• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Available in other languages:

New FIBA Rule on Payment to Agents

min read

The International Basketball Federation (FIBA) has introduced a significant regulatory change, effective from 5 December 2024, which prohibits clubs from paying agents on behalf of players

This change, detailed in the amendment to former Article 3-297, now Article 299(b)) of the FIBA Internal Regulations, aims to eliminate conflicts of interests and ensure that agents are paid solely by their clients, thereby reinforcing the integrity of the agent-player relationship. 

New Article 3-299(b) reads as follows:

“[…] A FIBA-Licensed Agent (and any legal entity or non-incorporated business through which one operates) shall not […] b. accept payment for his or her services by anyone other than his or her client […].”

Clubs are required to comply by ceasing any direct or indirect payments to agents and amending ongoing transactions accordingly. 

Enforcement of this rule, initially set for 1 February 2025, has been postponed to 1 July 2025 following opposition from certain European agents and clubs, providing clubs with a transitional period to adjust their practices. 

One of the reasons for some European clubs' opposition to that change is that this new rule will in practice constrain the clubs, at the players' request, to increase their overall remuneration to compensate for the amount that will be owed directly by the player to his agent, with the ‘extra cost’ in social security charges that the amount in question will represent.

Contracts signed before this enforcement date under the previous regulations will not be sanctioned, but any new or renewed contracts must adhere to the new rules, with non-compliance resulting in disciplinary measures.

The rationale behind FIBA's amendment is to uphold high standards of integrity and transparency in basketball, as FIBA argues the direct or indirect payment of players' agents by clubs has long posed a risk of conflicts of interests, potentially compromising agents' independence in representing their clients' best interests. By mandating that agents are paid exclusively by their clients, FIBA aims to strengthen the impartiality and integrity of the agent-player relationship, ensuring that all stakeholders act in the best interests of the sport and its participants.

In Switzerland, although the involvement of agents is not compulsory for the signing of athletes, it does provide added value in terms of networking and bringing clubs into contact with players available on the market, particularly for international transfers. Agents must be registered and authorised, with verification of their authorisation and representation by the clubs.

Swiss law (Art. 20 OSE and 3(2) OEmol-LSE) stipulates that if the agent is commissioned by the player, the maximum commission charged by the agent may be 5% of the first overall gross annual salary, plus VAT, which overrides FIBA’s allowance of up to 10%.

Our thinking

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Arise Capital Partners on its acquisition of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

    Keir Gordon

    News

    min read
  • Benoît Pasquier comments in Law UK on Switzerland as a leading centre for sports disputes

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

    min read
  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Motorsport Races – Top Legal Considerations

    Anna Sowerby

    Insights

    min read
  • Disputes Over Donuts: Dawn Raids – Preparation, Response and What to Expect

    Jonathan Huth

    Podcasts

  • Michael Wells-Greco comments in the BBC on a Supreme Court adoption ruling

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

    min read
  • Sadie Pitman writes in Local Government Lawyer on assets of community value and changes for sporting grounds

    Sadie Pitman

    In the Press

    min read
  • A new chapter for new arrivals: the FIG regime and long-term residence

    Sophie Hart

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens its position in the latest Legal 500 EMEA directory, with 22 firm rankings

    News

    min read
  • Playing the Long Game: A Guide to Minority Sports Investments

    Grace Hudson

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys wins ‘Family Law Legal Team of the Year’ at WealthBriefing European Awards 2026

    Shona Alexander

    News

    min read
  • Informal family agreements, constructive trusts and joint property ownership – lessons from the recent High Court decision in Uddin v Uddin [2026] EWHC 150 (Ch)

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

    min read
  • The new playbook for women’s football: ownership, investment and growth

    Nic Couchman

    Insights

    min read
  • Child Maintenance and Sport: A Game of Two Halves

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys Strengthens Swiss Tax Capabilities with Appointment of Frédéric Ney in Geneva

    Frédéric Ney

    News

    min read
  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

    min read
  • Assets of Community Value – a sporting revolution

    Sadie Pitman

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Media City Qatar: Regulatory Framework, Market Enablers, and Development Pathways

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

    min read
  • Family Law lookahead – 2026

    Jemimah Fleet

    Insights

    min read
  • AI in arbitration: rules, tools, and risks

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top