• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Further protection may mean further complications for development in Protected Landscapes

In December 2024, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs produced new guidance for relevant authorities on seeking to further the purposes of Protected Landscapes (available here). Protected Landscapes include National Parks, National Landscapes (formerly referred to as areas of outstanding natural beauty), and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads in England. 

The guidance clarifies the effect of an amendment introduced by the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023, which shifted the duty of relevant authorities from a requirement to 'have regard to' the statutory purposes of Protected Landscapes to actively 'seek to further' them. This duty applies to any government department, public body or person holding public office when undertaking any function which could impact land in a Protected Landscape. Such functions include:

  • The preparation of Development Plans, Local Nature Recovery Strategies, Protected Landscape Management Plans and other spatial strategies; 
  • Decision-making in respect of planning applications and nationally significant infrastructure projects;
  • Planning appeals and inquiries; and
  • The issuing of licenses and permits.

The guidance emphasises the active nature of the updated duty, requiring authorities to demonstrate with documented evidence how they have considered measures to further the purposes of Protected Landscapes. This includes embedding such measures in the design of plans and proposals, where feasible.

The statutory purposes of a Protected Landscape differ slightly depending on the type of Protected Landscape involved, however for the most part these include:

  • Conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the given area; and
  • Promoting opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities by the public of those areas. 

The duty will also apply where a decision outside the designated boundary could impact on the Protected Landscape, for example in relation to dark skies, long views of the Protected Landscape or in connection with rights of way / Open Access Land. 

Under the new guidance, when determining a planning application for land in a Protected Landscape, a local planning authority will have to consider the application against the relevant statutory purposes and objectives in the Protected Landscape’s Management Plan and whether the application includes measures which contribute to the enhancement of the Protected Landscape (and if so, how these are to be funded and maintained). 

Under the NPPF, planning permission for major development should be refused unless there are exceptional circumstances and the development is in the public interest – requiring a balancing exercise to be undertaken. There are cases in the courts raising the application of the revised duty in the context of planning applications and it will be interesting to see the outcome.

‘Protected Landscapes’ refers to National Parks, the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads and National Landscapes in England.

Our thinking

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Resilience in Entrepreneurship

    Events

  • FT Adviser reports on our Gen Z survey and quotes William Marriott and Sally Ashford on the financial behaviours of this cohort

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Building Liability Orders: New Guidance from the Courts

    Melanie Hardingham

    Insights

  • Arbitrating shareholders’ disputes

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • The Wealth Net profiles Sarah Rowley, Head of Charities and Philanthropy

    Sarah Rowley

    In the Press

  • William Marriott and Sophie Clark write for EG Magazine on structuring the bank of mum and dad and family trusts

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Modernising Business Tenancies: Should the redevelopment ground be altered?

    Andrew Ross

    Insights

  • Dominic Lawrance and Catrin Harrison write for Tax Journal on the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of ‘A Taxpayer v HMRC’

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • BBC Radio 5 Live and The Telegraph interview Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s plans for cohabitation reform

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Something Changed – Landlord recovers possession of iconic music venue

    Samuel Lear

    Quick Reads

  • Implications of Johnson v FirstRand – will secret commissions pave the way for claims from Auto ABS noteholders?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • Property Week quotes Georgina Muskett on the future implications of a high-profile court judgment relating to a £32.5m moth-infested mansion

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Claire Fallows on the government's new Planning and Infrastructure Bill

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Joseph Evans, Cassidy Fan and Jessica Boxford write for New Law Journal on the future of insolvency: a digital asset revolution

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • Cohabitation law reform

    Hannah Owen

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter - Lifetime achievements: Katie Kopec of JLL

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • PBC Today quotes Mark White on Manchester United's plans to build a new football stadium worth £2 billion

    Mark White

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that Gen Z prioritises financial planning and saving amidst growing economic challenges

    Sally Ashford

    News

Back to top