statement may discourage the import of these goods into the EU; and
     
  • there will be negative repercussions on the European art market.

There will be both winners and losers as a result of these changes, but the UK art market could stand to benefit; particularly if the UK becomes a more attractive destination for art collectors and dealers who wish to avoid the complexities and challenges associated with the new EU regulations.

There will be both winners and losers as a result of these changes, but the UK art market could stand to benefit; particularly if the UK becomes a more attractive destination for art collectors and dealers who wish to avoid the complexities and challenges associated with the new EU regulations.

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Entrepreneurship, Investment and Risk: Key Insights for Family Offices

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    Quick Reads

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for IFA Magazine on risks arising from the intersection of family wealth and commercial lending

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: how to prepare for Martyn’s Law

    Ben Butterworth

    Podcasts

  • China stepping up efforts to attract foreign investment — New measures and new trends

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

  • Iwan Thomas explores Nestlé’s ice cream exit in Food Manufacture

    Iwan Thomas

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises TPE on first PISCES share sale: Unlocking Liquidity in Oxford Science Enterprises

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    News

  • The Financial Times quotes Kelvin Tanner on increasing application rates for British citizenship

    Kelvin Tanner

    In the Press

Back to top