• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Planning essentials case update: do I need planning permission to work from home?

Planning permission is required for a “material change of use” pursuant to section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. However, there is no statutory definition of what amounts to a material change of use – instead it is a question of fact and degree and a judgment must be made by the decision maker i.e. in the first instance the local planning authority, taking account of case law and national guidance. 

The first step is to define the “planning unit” under consideration and then consider the existing and proposed use of that unit. In many cases, the planning unit will simply be the unit of occupation. 

The next step is to consider whether the change of use of the planning unit would be material – which includes consideration of any change to the character of the existing use and the resulting impact on the use of the land. 

Where multiple uses are proposed in the same planning unit, the local planning authority should consider whether there is a “primary” use to which other uses are “ancillary”. Whether a use is ancillary depends on its functional relationship to the main use; it is a test of whether something is “ordinarily incidental” to the primary use. If the primary use is not proposed to change (and the change is to “ancillary” uses only), then there will be no “material change of use” and planning permission will not be required.

Therefore, if you work from home it may be that your ‘working’ use is ancillary to your primary residential use. For example, if you use one of the rooms in your home as an office on a few days a week it is likely that this office use will be considered “ordinarily incidental”, and therefore ancillary to, your main residential use. In such a scenario you would not usually need planning permission. However, it will depend on the precise facts and circumstances. 

A recent appeal to the Planning Inspectorate provides a useful example (for the full decision see here): 

  • The appellant was operating a child-minding business at their dwellinghouse. Up to six children attended for three and a half days a week. The childminding licence permitted up to nine children, and often different children attended in the morning to the afternoon. 
  • In terms of the planning unit; part of the ground floor and garden was essentially set aside for child-minding but some ground floor areas reverted to the normal residential use outside the child-minding sessions.
  • In terms of the character of the use, the Inspector noted that whilst the property remained residential, the character had changed to a degree (given how the ground floor had altered its functions).
  • As regards the impact on the land, the Inspector noted that there would be increased traffic movements, demand for on-street parking, noise and disturbance beyond what could reasonably be associated with a residential use only. 

The Planning Inspectorate concluded that the child-minding use was not akin to a home office, but rather resulted in a notable change in the character of the property – such that there was a material change of use (from residential use to mixed use) which required planning permission. 

If you are considering carrying out any extra uses at your home you should consider whether the new use(s) will change the character of the residential use, and whether there is any extra impact on the area such as through increased traffic or noise which could mean that planning permission is required. 

If in doubt you should speak to officers at your local planning authority and consider applying for a certificate of proposed lawful use to provide certainty. 

"in a factory with an office and a staff canteen, the office and staff canteen would normally be regarded as ancillary to the factory"

Our thinking

  • What do agricultural landlords and workers need to know about the Renters’ Rights Act?

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • What legal developments can the Living Sector expect as we approach the end of 2025 and look ahead to 2026?

    Mark White

    Insights

  • Andrew Ross and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on a Supreme Court judgment relating to nuisance

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters its Corporate team with the appointment of Ed Morgan

    David Collins

    News

  • VAT on Developer’s Biodiversity net gain (BNG) costs

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • James Broadhurst writes for Family Office Magazine on the attractiveness of hotels as an asset class

    James Broadhurst

    In the Press

  • What role can construction lawyers play in helping UK construction sector clients achieve greater success and how?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Installing Chinese Turbines in European Wind Projects – what do you need to know?

    Jue Jun Lu

    Insights

  • Updates to the Planning Practice Guidance relating to the Green Belt

    Titilope Hassan

    Insights

  • Solar developments and “overplanting”

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Heritage Partnership Agreements: the future of historic buildings?

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Flood risk planning policy resets: How the new NPPF and PPG can unlock constrained sites for development

    Josh Risso-Gill

    Insights

  • What are the trends in the purpose built student accommodation market in the UK over the last 12 months and how will they change in the next 12 months

    Mark White

    Insights

  • Maile v Maile – Assurances and Detriment Under the Microscope in Family Farm Claims

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Renters’ Rights and Build to Rent: Top 5 key changes operators and investors need to know about

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • Renters’ Rights and Student Accommodation: What is the latest as the Act obtains Royal Assent?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • Essential Residential: What is the latest on Renters’ Rights and Leasehold Reform?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

  • Planning horizon scanning: 2025 and beyond

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Cara Imbrailo on trends in commercial property

    Cara Imbrailo

    In the Press

  • Planning, Housing Today and ENDS Report quote Claire Fallows on the Supreme Court's long awaited nutrient neutrality ruling

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

Back to top