• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Available in other languages:

New FIBA Rule on Payment to Agents

min read

The International Basketball Federation (FIBA) has introduced a significant regulatory change, effective from 5 December 2024, which prohibits clubs from paying agents on behalf of players

This change, detailed in the amendment to former Article 3-297, now Article 299(b)) of the FIBA Internal Regulations, aims to eliminate conflicts of interests and ensure that agents are paid solely by their clients, thereby reinforcing the integrity of the agent-player relationship. 

New Article 3-299(b) reads as follows:

“[…] A FIBA-Licensed Agent (and any legal entity or non-incorporated business through which one operates) shall not […] b. accept payment for his or her services by anyone other than his or her client […].”

Clubs are required to comply by ceasing any direct or indirect payments to agents and amending ongoing transactions accordingly. 

Enforcement of this rule, initially set for 1 February 2025, has been postponed to 1 July 2025 following opposition from certain European agents and clubs, providing clubs with a transitional period to adjust their practices. 

One of the reasons for some European clubs' opposition to that change is that this new rule will in practice constrain the clubs, at the players' request, to increase their overall remuneration to compensate for the amount that will be owed directly by the player to his agent, with the ‘extra cost’ in social security charges that the amount in question will represent.

Contracts signed before this enforcement date under the previous regulations will not be sanctioned, but any new or renewed contracts must adhere to the new rules, with non-compliance resulting in disciplinary measures.

The rationale behind FIBA's amendment is to uphold high standards of integrity and transparency in basketball, as FIBA argues the direct or indirect payment of players' agents by clubs has long posed a risk of conflicts of interests, potentially compromising agents' independence in representing their clients' best interests. By mandating that agents are paid exclusively by their clients, FIBA aims to strengthen the impartiality and integrity of the agent-player relationship, ensuring that all stakeholders act in the best interests of the sport and its participants.

In Switzerland, although the involvement of agents is not compulsory for the signing of athletes, it does provide added value in terms of networking and bringing clubs into contact with players available on the market, particularly for international transfers. Agents must be registered and authorised, with verification of their authorisation and representation by the clubs.

Swiss law (Art. 20 OSE and 3(2) OEmol-LSE) stipulates that if the agent is commissioned by the player, the maximum commission charged by the agent may be 5% of the first overall gross annual salary, plus VAT, which overrides FIBA’s allowance of up to 10%.

Our thinking

  • Swiss Mutual Tax Assistance

    Frédéric Ney

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • The Future of Sports Arbitration in Asia

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Fowl Play: Lessons from Lux Films Ltd v Fowler & Anor [2026] EWHC 963 (KB)

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Family team successfully represent high-profile businessman in High Court jurisdiction dispute case

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Corporate Deal Highlights - A spotlight on H1 2026

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

    min read
  • Anna Sowerby writes in City AM about the implications for sponsorship agreements when sporting events are cancelled

    Anna Sowerby

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys reports strong firmwide revenue growth, with 10% increase to £266.5m

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • Extra Time: The Changing Face Of Sport And Law

    Darren Bailey

    Podcasts

  • Domestic Abuse and Football

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Criminal Lawyers Switzerland 2026: Corporate Criminal Liability, AML Risks & Enforcement

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Insights

    min read
  • Switzerland's New Stalking Offence (article 181b SCC): What Businesses, In‑house Counsel and Executives Must Know

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Insights

    min read
  • How to Respond to a Dawn Raid in Switzerland: Immediate Steps, Sealing (CPC), Privilege & Electronic Data

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Insights

    min read
  • Health is the New Growth Market in European F&B M&A

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys celebrates year-on-year recognition in Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2026

    Piers Master

    News

    min read
  • Swiss executors dealing with UK assets – what do I do? Part two

    Sophie Hart

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • 9fin quotes Jamie Rhodes and Tom Smitham on the growing role of private capital in football finance

    Jamie Rhodes

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top