• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

New EU regulations for importing cultural property into the EU – what art collectors need to know

min read

From 28 June 2025, regulations for importing cultural property into the EU are changing. The new regulations will apply to cultural goods being imported into the EU that were originally created or found outside the EU.

The regulations set out three categories of “cultural goods”:

Category A

  • Cultural goods (set out in Part A of the Annex to the Regulation) that were unlawfully exported from the location that they were originally created or found.
  • These goods are prohibited from being imported into the EU.

Category B

  • Cultural goods (set out in Part B of the Annex to the Regulation) that are more than 250 years old (with any value).
  • These goods include objects from archaeological excavations, statues, and icons.
  • An import licence will be necessary to import these goods into the EU. 

Category C

  • Cultural goods (set out in Part C of the Annex to the Regulation) that are more than 200 years old with a value of €18,000 or more.
  • These goods include paintings, prints, sculptures, coins, manuscripts, and books.
  • An import statement must be submitted on a new centralised electronic system accessible by customs authorities in EU Member States. 

To obtain a licence or to submit an import statement, the importer will need to evidence that the goods were lawfully exported from their country of origin (or provide evidence of the absence of such laws at the time of export). Examples of evidence include an export licence, a customs declaration, an affidavit from the vendor/exporter, auction catalogues, etc.).

This requires a high degree of due diligence as the importer will need to be able to establish where and when an object was first created or found and also evidence that it was exported lawfully from its country of origin.

Exceptions

Category B and C cultural goods will be allowed to be imported into the EU without proof of lawful export if:

  1. the country where the object was created or found cannot be reliably determined; or
     
  2. the object was removed from the country where it was created or found before 24 April 1972.  

These exceptions will only apply if the importer can evidence that the object was lawfully exported from the last country it was in (for a period of more than five years). The importer will still need to obtain a licence or provide an import statement. 

Key points for UK art collectors, dealers, and museums

Do the new regulations apply?
 To an EU Member StateTo England, Wales, and ScotlandTo Northern Ireland
Importing Category B or C “cultural goods” originally created or found inside the EU×××
Importing Category B or C “cultural goods” originally created or found outside the EU×

 

  • Cultural goods originally “created or discovered in the customs territory of the Union” are not affected by the new rules.
     
  • Following Brexit, the new EU regulations do not apply to those importing goods into England, Wales and Scotland. Northern Ireland, however, does remain part of the EU customs union.
     
  • Special rules apply to exhibitions and the temporary display of objects at art fairs.
     
  • The existing obligation to declare cultural property to EU customs and pay the relevant import duties will continue to apply in addition to the new regulations.
     
  • While art collectors will be well versed in the importance of provenance and due diligence, records and documentary evidence of lawful export will be a crucial consideration when purchasing cultural goods, especially if export to the EU is likely. 
     
  • By 28 June 2025, Member States will notify the Commission of the penalties applicable to the introduction of cultural goods in breach of the regulations.

Implications for the art market

The introduction of the new regulations is “for the purpose of safeguarding humanity’s cultural heritage and preventing the illicit trade in cultural goods”. 

However, the new regulations have been met with backlash, with critics arguing that:

  • cultural goods will not always have sufficient paperwork to evidence lawful export from their country of origin;
     
  • the burden of proof is too high, and even when the requisite paperwork is available, the process for obtaining a licence or submitting a statement may discourage the import of these goods into the EU; and
     
  • there will be negative repercussions on the European art market.

There will be both winners and losers as a result of these changes, but the UK art market could stand to benefit; particularly if the UK becomes a more attractive destination for art collectors and dealers who wish to avoid the complexities and challenges associated with the new EU regulations.

There will be both winners and losers as a result of these changes, but the UK art market could stand to benefit; particularly if the UK becomes a more attractive destination for art collectors and dealers who wish to avoid the complexities and challenges associated with the new EU regulations.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • In-House Insights: Next Gen Drinks Reception

    Events

    min read
  • How do the King’s Speech Bills Answer the New Energy Reality?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • ‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’…But It Might Lose You Money: Conduct in the No-Fault Divorce Era

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Darren Bailey comments in City AM about mandatory release clauses and the future of football transfers

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • US – UK Energy Collaboration

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises the shareholders of Pooky Lighting on its acquisition by leading US lighting company Visual Comfort & Co.

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • Welfare always prevails? The implications of A & B v C & D [2026] EWHC 972 (Fam) for UK domestic and overseas surrogacy

    Ben Haynes

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • Spear's features William Longrigg's views on potential reforms to the UK family court and the reintroduction of Calderbank offers

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: the latest on tenant CVAs and Restructuring Plans

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Affidavits in International Litigation - Lessons for Trust Companies from a Recent Geneva Judgment

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • 5 things English companies and their investors need to know about human rights-related litigation risks

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Are you ready for the EU Forced Labour Regulation?

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 4: Inheritance tax and estate planning

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top