• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Further protection may mean further complications for development in Protected Landscapes

min read

In December 2024, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs produced new guidance for relevant authorities on seeking to further the purposes of Protected Landscapes (available here). Protected Landscapes include National Parks, National Landscapes (formerly referred to as areas of outstanding natural beauty), and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads in England. 

The guidance clarifies the effect of an amendment introduced by the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023, which shifted the duty of relevant authorities from a requirement to 'have regard to' the statutory purposes of Protected Landscapes to actively 'seek to further' them. This duty applies to any government department, public body or person holding public office when undertaking any function which could impact land in a Protected Landscape. Such functions include:

  • The preparation of Development Plans, Local Nature Recovery Strategies, Protected Landscape Management Plans and other spatial strategies; 
  • Decision-making in respect of planning applications and nationally significant infrastructure projects;
  • Planning appeals and inquiries; and
  • The issuing of licenses and permits.

The guidance emphasises the active nature of the updated duty, requiring authorities to demonstrate with documented evidence how they have considered measures to further the purposes of Protected Landscapes. This includes embedding such measures in the design of plans and proposals, where feasible.

The statutory purposes of a Protected Landscape differ slightly depending on the type of Protected Landscape involved, however for the most part these include:

  • Conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the given area; and
  • Promoting opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities by the public of those areas. 

The duty will also apply where a decision outside the designated boundary could impact on the Protected Landscape, for example in relation to dark skies, long views of the Protected Landscape or in connection with rights of way / Open Access Land. 

Under the new guidance, when determining a planning application for land in a Protected Landscape, a local planning authority will have to consider the application against the relevant statutory purposes and objectives in the Protected Landscape’s Management Plan and whether the application includes measures which contribute to the enhancement of the Protected Landscape (and if so, how these are to be funded and maintained). 

Under the NPPF, planning permission for major development should be refused unless there are exceptional circumstances and the development is in the public interest – requiring a balancing exercise to be undertaken. There are cases in the courts raising the application of the revised duty in the context of planning applications and it will be interesting to see the outcome.

‘Protected Landscapes’ refers to National Parks, the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads and National Landscapes in England.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • 9fin quotes Jamie Rhodes and Tom Smitham on the growing role of private capital in football finance

    Jamie Rhodes

    In the Press

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Who Is Affected?

    Kerry Stares

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The National Security and Investment Act, Five Years On: What the 2025-26 Annual Report Tells Foreign Buyers

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Three Things You Need to Know

    Kerry Stares

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Jersey Trade Mark Reform: What the New Regime Means for You

    Dewdney William Drew

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • New EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Is Your Business Ready?

    Kerry Stares

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Telegraph quotes Julia Cox on the growing use of Family Investment Companies for inheritance planning

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

    min read
  • Tessa Bartley comments in Legal Futures about our framework for choosing the right legal AI tools

    Tessa Bartley

    In the Press

    min read
  • Investors’ Chronicle quotes Katie Talbot on the risks and responsibilities of undertaking a trustee position

    Katie Talbot

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in Employee Benefits on minimum wage enforcement changes

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Retail Collection: Reputation management for brand founders

    Claudine Morgan

    Podcasts

  • Charlie Ring and Mike Barrington write for Professional Adviser on how best to prepare for the sale of a financial services business

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

    min read
  • EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Beware the “late invoice” clause: TCC confirms the final date for payment must be fixed to the due date

    William Turner

    Insights

    min read
  • Fraudsters in the Inbox: The Limits of Contractual Causation in Logix Aero v Siam Aero

    Natalya Stone

    Insights

    min read
  • Light Bites, expert nuggets for the seasoned developer: bonus episode

    James Souter

    Podcasts

  • Mace Construct Ltd v Baltic Investment Holdings Ltd: A case highlighting the risk of including tender clarifications and schedules of derogations in building contracts

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

    min read
  • Child Maintenance: Reform, a Key Appeal, and the Elusive Christmas Order

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • High Court interprets repair covenant in Hotel lease and statutory fire safety obligations

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
Back to top